https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...MiJ?li=BBnb7Kz
 © Getty Images  A man holds a flag and a gun at a Second Amendment rally   Throughout the course of the  coronavirus pandemic, the civil liberties and constitutional rights of  Americans have been pushed to the side as simple conveniences or  privileges and violated by overreaching federal and local governments.
             
 Across the country and in violation of the First  Amendment, people have been barred from attending church services or  peaceably assembling.
"Many policies that  would be unthinkable in regular times have become commonplace in recent  weeks, and we do not want to unduly interfere with the important efforts  of state and local officials to protect the public. But the  Constitution is not suspended in times of crisis. We must therefore be  vigilant to ensure its protections are preserved, at the same time that  the public is protected," former Attorney General William Barr wrote in  an April memo to the assistant attorney general for civil rights and  U.S. attorneys around the country.
But  under the guise of public health, the Biden administration is gearing up  to go after the Second Amendment. After all, Biden promised during the  campaign to "dedicate the brightest scientific minds to solving the gun  violence public health epidemic."
Now, his administration is working to get the job done through the executive branch.
"When  the president was the vice president in the Obama-Biden administration,  he helped put in place 23 executive actions to combat gun violence.  It's one of the levers that we can use," White House press secretary Jen  Psaki said during a recent briefing. In her own view, Psaki believes  guns should be "taken" and that lawful gun owners should be registered  with the federal government.
As the old  Washington saying goes, personnel is policy and Biden has put the  perfect people in place to do the job without Congress.
Newly  confirmed Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, who also served as former  President Obama's surgeon general, has a history of anti-Second  Amendment advocacy under the guise of public health. His confirmation in  2014 nearly failed on the issue after vote on his nomination was pushed  back.
"Tired of politicians playing  politics w/ guns, putting lives at risk b/c they're scared of NRA. Guns  are a health care issue. #debatehealth," Murthy tweeted in 2012.
Murthy  is also the co-founder of Doctors for America, an organization whose  mission includes combatting "gun violence" as a "public health issue."  Their advocacy, which the group says is #inourlane, includes asking  patients - adults and children - about firearms lawfully owned and kept  inside the home. They've also lobbied Congress to ban certain types of  commonly owned firearms and accessories.
"Doctor-patient  discussions about firearm safety are critical to educating patients,  but physicians need to feel prepared and confident to lead those  conversations," Doctors for America training and activism materials  state. "Health is the sphere where our voices have the greatest  authority and impact."
"Gun violence is a  public health epidemic. Doctors can do their part to prevent tragedies  by talking to patients about gun safety. #GunSafetyDoctor," they use as a  sample for activists to tweet.
Democrats,  anti-Second Amendment groups and the White House have already declared a  new "public health" crisis. Now, the Department of Justice is ready to  use the strength of law enforcement to enforce executive decisions.
"The  president is a strong supporter of gun control and has been an advocate  all his professional life on this question. The role of the Justice  Department is to advance the policy program of the administration as  long as it is consistent with the law," Attorney General Merrick Garland  said during his Senate confirmation hearing. "Where there is room under  the law for the president's policies to be pursued, I think the  president is entitled to pursue them."
Room  under the law is one thing, but what about room under a national  emergency or for the sake of public health? How far will government  bureaucrats be willing to go in order to save the public from the  "health threat" of ammunition magazines, modern sporting rifles or other  firearms?
As we've seen with the  coronavirus pandemic, the government has been more than happy to violate  individual rights for the sake of public health. They've had a test run  with the First Amendment and will soon come for the Second.
Pavlich is the editor for Townhall.com and a Fox News contributor.
i believe Pavlich is correct - the fiden corrupt crime cabal will try anything to foist gun confiscation on America. 
Most of America - except the passive fools who desire a controlled nanny state that 'takes care of them' - are fed up with the economic destruction and violation of civil liberties endured during the pandemic - and the hypocritical behavior of DPST nomenklatura - " do what i say - Not what i do" idiots.
Let them try to enforce another lockdown and confiscation of legal weapons from law-abiding  citizens - using shill 'experts' fake testimony and Lies. 
Fuck them and their crime cabal - resist - Do not give up One's legal weapons - give beto the lead end as he deserves when the criminal fiden cabal tries to confiscate weapons from law-abiding Amemricans. 
deluded Groupthink and doublespeak DPST minions may now screech and howl  in jackboot lockstep with their marxist enslavers.