is this alert worthy - looking for opinions

[MountainGoat]

so you spend a considerable amount of time texting back and forth with a VP attempting to set up an appointment and finally arrange something on the night before. The time is set for noon at her place. She requests that you call in the morning to verify. You agree. At 1015 you send her a txt asking if its ok to call - no response. At 1125 she sends txts accusing you of NCNS. You respond that the appointment is at noon and continue to get ready. You arrive at 1159 and send txt that you are there. At 1206 she sends an apartment number via txt. You enter building and knock on door - no answer, you ring bell 2x - no answer. you leave. at 1215 you send txt thanking her for wasting your time. at 1225 she responds "said you would call and confirm in am...... thought you were a no show"


I'm considering an alert or a review with a "NO" recommendation

looking for input

[Tiger]

Review with 'no' and time wasted.
It's not really an alert since your safety nor the communities is at risk.

[pyramider]

It's not a review since nothing happened.

Why did you send a text rather than calling? You said you were supposed to call to confirm but you sent a text.

[pacman2]

Yeah, you should've followed her "instructions"

[MountainGoat]

Originally Posted by pyramider

It's not a review since nothing happened.

Why did you send a text rather than calling? You said you were supposed to call to confirm but you sent a text.

i sent a text asking if it was ok to call. Didn't know if she was awake yet and didn't want to call if she wasnt. she responded about an hour later on the same number - so it is highly likely that she didn't received the text

IMHO, the bottom line here is that she sent me an apartment number via text at 1205 - that invalidates the original NCNS allegation at 1125 and makes the 1225 NCNS statement laughable

[jackfengshui]

Coincidence? http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...45&postcount=5

[MountainGoat]

Originally Posted by jackfengshui

Coincidence? http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...45&postcount=5

Not the VP in question Jack, and see my previous comment. I was really trying to act in her best interest and be considerate to her - not wanting to wake her with a phone call.

[Guest120615-3]

Not alert worthy but definitely sounds familiar. LL.

[J.J. Walker]

Good coed discussion

[anonymous1862]

Just leave a no-show review for her. This has happened to me twice with the same provider, so I did leave a no-show review. this goes on their review list and next time people can expect no show when they contact the provider.

[clearlylost]

So who is the provider?

[MountainGoat]

what say you johnnycap? is this worthy of my first "No" review i'm leaning that way right now

[Taskmaster]

Well it does no good to throw out the teaser here with no name. If you want the most impact, a No review does that as it stays with her. Otherwise , at least a mention in Coed gets the word out (or a mention in the Men's Lounge for a smaller audience) while avoiding an inappropriate Alert.

[MountainGoat]

Originally Posted by Taskmaster

Well it does no good to throw out the teaser here with no name. If you want the most impact, a No review does that as it stays with her. Otherwise , at least a mention in Coed gets the word out (or a mention in the Men's Lounge for a smaller audience) while avoiding an inappropriate Alert.

ah TM, but I am trying to be the gentleman that Tiger suggested i was. Sort of a no kiss and tell. Guess I'm just looking to some feedback before deciding which audience to present to. I know its a tease of sorts but I'm keeping her reputation in mind. As JC has called me to task in another thread - I've never had reason to give a "no" before. I'm hedging with this situation.

all in good time and the proper place

[Taskmaster]

Originally Posted by MountainGoat

ah TM, but I am trying to be the gentleman that Tiger suggested i was. Sort of a no kiss and tell. Guess I'm just looking to some feedback before deciding which audience to present to. I know its a tease of sorts but I'm keeping her reputation in mind. As JC has called me to task in another thread - I've never had reason to give a "no" before. I'm hedging with this situation.

all in good time and the proper place

Your call and your prerogative. However, despite the fact that you are usually a gentleman (and hopefully this won't burst your bubble), but I believe Tiger was referring to another missing member with the handle Perfect Gentleman when he made that post rather than calling you a perfect gentleman. Only he could confirm that though.

Tiger?