Trump wants to take guns away from Transgender Americans, but...

[HDGristle]

I think it would be far more worthwhile to just take guns away from the closeted conservatives who find them attractive.

We can add it to the background check. If you identify as conservative and pop even a little chub when shown a shit ton of transgender smut your application is denied and and you have to turn in your guns.

What say you, the fine people, of the Pittsburgh stump?

[Charley3]

I noticed a lot of mass murderers post pictures of their military grade weapons so I did a little internet search as to why and this is what AI had to say:

“In many cases, mass murderers post their weapons on social media to seek notoriety, influence copycats, amplify their extremist ideologies, and generate attention for their future violent acts. This behavior provides a public platform for their beliefs and grievances, and is part of the larger psychological profile of many mass shooters.”

So maybe we should look at the obvious and take guns away from the wacko’s that think this is impressive

[txdot-guy]

If you really want to stop most mass shootings take guns away from men. Taking guns away from transgender people won’t make a dent in gun violence.

More than 98% of mass shootings have been committed by men, according to The Violence Project. This nonpartisan research group tracks U.S. mass shooting data dating back more than a half-century.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...e/11550575002/

Since 1982, an astonishing 149 mass shootings have been carried out in the United States by male shooters. In contrast, only four mass shootings (defined by the source as a single attack in a public place in which four or more victims were killed) have been carried out by women.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/...oter-s-gender/

[Jacuzzme]

This is a good idea. Mentally ill folks shouldn’t own guns, clearly a man who thinks they’re a woman or visa-versa fits that description. Those who vote for a democrat obviously qualify also, but they’re afraid of big scary guns already so banning them isn’t necessary.

[tommy156]

Lol. The notion that Democrats don't own guns is hilariously off-base. But you go ahead and keep thinking that.

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

This is a good idea. Mentally ill folks shouldn’t own guns, clearly a man who thinks they’re a woman or visa-versa fits that description. Those who vote for a democrat obviously qualify also, but they’re afraid of big scary guns already so banning them isn’t necessary.

I know plenty of Dems, Independents and Republicans with guns that make you salivate. Now... what about the conservative tranny chasers among you? Take their guns?

[Green_Mountain]

I don’t know how anybody thinks pumping somebody full of hormones and gun ownership is a good idea.

Oh wait I do know. Crazy cultist leftists.

[Green_Mountain]

Who commits mass shootings?

2015–2025 public incidents (4+ killed), per million:

1.Trans/NB (Bio Male) – 0.769
2.Trans/NB (Bio Female) – 0.667
3.Asian Men – 0.408
4. Black Men – 0.198
5.White Men – 0.176
6.Asian Women – 0.097
7.Hispanic Men – 0.094


https://x.com/CBHeresy/status/1960773951992258860

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Green_Mountain

Who commits mass shootings?

2015–2025 public incidents (4+ killed), per million:

1.Trans/NB (Bio Male) – 0.769
2.Trans/NB (Bio Female) – 0.667
3.Asian Men – 0.408
4. Black Men – 0.198
5.White Men – 0.176
6.Asian Women – 0.097
7.Hispanic Men – 0.094


https://x.com/CBHeresy/status/1960773951992258860

Totally fake numbers. I can’t believe we’re still having to refute this.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/...041015627.html

Fact Check: FAKE Viral Chart Misrepresents Data About The Portion of Transgender People Involved In Mass Shootings

[HDGristle]

Busted

[tommy156]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Totally fake numbers. I can’t believe we’re still having to refute this.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/...041015627.html

Fact Check: FAKE Viral Chart Misrepresents Data About The Portion of Transgender People Involved In Mass Shootings

The MAGA insanity and denial of reality continues. Absolutely bonkers what some people will believe.

[Green_Mountain]

From a link posted in the article posted by TxDot.

“Those shooting were 52.3% White, 20.9% Black, 8.1% Latino, 6.4% Asian, 4.2% Middle Eastern, and 1.8% Native American.”

Sorry but these numbers don’t support your MAGA fetish. Especially compared to general US population break down by race.

Also via link in txdots original link, “Mental health issues were common among those who engaged in mass shootings”

Which leads to this nugget. “Recent studies show significant mental health disparities for transgender individuals compared to cisgender populations, though exact percentages vary by study and definition of mental illness. A 2025 survey by Plume Clinic found 70.2% of over 1,500 transgender respondents reported a lifetime diagnosis of anxiety or depression”

Appreciate the fact check only to provide data points that support the original point those on the right are making.

[HDGristle]

Topic is whether we take guns away from closeted conservative tranny chasers.

[Devo]

Well, I'm here to fuck with the heads of both sides, and, I don't think ANYONE should be outright prevented from owning a firearm, even if Trans.

HOWEVER, you cannot overlook the fact that the most recent school shootings have featured trans shooters, just like after 911 you couldn't point your finger at any Muzzy, and say, "BAD MUZZY", just because a bunch of Muzzsies took over planes on 911.

That would be profiling, wouldn't it, and nobody wants that, but, I am in the unique position to not sell a firearm to whomever I choose.

So, if two people are looking at a gun, and it appears to be a straw purchase, I'll stop the transfer, and if in another case, they were trans, I would do my best to stop someone who didn't seem safe to have a firearm.

There was in interview with the guy at the gun shop who sold the Trans Catholic murderer a revolver, and he explained that it, looked at many guns, had knowledge of the subject and hung around for 45 minutes and seemed normal.

OK, this thing still passes the background check and gets the guns, EVERYTHING YOU WANTED TO HAPPEN TO INSURE GUN SAFETY HAPPENED.

The ONLY way this person is stopped is by its medical professionals and they have been given a pass, to disregard mental illness, and THEY FAILED to alert the authorities, as likely did its parents.

Just like 911, you ignore intentionally the actual SUBJECTS, and do diaper searches on old white ladies.

IF there IS a PROBLEM, focus your attention on THEM, but you won't, just like you ignore the fact that 80 percent of all murders in Pittsburgh are black on black.

Don't come here and make silly moot points about conservatives, stupid childish attacks, and continue to ignore the problem(S), at hand.

[Devo]

Originally Posted by Charley3

I noticed a lot of mass murderers post pictures of their military grade weapons so I did a little internet search as to why and this is what AI had to say:

“In many cases, mass murderers post their weapons on social media to seek notoriety, influence copycats, amplify their extremist ideologies, and generate attention for their future violent acts. This behavior provides a public platform for their beliefs and grievances, and is part of the larger psychological profile of many mass shooters.”

So maybe we should look at the obvious and take guns away from the wacko’s that think this is impressive

AI, Jeebus.............

But hell froze over, I agree, take their weapons, and copy cat killers have been around for years, but, please, can you provide a list of the people who ADMIRE this latest whack?

Good idea, take their guns away, but HOW do you find them?

Waiting...................