Ladies ~ Your Perception of a Hobbyists Volume of Reviews

[Loxly]

There's been many comments over what hobbyists consider to be high volume. What I'd be interested in hearing is how you ladies view a hobbyist with respect to the number of reviews they've written, without regard for how many were good or bad.

I'd guess that if you're a "newbie" that you'd be happiest seeing someone who writes a lot of reviews and perhaps less impressed with someone who has 100+ if you're a more "seasoned" professional.

Do you factor in their "join date" against the number of reviews? i.e. on ECCIE 4 years and has 10 reviews as opposed to being here 2 years with 45 reviews?

If you run a "review special", but when you check you see the low ratio of membership to reviews, do you pass? (Also have to wonder how many times you've not gotten a review from a "review special")

Do you relax your screening (references) at all for those with a lot of reviews or have met at a M&G?

Have you ever used a hobbyist's review count in soliciting via a PM? I've had two instances where "newbies" have PM'd me and when pressed for a reason they finally said that they felt I would write a review. Maybe so. Might also be that they figured I had the cash to cover the date due to my own volume of reviews. (Big mistake on their part thinking I have deep pockets)

For clarity sake it's just about volume and not who the hobbyists might have seen that you personally don't like or any activities that you don't provide.

[fun2come]

Hey, you have 28 days to catch up....

Plus, can't wait to see SL's or Toyz' or somebody else's definition of High Volume/Quality to Cheap Bastards Man Whores...

[Listener]

An exorbitantly high volume of reviews certainly hasn't been a problem for SL. There's your answer right there.

[shayla84]

I would say hes having the time of his fucking life and bravo!