Illegal arrest?

[WTF]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...doing-her-job/

Sounds like it to me. Nurses lives matter!


.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Rule Of Law! The nurse did good by Standing up for the Constitution...

[grean]

That's horrible! Can we all agree the police officer was way way way out of bounds here?

[WTF]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Rule Of Law! The nurse did good by Standing up for the Constitution...

Holy chit Batman, we agree on something !


.


.

[Stockinglover]

Typical fucking pig

[dilbert firestorm]

looks like the officer wasn't aware of supreme court 2016 ruling on blood samples.

looks like a failure of training and communication.

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by WTF

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...doing-her-job/

Sounds like it to me. Nurses lives matter!


.

Most certainly that's an illegal arrest. AND THE officer in charge who ordered him to collect the blood KNOWING there was no warrant, PC or consent, along with the other officer who came up on the scene and said "YUP, arrest that bitch".. ALL NEED To lose their badge...

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

looks like the officer wasn't aware of supreme court 2016 ruling on blood samples.

How long as he been on the fucking job?

AND SINCE ignorance of the law is no excuse for US PEOPLE, why the hell should it be an excuse for an OFFICER of the law, who SWEARS an oath to uphold the bloody law..

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by garhkal

How long as he been on the fucking job?

AND SINCE ignorance of the law is no excuse for US PEOPLE, why the hell should it be an excuse for an OFFICER of the law, who SWEARS an oath to uphold the bloody law..

like I said, this is the result of a breakdown in training and communication.

[Yssup Rider]

Shut the fuck up

[LexusLover]

133 S.Ct. 1552 (2013)


MISSOURI, Petitioner
v.
Tyler G. McNEELY.

No. 11-1425.


Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 17, 2013.

Justice SOTOMAYOR announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II-A, II-B, and IV, and an opinion with respect to Parts II-C and III, in which Justice SCALIA, Justice GINSBURG, and Justice KAGAN join.

In Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966), this Court upheld a warrantless blood test of an individual arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol because the officer "might reasonably have believed that he was confronted with an emergency, in which the delay necessary to obtain a warrant, under the circumstances, threatened the destruction of evidence." Id., at 770, 86 S.Ct. 1826 (internal quotation marks omitted). The question presented here is whether the natural metabolization of alcohol in the bloodstream presents a per se exigency that justifies an exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement for nonconsensual blood testing in all drunk-driving cases. We conclude that it does not, and we hold, consistent with general Fourth Amendment principles, that exigency in this context must be determined case by case based on the totality of the circumstances.

The Court unfortunately doesn't provide clear standards. Given the current makeup of the SCOTUS this decision might be otherwise if another opportunity arises.

Texas followed this case in the Court of Criminal Appeals.

[WTF]

LexusLover defending this Officers actions....big suprise.

So LL , you think the officer was justified?



.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

The Court unfortunately doesn't provide clear standards. Given the current makeup of the SCOTUS this decision might be otherwise if another opportunity arises.

Texas followed this case in the Court of Criminal Appeals.

What do you think LL? Do you think the officer was correct?

Everyone nut you so far has stated the officer overstepped his legal right.

What do you predict will happen via the court case?


.

[Yssup Rider]

LLIarMan has someone else's LexisNexis account number.

That's OK. The WHOLE FUCKING WORLD has his account number.

DESPICABLE.

[dilbert firestorm]

apparently the blood was already drawn out from the individual.

so, I think the blame falls on the nurse for failing to check his chart to see that the blood was already drawn.

the entire embarrassing confrontation could have been avoided.

[Sistine Chapel]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Rule Of Law! The nurse did good by Standing up for the Constitution...

FACT: If it was a black nurse your faggot ass wouldn't be saying that.