https://townhall.com/columnists/denn...-left-n2598406
   Source: AP Photo/Charles Krupa, File
 Source: AP Photo/Charles Krupa, File
 
 
    
  
   
       
 
   Trending
 
 
 
   
  To most readers of this column, the question is absurd. The reason is  not because the question is, in fact, absurd; it is because most  readers of this column are conservative, and many are religious.
Am I implying that most leftists do not believe stealing is wrong?
Yes, I am.
As  incredible as this assertion is to just about all religious people and  virtually all conservatives, most leftists do not believe stealing is  wrong. Since I always draw a distinction between those on the Left and  liberals, let me add that I suspect most liberals think stealing is  wrong. But it almost doesn't matter because they vote for people who do  not think it is.
One proof is the passage of Proposition 47, a  California ballot initiative passed in 2014, under which theft of less  than $950 in goods is treated as a nonviolent misdemeanor and rarely  prosecuted. As a result, in Democrat-run California cities such as San  Francisco and Los Angeles, retail theft has soared.
Walgreens  stores in San Francisco are racking up four times the average amount of  theft in Walgreens stores across the country; spending on security  guards in San Francisco is 35 times more than the chain's average in  other cities. Walgreens has been forced to close 22 stores in the city  since 2016.
As reported in the San Francisco Chronicle: "The  Safeway located in San Francisco's Castro neighborhood ... was a  longstanding, 24-hour fixture in San Francisco's Castro neighborhood.  But as of last week, the store's hours have been cut back to 6 a.m. to 9  p.m ... A Safeway spokesperson (said) that the cutbacks are 'due to an  increasing amount of theft at the store.'"
   
  
CARTOONS | 
AF Branco
   View Cartoon 
 
 
Further proof that the Left doesn't consider theft wrong -- at  least when committed by a person of color -- was an interview broadcast  on NPR last year with the author of a book titled "In Defense of  Looting." The NPR interviewer threw only softball questions to the  author.
In the last election, Los Angeles voters elected San  Francisco's previous district attorney, George Gascon, as Los Angeles's  district attorney. It was Los Angeles's way of declaring that stealing  is not wrong. And it is worth noting that it is not only racial  minorities and the poor who make these elections possible; it is also  prosperous whites. The Los Angeles DA is a wealthy white, and he was  supported by a white billionaire, George Soros.
It is hard to  believe that millions of Americans do not deem stealing from stores  morally wrong, so let's try to explain how this has come about.
Reason  No. 1 is moral relativism. For as long as there has been a Left, it has  rejected moral absolutes. As the great British historian, Paul Johnson,  pointed out a half-century ago in his magnum opus, "Modern Times," the  secular world applied the relativism of the natural sciences to  morality.
Reason No. 2 is the reason for reason number one: the  collapse of the Judeo-Christian value system and the accompanying  abandonment of, and often disdain for, biblical ethics. Biblical  morality posits moral absolutes -- meaning that stealing is wrong for  everyone, certainly people of every color. Yes, one can offer a biblical  defense of a starving man stealing food for his starving family. But  that is hardly what is happening in San Francisco and other American  cities.
   
 
Reason No. 3 is Marxist morality. From Marx to the  present, Marxism has divided the world not between right and wrong, but  between economic classes. Therefore, it is morally acceptable for  members of the poorer classes to steal from members of the more affluent  classes. This notion has made its way into young people's minds for  decades. About 30 years ago, I spoke to students from four Cleveland  high schools. I asked them to raise their hand if they would steal  something they really wanted from a department store if they were  certain they would not get caught. Nearly all the students raised their  hands. When I asked some of them to justify their reasoning, they all  said the same thing: they wouldn't steal from a mom-and-pop store, but  they would steal from a department store. It is OK to steal from "the  rich."
   

  Recommended
 
 Liberal Reporter's Thread Hurls a Brick in the Face of CNN and Their Anti-Misinformation Crusade    Matt Vespa 
 
 
 
 Reason No. 4 is leftists' view of nonwhites, especially blacks, a  view that conservatives have never shared. Leftists truly believe that  blacks are intellectually and morally inferior to whites. The evidence?  They do not believe blacks should be held to the same intellectual and  moral standards to which leftists hold whites. Leftists do not defend  whites who steal, and they hold whites to higher intellectual standards.  Leftists do not argue for lowering math standards for whites, only for  blacks.
   
 
The bottom line is the Left is immoral. That is why it defends stealing.
Dennis  Prager is a nationally syndicated radio talk-show host and columnist.  His latest book, published by Regnery in May 2019, is "The Rational  Bible," a commentary on the book of Genesis. His film, "No Safe Spaces,"  was released to home entertainment nationwide on September 15, 2020. He  is the founder of Prager University and may be contacted at  dennisprager.com.
Comment - a qualification for Mr. Prager's article - which is accurate adn good reading.
the Democraticomunists do believe that stealing from others is just fine - unless One steals from teh nomenklatura - pelosi, schymer, AOC, etc - then count on prosecution. 
It is teh usual democraticommunist Hypocrisy. 
of course - teh democraticommunist party nomenklatura - are teh greatest Thieves of all time - fiden adn ukraine, China:, Pelosi and her stock market husband,: fauxahonts and harvard, : adn On adn On - they are all prodessional thieves who line their own pockets at others expense and torment. 
Buck fiden
From my cold dead hands!