kicked off the board

[alupnit]

To all my hobby friends so long i will be getting the boot from this board by stick . Just wanna tell you all thanks for some wonderful times . To you stick i will never reveal my sources to you or anyone maybe you mods aught to figure out how some of us guys info we chat in pms about get back to providers .

[gimme_that]

Snitches get stitches. Lol Damn been a hell of a week for you man. Sorry to see you go so abruptly after this.

[MrGiz]

Between the public board posts by Lil Red & DaniellaDViante. . . it's not very difficult to put together a story which might be coming out of the Ladies Private areas... just sayin...

[Lea Madisson]

Originally Posted by alupnit

To all my hobby friends so long i will be getting the boot from this board by stick . Just wanna tell you all thanks for some wonderful times . To you stick i will never reveal my sources to you or anyone maybe you mods aught to figure out how some of us guys info we chat in pms about get back to providers .

Here is the sad thing about all this. The ladies who told you know that if you said anything about it on the boards and say where you got it from, then you will be asked who told you. They knew they put you at risk. They were also hoping that you would be the knight in shining armor and not reveal who they were. So, now, they get to continue to have the privileged of posting while you serve a period of exile.

On our side of the fence as Mods, we have to take action when something like this comes up. I will say the I think you are getting the bad end of the deal.

Of course, once the story started to grow, Mr Giz is right.

However, your true friends have put you in this position.

There are other ways... such as going to a Mod first before posting. Posting that you got remove from P411 but leave the Ladies Room out of it...

This is one of those times where you have to make a chose... and it is not an easy one because I do see your side... more than you know.

Put see my side too... I am upset that the ladies who told you did not have enough backbone to stand up and say it themselves.

Sometimes it is worth taking the heat.

And, if it is your stand not to reveal who your source(s) was... then I actually admire you. But, if you do what I think is the right thing, and tell us who is leaking (because they will leak again)... then I admire you just the same.

Lea

[urhuckleberry]

Originally Posted by alupnit

To all my hobby friends so long i will be getting the boot from this board by stick . Just wanna tell you all thanks for some wonderful times . To you stick i will never reveal my sources to you or anyone maybe you mods aught to figure out how some of us guys info we chat in pms about get back to providers .

Wait a minute. Some WK reveals ROS or Men's Lounge info to a provider and he is considered a lowlife dickhead... right? Male members get major pissed off when a provider is told what is in the ROS of a review.

So what's the difference when a provider reveals infoshare or powderoom info to some dude who then puts it out in the public forum?

Answer: There is no difference. It is a violation of board guidelines as well as a breach of the "circle of trust" which makes the private forums valuable to the community.

Folks, any member who reveals private information is not someone to admire. This whole mess started with a private posting which was brought into the public forum. It could have been handled privately in which case you wouldn't be reading this post now.

Finally to the OP: Don't blame your ban on Stick or any other mod. If you refuse to reveal sources of the private information, you brought the posting restriction upon yourself.

Huck

[dearhunter]

A small recommendation from a "BANNED" expert........suck it up and take the time out......it will be over before you know it.......most important.....learn how to say what needs to be said without crossing that line......ijs

[Lea Madisson]

Excellent Advice, Deartard!!

Smooch!

Lea

[dearhunter]

heh

[jl11]

Wow us men are dawgs, look at that dawg holding down that stuffed animal. Go figure.

[Chica Chaser]

It amusing the integrity of the ladies that leaked info to you. It appears they are perfectly willing to hang you out to dry.

[bodilly]

Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

It amusing the integrity of the ladies that leaked info to you. It appears they are perfectly willing to hang you out to dry.

maybe it was just one lady.

[luvme98]

This just sucks all the way around.... i

[secret.dreamer]

Sorry to hear about your troubles. Tell the mods who leaked whatever info to you. You may still be banned but so will the individual in question.

[Metryguy]

Originally Posted by urhuckleberry

Wait a minute. Some WK reveals ROS or Men's Lounge info to a provider and he is considered a lowlife dickhead... right? Male members get major pissed off when a provider is told what is in the ROS of a review.

So what's the difference when a provider reveals infoshare or powderoom info to some dude who then puts it out in the public forum?

Answer: There is no difference. It is a violation of board guidelines as well as a breach of the "circle of trust" which makes the private forums valuable to the community.

Folks, any member who reveals private information is not someone to admire. This whole mess started with a private posting which was brought into the public forum. It could have been handled privately in which case you wouldn't be reading this post now.

Finally to the OP: Don't blame your ban on Stick or any other mod. If you refuse to reveal sources of the private information, you brought the posting restriction upon yourself.

Huck

I agree with everything above, but it doesn't seem like it is enforced both ways. A provider recently posted in her ad that she is staying over because of her recent "magnificent" review. Without the ROS, the review is not very magnificent. My question is how did she know it was such a glowing review in the first place? I, along with every other member, knows that either the provider herself has PA or is being fed the info from a WK. I realize that there is probably a lot more to this story than just info sharing, but to use it as the reason for his banning seems a bit inconsistant.

[Metryguy]

Originally Posted by urhuckleberry

Wait a minute. Some WK reveals ROS or Men's Lounge info to a provider and he is considered a lowlife dickhead... right? Male members get major pissed off when a provider is told what is in the ROS of a review.

So what's the difference when a provider reveals infoshare or powderoom info to some dude who then puts it out in the public forum?

Answer: There is no difference. It is a violation of board guidelines as well as a breach of the "circle of trust" which makes the private forums valuable to the community.

Folks, any member who reveals private information is not someone to admire. This whole mess started with a private posting which was brought into the public forum. It could have been handled privately in which case you wouldn't be reading this post now.

Finally to the OP: Don't blame your ban on Stick or any other mod. If you refuse to reveal sources of the private information, you brought the posting restriction upon yourself.

Huck

I agree with everything above, but it doesn't seem like it is enforced both ways. A provider recently posted in her ad that she is staying over because of her recent "magnificent" review. Without the ROS, the review is not very magnificent. My question is how did she know it was such a glowing review in the first place? I, along with every other member, knows that either the provider herself has PA or is being fed the info from a WK. I realize that there is probably a lot more to this story than just info sharing, but to use it as the reason for his banning seems a bit inconsistent.