Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
George Spelvin 312
Starscream66 300
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 262
Top Posters
DallasRain71328
biomed167640
Yssup Rider62807
gman4454987
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49471
WTF48272
pyramider46416
bambino45243
The_Waco_Kid39824
CryptKicker37388
Mokoa36499
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Dr-epg34135

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-17-2012, 09:51 PM   #1
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default If A Republican Had Promised This . . . What Would You Say?

How would you have reacted in 2008 if any Republican ran promising to do the following?

1) Codify indefinite detention into law; (2) draw up a secret kill list of people, including American citizens, to assassinate without due process; (3) proceed with warrantless spying on American citizens; (4) prosecute Bush-era whistleblowers for violating state secrets; (5) reinterpret the War Powers Resolution such that entering a war of choice without a Congressional declaration is permissible; (6) enter and prosecute such a war; (7) institutionalize naked scanners and intrusive full body pat-downs in major American airports; (8) oversee a planned expansion of TSA so that its agents are already beginning to patrol American highways, train stations, and bus depots; (9) wage an undeclared drone war on numerous Muslim countries that delegates to the CIA the final call about some strikes that put civilians in jeopardy; (10) invoke the state-secrets privilege to dismiss lawsuits brought by civil-liberties organizations on dubious technicalities rather than litigating them on the merits; (11) preside over federal raids on medical marijuana dispensaries; (12) attempt to negotiate an extension of American troops in Iraq beyond 2011 (an effort that thankfully failed); (14) reauthorize the Patriot Act; (13) and select an economic team mostly made up of former and future financial executives from Wall Street firms that played major roles in the financial crisis.

--------

Well, that's a quote from The Atlantic, as discussed here.

http://suicidegirlsblog.com/blog/wha...-is-a-traitor/

It's an interesting question. If a Republican had made the above promises, how would you have reacted? Or a Democrat, for that matter?

CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 02-18-2012, 10:47 AM   #2
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Well, what would you think? Would you have voted for someone who promised this?
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 02-18-2012, 03:44 PM   #3
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

like everything else, some I agree with, some not. Just like I did when Sullivan ripped Bush a new asshole before the 04 elections ... aparently it didnt hamper the outcome of the 04 election, I doubt it will the 012 election either.

but by all means, beat the moot drum long and loud ... it helps take the focus off of the peabrain gop presidential candidates .... not

lol
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 02-18-2012, 09:53 PM   #4
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Ok, that's one vote in favor. Next?
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 02-18-2012, 10:15 PM   #5
daty/o
Valued Poster
 
daty/o's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 23, 2010
Location: Grapevine
Posts: 4,796
Encounters: 74
Default

No, I'm too busy listening to Republicans promising not to do things. "Read my lips"
daty/o is offline   Quote
Old 02-18-2012, 10:38 PM   #6
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

So which of the "promises"' do you approve?

I find it bizarre so many of you are ok with this. We will argue at length about whether Catholics should be forced to fund birth control, but giving the President the authority to arrest and indefinitely detain citizens on American soil - without due process - seems to be fine.

We have sunk to a new low. The media have mind numbed us to the point that we no longer even recognize freedom. You realize, I hope, that so long as that provision in the NDAA exists, there really aren't any freedoms we can count on.

This is truly sad. The terrorists have won, after all.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 12:44 AM   #7
Sa_artman
Valued Poster
 
Sa_artman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 13, 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,080
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
So which of the "promises"' do you approve?

I find it bizarre so many of you are ok with this. We will argue at length about whether Catholics should be forced to fund birth control, but giving the President the authority to arrest and indefinitely detain citizens on American soil - without due process - seems to be fine.

We have sunk to a new low. The media have mind numbed us to the point that we no longer even recognize freedom. You realize, I hope, that so long as that provision in the NDAA exists, there really aren't any freedoms we can count on.

This is truly sad. The terrorists have won, after all.
Did you really just cut and paste off a blog called 'suicide girl' and pass it off as some enlightened commentary? Tsk tsk
Sa_artman is offline   Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 07:39 AM   #8
Sidewinder
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 1,428
Default

"Sa artman", truth is truth, no matter where it is posted.

AND... the original source was "The Atlantic". Hardly a blog.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...ritics/251528/
Sidewinder is offline   Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 08:42 AM   #9
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

What part is not true?
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 11:57 AM   #10
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
What part is not true?

so which part/s are actual laws that kill our freedom?
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 02:55 PM   #11
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Well, CJ, since you asked.

1) Codify indefinite detention into law; (2) draw up a secret kill list of people, including American citizens, to assassinate without due process; (3) proceed with warrantless spying on American citizens; (4) prosecute Bush-era whistleblowers for violating state secrets; (5) reinterpret the War Powers Resolution such that entering a war of choice without a Congressional declaration is permissible; (6) enter and prosecute such a war; (7) institutionalize naked scanners and intrusive full body pat-downs in major American airports; (8) oversee a planned expansion of TSA so that its agents are already beginning to patrol American highways, train stations, and bus depots; (9) wage an undeclared drone war on numerous Muslim countries that delegates to the CIA the final call about some strikes that put civilians in jeopardy; (10) invoke the state-secrets privilege to dismiss lawsuits brought by civil-liberties organizations on dubious technicalities rather than litigating them on the merits; (11) preside over federal raids on medical marijuana dispensaries; (12) attempt to negotiate an extension of American troops in Iraq beyond 2011 (an effort that thankfully failed); (14) reauthorize the Patriot Act; (13) and select an economic team mostly made up of former and future financial executives from Wall Street firms that played major roles in the financial crisis.

1, 2, & 3 are the worst, but the others don't really promote freedom. So what about indefinite detention of citizens appeals to you most?
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 03:16 PM   #12
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

those are laws on the BOOKS? right now, as we speak?
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 03:20 PM   #13
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

So what about indefinite detention of citizens appeals to you most?


lets just say if we had been able to stop McVey before he blew up innocent women and children in OK, I wouldnt be opposed in the least detaining him for life just to insure he never attempted shit like that again.... wouldnt you COG?
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 03:51 PM   #14
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Yes, those are laws on the books now. Damn, pay attention!

The law gives the government the authority to indefinitely detain citizens on American soil without due process. You have no right to a lawyer, or trial. You can be scooped up, detained, and no one will know where you are or what happened to you. The government can do this without probable cause, they only need the suspicion that you might somehow be connected to "terrorism."

You're ok with that? Ok.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 03:57 PM   #15
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

A little something else for you, CJ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYhon...layer_embedded
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved