The List Of Democrats Not Attending Inaugration Growing...

[LexusLover]

There are probably some folks who want to come, so now they have seats.

Trump drew crowds before the election ... He still does.

[Stockinglover]

The assholes are going to miss a chance to suck Hillary's cock since somebody invited that cunt and piece of shit husband.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Stockinglover

The assholes are going to miss a chance to suck Hillary's cock since somebody invited that cunt and piece of shit husband.

Someone else had the idea ... but an expanded version ....

.. fill the empty seats from the whiners not being there ...

... with hot babes in blue dresses ..... 60+ of them!!!!

And in unison ... they all stand up and wave to Bill and say "HI!"

[gnadfly]

I hope Ma Hillary is there dressed in a pantsuit and those special glasses and has a seizure when Trump raises his hand...with Ruth Bader Ginsberg having one at the same time.

[LexusLover]

^^^^ The Clintons and their Coloring Book Groupies ..

.. are probably hoping Trump has one so they can claim the Throne!

[Gotyour6]

I thought these retards represented both sides once elected.

So I want them to attend but yet they wont because they disagree with him but i don't?

How about doing your fucking job and pay respect to the position and not the person.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Gotyour6

How about doing your fucking job and pay respect to the position and not the person.

That requires self-respect and integrity.

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Someone else had the idea ... but an expanded version ....

.. fill the empty seats from the whiners not being there ...

... with hot babes in blue dresses ..... 60+ of them!!!!

And in unison ... they all stand up and wave to Bill and say "HI!"

" Beware those devils in bLew(insky) dresses " !!! Poor ole Slick Willy ! Wonder if odummer will give HIM a pardon on his way out the door ? !

[wordup666]

Originally Posted by lustylad

You're missing my point. The Dems are the trailblazers. They're the ones who created the Biden Rule whereby it became acceptable to block confirmation of Supreme Court nominees during a Presidential election year, then they bitched when Republicans followed this new rule. They're the ones who invoked the "nuclear option" in Harry Reid's Senate to stack the federal Courts - now watch them yell foul when Republicans take advantage of it to push through nominees under Trump. And they're the ones who are now pushing their elected representatives to boycott a Presidential Inauguration, setting yet another sad new low in partisan spitefulness!

Those are just 3 examples, but there are many others. Like I said, the Democrats are LEADING this race to the bottom.

I did not miss your point, No need to hijack your own post.
You did miss mine.

[wordup666]

Originally Posted by Budman

I don't remember the republicans not showing up for the current HNIC inauguration. I guarantee you that the right was just as dismayed over his election as the left is now. The difference is acting like a patriotic adult or a spoiled little brat.

No republicans have boycotted any inauguration. There are about 100 lawmakers who miss it because of prior commitments. which seems like a lame excuse.

[tonyvicksa]

'With respect to the inauguration, I am not going to comment on those issues,' Obama said. 'All I know is I'm going to be there. So is Michelle.'

He is a spineless fuck!! Does anyone doubt that if the tables were turned and Repubs were boycotting that cunt Hillary he would be all over TV.

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by wordup666

No republicans have boycotted any inauguration. There are about 100 lawmakers who miss it because of prior commitments. which seems like a lame excuse.

How can you doubt their "prior commitments"? They would certainly have been there but the Dems didn't pick the inauguration date until the last minute--don't you remember?

This is another one of those situations where each side pulls the same crap, but they only gripe about it when the "others" do it. It was wrong for the Reps to have so many important "other commitments" then, and wrong for the Dems to do it now.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Old-T

How can you doubt their "prior commitments"? They would certainly have been there but the Dems didn't pick the inauguration date until the last minute--don't you remember?

This is another one of those situations where each side pulls the same crap, but they only gripe about it when the "others" do it. It was wrong for the Reps to have so many important "other commitments" then, and wrong for the Dems to do it now.

No, each side doesn't "pull the same crap". Republican lawmakers have never sponsored an organized boycott or publicly urged their members not to attend. Why do you trust Wordup? He doesn't provide a link for his number, nor does he say which inauguration(s) that number refers to. Here is a link wherein the Library of Congress researched the question and determined the only rough precedent was Nixon's second inauguration back in 1973 - when those boycotting were also Democrats.

http://time.com/4636736/inauguration-boycott-1973/

[Zhivago52]

Lewis has lied so much over his career I'm beginning to wonder if his account of what happened to him at Selma actually occurred.

[wordup666]

Originally Posted by Old-T

How can you doubt their "prior commitments"? They would certainly have been there but the Dems didn't pick the inauguration date until the last minute--don't you remember?

This is another one of those situations where each side pulls the same crap, but they only gripe about it when the "others" do it. It was wrong for the Reps to have so many important "other commitments" then, and wrong for the Dems to do it now.

Do the dems get to pick each date?

There is one that comes around every four years, around the same time.