Deportation Flight to Costa Rica

[HDGristle]

135 on board

How many have criminal records? How many are from Asia?

Would it surprise you to know the answer is 0 for criminal record? That most of those on the flight are Asian?

Is this the expectation when you hear about prioritizing dangerous criminals and sending them back to where they came from?

Before we try to call them criminals, let's remember that illegal crossing is a civil offense misdemeanor and not a criminal offense. And considering that 65 of them are [redacted] it certainly doesn't seem like they're using the funding they have to effectively prioritize and target dangerous criminals.

Thoughts?

[Unique_Carpenter]

They catch who they catch.
Whomever caught gets shipped.

[Jacuzzme]

Only 135? Those are rookie numbers.

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Only 135? Those are rookie numbers.

Tells me you don't know how many are on the typical deportation flight

[onawbtngr546]

The boarder 'czar' recently said that it was 'hard to find' to many illegals to deport.


uhuh interesting.

[Mplay]

If you are here illegally gtfo. You are a criminal.

[Jacuzzme]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Tells me you don't know how many are on the typical deportation flight

These people never heard of barges?

[HDGristle]

Confident that Homan and Miller know what barges are. Not sure about Noem.

Bigger question is whether you understand the cost differential vs adherence to our bilateral agreements and other international commitments.

[Devo]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Confident that Homan and Miller know what barges are. Not sure about Noem.

Bigger question is whether you understand the cost differential vs adherence to our bilateral agreements and other international commitments.

Biggest question is why are you defending criminals?

Every one of them costs this country a MINIMUM of 100K per year, at the least if they are receiving free benefits, thats the only cost I care about, it what it costs the American Taxpayer.

[Devo]

Bigger question is whether you understand the cost differential vs adherence to our bilateral agreements and other international commitments.

I hear the sound of a full SWAMP speaking and I don't understand Swamp.

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by Devo

Biggest question is why are you defending criminals?

Every one of them costs this country a MINIMUM of 100K per year, at the least if they are receiving free benefits, thats the only cost I care about, it what it costs the American Taxpayer.

Was the crime a misdemeanor civil infraction?Where are the bad hombres, compadre? Not a single one. I find that very odd.

Don't you? And mostly Asian? Interesting as all fuck. No?

[Devo]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Was the crime a misdemeanor civil infraction?Where are the bad hombres, compadre? Not a single one. I find that very odd.

Don't you? And mostly Asian? Interesting as all fuck. No?

No, its clear all races and countries were sending people here, no surprise you caught a bunch of Asians.

The only thing we didn't get are Eskimos, AKA, Aleutians, they are all on welfare and have been for decades, no reason to come here for free shit.

And, I honestly mean that, its about the only race/group I haven't seen crossing the border.

If any foreigner is here without permission, they should be gone, simple enough?

[HDGristle]

But where are the bad hombres? And why Costa Rica?

[Chase7]

Why Costa Rica.

It’s a better half way house for illegals than Gauntanamo, possible illegals with friends in higher government places.
Issue is for the likes of these, Trump is getting rid of their former connections. May be interesting to see what corrupt Judge try’s to put a stop against this.

[HDGristle]

It's because they're friendly and willing to hold onto foreigners to continue to reap the benefits of being friendly with the U.S.

Wasn't a trick question. It's clear you don't understand what deportation agreements are in place and why they aren't just sending Asian deportees back to Asian countries