Git Yer Red Hots! Red hot lies! Fresh off da presses!!!

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

First of all - how DO you do it?...

Mostly I read the internets, mainly of the free and fair press, then cross check it against known narratives of the Left-Wing nuts press to see how hard they are trying to cover them up.
EX: You can see where I did that with post #157 and #182.

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

...And second — how would you know?

Then I post the most egregious ones here to verify them.
The Left-Wing nuts here seldom disappoint.

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by Mort Watt

And third....who really gives a fuck about the BBC?...

I use to think they were pretty credible - back in the day. But I don't much give a flip about them these days, because of things like: Blatant Election Interference.
I'm sure you read about it, otherwise you wouldn't be commenting here.
(I'll highlight the relevant part for ya)

Gordon Rayner Associate Editor
03 November 2025 3:19pm GMT

The BBC doctored a Donald Trump speech by making him appear to encourage the Capitol Hill riot, according to an internal whistleblowing memo seen by The Telegraph.

A Panorama programme, broadcast a week before the US election, “completely misled” viewers by showing the president telling supporters he was going to walk to the Capitol with them to “fight like hell”, when in fact he said he would walk with them “to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard”.

The “mangled” footage was highlighted in a 19-page dossier on BBC bias, which was compiled by a recent member of the corporation’s standards committee and is now circulating in government departments.

The dossier said the programme made the US president “‘say’ things [he] never actually said” by splicing together footage from the start of his speech with something he said nearly an hour later.

It claimed senior executives and the BBC’s chairman had ignored and dismissed a string of serious complaints raised by the corporation’s own standards watchdog...

[Mort Watt]

Originally Posted by Lantern2814

... My in-laws are Jewish so I'll say whatever I want about the treatment they receive from YOUR side.....

I guess you chose the second option: "I'll have the whine, please."

You coulda stepped up. Or just backed off, let this all go. Instead, you continue.

You just don't get it. Your familial heritage does NOT give you the freedom to "say whatever you want"...to mis-use the phrase "Anti-Semitism." Or to unjustifiably call someone an Anti-Semite.

I would argue the exact opposite: you have an obligation to your family to be very careful in how you use that phrase. And to oppose the mis-use of it by others.

"Crying Wolf" about Anti-Semitism is a massive danger. Not just to Jews. To everyone. It desensitizes the entire idea.

MAGA has been a huge promoter of this tactic. They are using it to further divide us. And you have blundered right into it.

And my prediction is that you will continue in this vein, using it to vent your uncontrollable hatred on me and "MY Side."

Stop. Break the cycle.

If you don't want to, at least start another fucking thread.

[Lantern2814]

Originally Posted by Mort Watt

I chose the second option: "I'll have the whine, please."

I coulda stepped up. Or just backed off, let this all go. Instead, I continue.

I just don't get it.

And my prediction is that I will continue in this vein, using it to vent my uncontrollable hatred on you

That's much more accurate. Since you didn't understand the post, I am not Jewish. My brothers-in-law are. Thus YOU don't get to speak as if you know anything about their lives. Your hatred and anger mark you. You fall for everything the media prints about Trump and never question it. Like a good little sheep.

[Mort Watt]

Originally Posted by Lantern2814

That's much more accurate. Since you didn't understand the post....

Thank you for validating my prediction above.

You argue like a child. Playing childish games editing my post and calling me childish names.

I repeat: grow the fuck up.