Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > Kansas and Missouri > Kansas City Metro > The Sandbox
test
The Sandbox The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here. If it's NOT hobby-related, then you're in the right place!

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
George Spelvin 312
Starscream66 302
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 262
Top Posters
DallasRain71328
biomed167669
Yssup Rider62836
gman4454996
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49483
WTF48272
pyramider46422
bambino45243
The_Waco_Kid39864
CryptKicker37390
Mokoa36499
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Dr-epg34181

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-05-2011, 09:54 AM   #1
KCJoe
Valued Poster
 
KCJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 8, 2010
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,128
Encounters: 38
Default NFL Players vs. Owners

Not that I care that much about millionaires or billionaires fighting over who gets richer, which side would you support if it made a difference.

I would choose the players, since it is they who we want to see play. Owners tried using scab players years ago, and attendance fell sharply. The owners use taxpayers dollars to subsidize their businesses and enjoy a special trust exemption so they have the market to themselves.

If it wasn't for the adverse economic impact it would have on our city, I'd like to see the lockout take place.

Owners like Dan Snyder of Washington get no sympathy from me.
KCJoe is offline   Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 01:23 PM   #2
Cheaper2buyit
Valued Poster
 
Cheaper2buyit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 16, 2010
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,295
Encounters: 10
Default

Players of course they get pretty beat up for enjoyment
Cheaper2buyit is offline   Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 03:20 PM   #3
SinsOfTheFlesh
Pending Age Verification
 
User ID: 54993
Join Date: Nov 16, 2010
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 2,989
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

I would side with the owners IF a win for the owners translated into lower ticket prices and other improvements that made professional football games more accessible to your average blue collar working guy. But we all know that isn't going to happen, so the issue really boils down to a bunch of greedy f*cks fighting over who gets the richest.
SinsOfTheFlesh is offline   Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 06:03 PM   #4
Gryphon
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Gryphon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 5, 2010
Location: Heart Attack & Vine
Posts: 521
Encounters: 13
Default

The whole reason the owners are trying to squeeze more revenue out of the players is because the owners can't agree amongst themselves on revenue sharing. Large market owners (Jones, Snyder, et. al.) don't currently have to share anything other than TV revenue, which gives them a much better cash flow situation than small market teams like Carolina, Buffalo, or Jacksonville. The owners as a group are whining about how much money they're losing on their (largely publicly financed) stadium deals but aren't willing to open their books to prove it--which leads me to assume they're lying through their teeth. They pay lip service to player safety but want to expand the season by two games while cutting players' salaries. And these are the same generous fellows who sold more Super Bowl tickets than they had seats and charged people $200 each to watch the game on TV in the parking lot. They've been planning a lockout for two years (when they signed the TV deal that just got shredded by a federal judge), so if games are missed it is purely and totally the owners' fault.
Gryphon is offline   Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 03:12 PM   #5
Longermonger
Valued Poster
 
Longermonger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: KC
Posts: 2,545
Encounters: 11
Default

CORPORATE WELFARE MONOPOLY

There's yer problem right there.

Where are my free market conservatives? I don't hear any cries of "SOCIALISM!!!". In fact, it's rather quiet.
Longermonger is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 09:08 AM   #6
lacrew_2000
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 6, 2010
Location: Topeka
Posts: 1,769
Encounters: 36
Default

I'm sure there are lots of angles to this; but, the one thing I have heard about is the two extra games.

Some have proposed eliminating a few of the pre-season games, to make it even....but I don't think they are even worth comparing.

The trend in the league is towards increasingly hard to comply with rules, about where you can hit a reciever, etc., in the name of safety...but then the league wants the players to go two extra games? The two don't seem to compute.

I'm sure there are more items in play than just this one; but, on this item, I side with the players. These guys really get beat up by the end of the season.

(BTW, I do think the push for a longer NFL season is a backdoor way to justify a longer college season in some people's minds, which would enable a college playoff season)
lacrew_2000 is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 09:15 AM   #7
lacrew_2000
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 6, 2010
Location: Topeka
Posts: 1,769
Encounters: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longermonger View Post
CORPORATE WELFARE MONOPOLY

There's yer problem right there.

Where are my free market conservatives? I don't hear any cries of "SOCIALISM!!!". In fact, it's rather quiet.
If you're complaining about cities paying out huge amounts of money for new stadiums, I'm right there with you. I don't like it, and think it should only be done if agreed to by the people via referendum.

If you're sounding off on the latest talking point that the NFL is socialist, so there!...I've always found this to be a very strange argument.
lacrew_2000 is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 03:38 PM   #8
KCJoe
Valued Poster
 
KCJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 8, 2010
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,128
Encounters: 38
Default

got these nice stadiums, might as well use them year-round. how bout a 52 game schedule. a never ending season like the NBA. the owners make a lot of money and get taxpayers to subsidise them, but it's just never enough.

I would side with the owners IF a win for the owners translated into lower ticket prices and other improvements that made professional football games more accessible to your average blue collar working guy.

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
That was a joke wasn't it?
KCJoe is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved