Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
This from your article....ISIS is your number one concern!
On issues they see as “extremely important” in the midterms, a majority of Tea Party supporters choose ISIS (57%)
You do understand that the majority of the folks y'all ran against GOP incumbents lost don't ya? Again , this from your own article.
Lower profile, indeed. The results of the primary elections had been seen as a rebuke to Tea Party activists, as challengers to Republican Senate incumbents failed to net a single win. Only David Perdue’s defeat of Jack Kingston for the US Senate nomination appeared to fit the profile of a Tea Party victory, but Kingston was well regarded by conservative activists as a member of the House. That outcome looked more like populist rejection of a Washington figure, and at any rate Perdue performed relatively the same against Michelle Nunn in pre-runoff polling. The only real surprise of this cycle was Eric Cantor’s loss to a neophyte in the Virginia-07 primary, but Tea Party organizations didn’t get involved in that race until after the primary.
So you are back but are going to have to vote for folks you did not support in the primary? You're bragging about that?
Hardly none of your Tea Party backed challengers beat a GOP backed candidate in the.
So what you really should have said was....We're baaa-aaaack to voting for who the GOP wants us to vote for in the General Election.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
What? You missed all of those announcements that the Tea party was dead? You were even one of them. Must be pretty embarassing to be you isn't it.
You're dead as a national party movement. You still are able to vote. Jesus. You couldn't even field challengers to beat the GOP incumbents. You and IFFY should PM me to see if you correctly understand a article before posting it.
Come the morning of November 5th, there will be more Tea Party backed candidates elected to public offices (local, state, and federal) than there were on the morning of November 4th !
On issues they see as “extremely important” in the midterms, a majority of Tea Party supporters choose ISIS (57%)
You do understand that the majority of the folks y'all ran against GOP incumbents lost don't ya? Again , this from your own article.
Lower profile, indeed. The results of the primary elections had been seen as a rebuke to Tea Party activists, as challengers to Republican Senate incumbents failed to net a single win. Only David Perdue’s defeat of Jack Kingston for the US Senate nomination appeared to fit the profile of a Tea Party victory, but Kingston was well regarded by conservative activists as a member of the House. That outcome looked more like populist rejection of a Washington figure, and at any rate Perdue performed relatively the same against Michelle Nunn in pre-runoff polling. The only real surprise of this cycle was Eric Cantor’s loss to a neophyte in the Virginia-07 primary, but Tea Party organizations didn’t get involved in that race until after the primary.
So you are back but are going to have to vote for folks you did not support in the primary? You're bragging about that?
Come the morning of November 5th, there will be more Tea Party backed candidates elected to public offices (local, state, and federal) than there were on the morning of November 4th !
That is progress....keep trying to spin WTF.
Please tell me how many Tea backed candidates beat incumbent GOP Senators and House members.
Who cares how many County Seats you win. They are just in red red states. You are going backwards not forward if that is how you are keeping score. Get back with me when you can start winning some Senate seats.
We're baaaa-aaack
