https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...id-wa-n2598243
       
 
  It's one of the stories that could tilt today’s gubernatorial  election in Virginia. The rapes that occurred in the school district in  Loudoun County have become national news. It would have been news eons  ago if it weren’t for political bias, but you all know that. A  14-year-old girl was raped in the bathroom in May by a gender fluid  student. That student was not charged and then allowed to attend a  different school, only to attack another student there. It also seems  like the school board covered up the incident. It’s led to students  walking out, angered that they were never told of a predator in their  midst. Regarding the first attack, a judge recently ruled there was  sufficient evidence to conclude that a sexual assault occurred. Yet, the  first student was said to have had previous consensual sexual contact  with the accused gender-fluid attacker, so that means she was asking for  it, right? No, but a recent 
New York Times op-ed  that seeks to clarify what’s going on in Northern Virginia seems to  really play into the victim-blaming trope. And I thought the Left said  we needed to believe all women, right:
On  June 22, a middle-aged plumber named Scott Smith was dragged, lip  bleeding and hands cuffed behind his back, from a raucous school board  meeting in Loudoun County, Va. According to the local newspaper Loudoun  Now, he’d been swearing loudly at another parent and leaning toward her  with a clenched fist when the police tackled him and pulled him outside.  He’d eventually be convicted of disorderly conduct and resisting arrest  and given a suspended 10-day jail sentence.
Smith’s image quickly  went viral as a symbol of the sort of school board strife breaking out  all over America. The National School Boards Association, writing to  President Biden to request help dealing with the “growing number of  threats of violence and acts of intimidation” directed at school board  members, included Smith’s arrest in a list of examples.
Soon,  however, Smith revealed why he’d been so distraught. In an interview  with The Daily Wire, a website co-founded by the conservative wunderkind  Ben Shapiro, Smith said that his ninth-grade daughter had been sexually  assaulted in a school bathroom by a boy wearing a skirt. Smith was  opposed to a proposed policy allowing trans kids to use bathrooms  aligned with their gender identities, believing it made girls like his  daughter vulnerable.
[…]
Not surprisingly, the story  ricocheted around the right. Conservatives have long argued that letting  trans girls and women into women’s bathrooms would lead to sexual  predation, and now that seemed to have happened. They’ve argued that  wokeness is a form of tyranny, and in Smith they had a man who seemed to  have been tyrannized because his family’s lived experience posed a  threat to trans ideology.
If they had it all wrong, it’s almost hard to blame them — the narrative was too irresistible.
[…]
But  this week, during a juvenile court hearing, a fuller picture of Smith’s  daughter’s ordeal emerged. She suffered something atrocious. It had  nothing at all to do, however, with trans bathroom policies. Instead,  like many women and girls, she was a victim of relationship violence.
Smith’s  daughter testified that she’d previously had two consensual sexual  encounters with her attacker in the school bathroom. On the day of her  assault, they’d agreed to meet up again. “The evidence was that the girl  chose that bathroom, but her intent was to talk to him, not to engage  in sexual relations,” Biberaj, whose office prosecuted the case, told  me. The boy, however, expected sex and refused to accept the girl’s  refusal. As the The Washington Post reported, she testified, “He flipped  me over. I was on the ground and couldn’t move and he sexually  assaulted me.”
The boy was indeed wearing a skirt, but that skirt  didn’t authorize him to use the girls’ bathroom. As Amanda Terkel  reported in HuffPost, the school district’s trans-inclusive bathroom  policies were approved only in August, more than two months after the  assault. This was not, said Biberaj, someone “identifying as transgender  and going into the girls’ bathroom under the guise of that.”
On  Monday, the boy received the juvenile court equivalent of a guilty  verdict. The case dealing with the second attack he is accused of will  be decided in November.
[…]
Even as the facts of this case  have come out, the damage done by all the disinformation about it will  be hard to undo. “Once the politics are over, we’re still dealing with  the destruction,” said Biberaj, who wonders how her community is  supposed to heal. “You can’t always successfully bring people back to  say, ‘I know this is what you were told, but look what happened in court  under oath.’”
A sad and complicated truth is probably no match for an exquisitely useful lie.
The  piece is titled “The Right’s Big Lie About a Sexual Assault in  Virginia.” Where’s the lie? The girl was raped. The judge ruled that it  occurred. It’s written in the piece, but the two previous consensual  sexual encounters make this a…non-rape? This is classic narrative  protecting. The rape doesn’t matter. It’s about ensuring transgender or  inclusive bathroom policies are not targeted. Screw the girl, right? 
   

  Recommended
 
 Top Doctor Says New CDC Study on Natural Immunity Is 'Highly Flawed'   Katie Pavlich 
 
 
 
 This is a rather lengthy piece that pretty much voices frustration  that liberals got caught being morons about sexual assault policy and  the overall curriculum in schools. The sexual assault incident doesn’t  help matters concerning narrative maintenance. The board seems to have  covered it up and there’s no pivot, except for seemingly insinuating  that because this girl had past consensual contact—she wasn’t really  raped. That’s appalling, but par for the course for The New York Times.  We all remember Gloria Steinem’s op-ed that absolved Bill Clinton of all  past sexual assault and misconduct allegations because he was liberal, a  Democrat, and pro-abortion. 
It’s no different here. 
What's  rich is that we're the ones peddling a false narrative. No. It's the  liberal media that's trying to gloss over the rapes. We're telling the  truth. These are the facts. Even now, the elite media cannot write about  sexual assault in a way that's either accurate or with sensitivity.
the 'hardly elite' LSM Ny Crimes adn Lies - is all about ideology Uber alles. 
they resort to 'victim -blaming'  to preserve their own biased, slanted, bigoted view of the American Peoples 
Buck teh LSM and fiden and their Lies - they are all about groupthink and dodublespeak.  
Orwell was prescient
From my cold dead hands!