| Valued Poster 
				 
                
				Join Date: Dec 30, 2009 Location: Houston 
					Posts: 952
				      | 
				 Salute the Danish Flag - it's a Symbol of Western Freedom 
 
			
			http://newenglishreview.org/blog_dis.../blog_id/29466
Saturday, 4 September 2010 
  			 				Susan MacAllen: Denmark -- Where Tolerance Is The State Religion -- Wakes Up
				 				  Salute the Danish Flag - it's a Symbol of  Western Freedom By Susan MacAllen
 "In 1978-9, I was living and studying in Denmark. But in 1978 even in Copenhagen, one didn't see Muslim immigrants.
 
 The  Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went  out of  its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new  brand  of socialist liberalism, one in development since the  conservatives had  lost power in 1929. It was a system where no worker  had to struggle to  survive, where one ultimately could count upon the  state as in, perhaps,  no other western nation at the time.
 
 The rest of Europe saw  the Scandinavians as free-thinking, progressive  and infinitely generous  in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low  crime rates, devotion to  the environment, a superior educational system  and a history of  humanitarianism.
 
 Denmark was also most generous in its  immigration policies.  It offered  the best welcome in Europe to the new  immigrant: generous welfare  payments from first arrival plus additional  perks in transportation;  housing; and education. It was determined to  set a world example for  inclusiveness and multiculturalism.  How could  it have predicted that  one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in  a newspaper would  spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the  streets . . . all  because its commitment to multi-culturalism would come  back to bite?
 
 By the1990s the growing urban Muslim population  was obvious, and its  unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was  obvious.  The  immigrants had settled into Muslim - exclusive enclaves.  As the Muslim  leadership became more vocal about what they considered  the decadence  of Denmark's liberal way of life, the Danes, once so  welcoming, began  to feel slighted.  Many Danes had begun to see Islam as  incompatible  with their long-standing values: belief in personal  liberty, free  speech, equality for women, and a deep pride in Danish  heritage and  history.
 
 An article by Daniel Pipes and Lars  Hedegaard, in which they  forecasted, accurately, that the growing  immigrant problem in Denmark  would explode. In the article they  reported:
 
 "Muslim immigrants constitute 5% of the population but consume upwards of 40% of the welfare spending."
 
 "Muslims  are only 4% of Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a  majority of  the country's convicted rapists . . . an especially  combustible issue  given that practically all the female victims are  non-Muslim. Similar,  if lesser disproportions are found in other  crimes."
 
 "Over  time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish  less to mix  with the indigenous population.  A recent survey finds  that only 5% of  young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane."[thank god]
 
 "Forced  marriages, promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male  cousin in  the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes  on pain of  death, is one problem.:
 
 "Muslim leaders openly declare their  goal of introducing  Islamic law once Denmark 's Muslim population grows  large enough, a  not-that-remote prospect. If present trends persist, one  sociologist  estimates that every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40  years will be  Muslim.'"
 
 It is easy to understand why a growing  number of Danes would feel that  Muslim immigrants show little respect  for Danish values and laws.
 
 An example is the phenomenon common  to other European countries and  Canada: some Muslims in Denmark who  opted to leave the Muslim faith  have been murdered in the name of Islam,  while others hide in fear for  their lives.  Jews are also threatened  and harassed openly by Muslim  leaders in Denmark, a country where once  Christian citizens worked to  smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews  by night to Sweden during  the Nazis occupation in World War II. I think  of my Danish friend Elsa,  who as a teen-ager, had dreaded crossing the  street to the bakery  every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi  soldiers, and I wonder  what she would say today.
 
 In 2001,  Denmark elected the most conservative government in  some 70 years: one  that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about  liberal unfettered  immigration. Today, Denmark has the strictest  immigration policies in  Europe.  Its effort to protect itself has been  met with accusations of   'racism' by liberal media across Europe, even  as other governments  struggle to right the social problems wrought by  years of lax  immigration.
 
 If you wish to become Danish, you must attend  three years of language  classes. You must pass a test on Denmark 's  history and culture, and a  Danish language test.
 
 -- You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship.
 
 -- You must demonstrate an intent to work, and have a job waiting.
 
 
 If  you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must both be over 24  years  of age, however you won't find it so easy anymore to move your  friends  and family to Denmark with you.
 
 You will not be allowed to  build a mosque in Copenhagen. Although your  children have a choice of  some 30 Arabic culture and language schools  in Denmark, they will be  strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish  society in ways that past  immigrants weren't.
 
 In 2006, the Danish minister for  employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen,   spoke publicly of the burden of  Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare  system, and it was horrifying:  the government's welfare committee had  calculated that if immigration  from Third World countries were blocked,  75 percent of the cuts needed  to sustain the huge welfare system in  coming decades would be  unnecessary.  In other words, the welfare  system, as it existed, was  being exploited by immigrants to the point  of eventually bankrupting the  government. "We are simply forced to  adopt a new policy on immigration.  . . . the calculations of the  welfare committee are terrifying and show  how unsuccessful the  integration of immigrants has been up to now," he  said.
 
 A large thorn in the side of Denmark's imams is the  Minister of  Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. She makes no  bones about  the new policy toward immigration, "The number of foreigners  coming to  the country makes a difference'.  Hvilshoj says, "There is an  inverse  correlation between how many come here and how well we can  receive the  foreigners that come." And on Muslim immigrants needing to  demonstrate a  willingness to blend in, "In my view, Denmark should be a  country with  room for different cultures and religions. Some values,  however, are  more important than others. We refuse to question  democracy, equal  rights, and freedom of speech."
 
 Hvilshoj has  paid a price for her show of backbone. Perhaps to test her  resolve, the  leading radical imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu  Laban, demanded  that the government pay blood money to the family of a  Muslim who was  murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the  family's thirst for  revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj  dismissed his  demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of  retribution  money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is  done in a  Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark.
 
 The  Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her   husband and children slept.  All managed to escape unharmed, but she  and  her family were moved to a secret location and she and other  ministers  were assigned bodyguards for the first time in a country  where such  murderous violence was once so scarce.
 
 Her government has slid  to the right, and her borders have tightened.  Many believe that what  happens in the next decade will determine  whether Denmark survives as a  bastion of good living, humane thinking  and social responsibility, or  whether it becomes a nation at civil war  with supporters of Sharia law.
 
 Meanwhile,  Canadians clamor for stricter immigration policies, and  demand an end  to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to  live on the  public dole.  As we in Canada look at the enclaves of  Muslims amongst  us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare  live on our  taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our  traditions,  participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our  language,  appreciate our history.  We would do well to look to Denmark,  and say a  prayer for her future and for our own."
 
 |