Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Jaxson66   Intelligence officials told Democrats and Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee that Russia is interfering in 2020 election and favors Donald Trump
 Top election security officials gave the bombshell warning at secret briefing held a week ago
 
 The aide - Shelby Pierson - was briefing the committee chaired by Adam Schiff, who led Donald Trump's impeachment
 
 Trump was furious and believed that only Schiff had been told about the warning and feared the Democrat would use the information against him
 He 'dressed down' Pierson's boss - then the acting director of national intelligence Joseph Maguire - in the Oval Office for allowing the briefing
 Maguire was replaced Wednesday by Trump ultra-loyalist Rick Grenell,  who incidentally will be the first ever openly gay cabinet secretary
 
 The fat lying bastard squatting in the Oval Office knows he needs Putin’s help to win after he got caught with his shakedown in Ukraine.
 | 
	
 
so where did you get this scathing info? the NY Times? VOX? where's the link!!! 
here's one for YOU .. doesn't say one word about anonymous reports about Trump'"s comments". butt yous might find it interesting nevertheless .. 
https://www.npr.org/2020/01/22/79818...r-more-diverse
Election Security Boss: Threats To 2020 Are Now Broader, More Diverse 
                          
                               
 
                                             Intelligence Community Threats Executive Shelby Pierson  told NPR that more nations may attempt more types of interference in the  United States. "This isn't a Russia-only problem," she says. Kisha Ravi/NPR 
    Threats to U.S. elections this year could be broader and more  diverse than before, warns the spy world's boss for election security —  and she also acknowledged the limits of her ability to tackle them.
   Shelby  Pierson, the intelligence community's election threats executive, told  NPR in an exclusive interview that more nations may attempt more types  of interference in the United States given the extensive lessons that  have since been drawn about the Russian attack on the 2016 presidential  election.
   
"This isn't a Russia-only problem," she told Noel King on Morning Edition.  "We're still also concerned about China, Iran, non-state actors,  'hacktivists.' And frankly ... even Americans might be looking to  undermine confidence in the elections."
Democratic Americans perhaps???? 
   But the U.S.  intelligence community isn't standing still, Pierson said. It, too, has  been working since 2016 to learn what lessons it can from that year and  also adapt in real time as others do to the way officials at every level  plan for this year's presidential race.
                                       I do think it is broader and more diverse simply because we  might have more actors than we had in 2016 and we might be looking at  different inroads.
 
   Shelby Pierson
    
         "I do think it is broader and more diverse simply because we might  have more actors than we had in 2016 and we might be looking at  different inroads — not just necessarily capitalizing on social media,  but also interfering in networks or the vote count," she said. "So you  really have a broader waterfront than you might have had in 2016."
                                   
                                  
2020 Election: Secure Your Vote 
             NPR Poll: Majority Of Americans Believe Trump Encourages Election Interference
          
         Pierson said that the intelligence community is expanding its  technical capabilities and trying to develop more human sources to alert  it to interference efforts, but there are two major factors that  complicate both what it can achieve and the efficacy of foreign  interference.
   First is the tension over what spies should  reveal about what they know, how much and when. Second, the reality that  each person forms her or his own perceptions about democracy, whether  an election is "rigged" or whether a fact is reliable.
   
Critics  faulted the administration of President Barack Obama for keeping quiet  through much of 2016 about what it was uncovering about the campaign of  active measures that Russia waged that year, including via cyberattacks  and with online agitation.
OH NO! the demigod traitor Manchurian Candidate Obama did nothing! how can this be??? 
Pierson said the intelligence  community today is conscious about that lesson and appreciates the  possibility that it may need to work quicker to decide how and when to  reveal information about potential threats. But these decisions aren't  simple.
   Intelligence officials need to preserve sources and  methods and don't want to needlessly sow more mistrust in democracy, she  said.
   "Some of my colleagues have said, 'maybe we shouldn't  necessarily spook the herd and share all this information ... Maybe  people go, 'You know what, this is all rigged. That's so much  disinformation. I'm not going to vote.' That would be worst case  scenario. And frankly, doing the work of our adversaries for them."
   At  the same time, the intelligence community says it wants to do more to  work with officials at every level. The FBI, for example, 
recently expanded its policy for making notifications when it detects a cyberattack.
   Pierson  also told NPR that it may sometimes be valid to expose a foreign  interference operation in the interest of educating voters and, she  hopes, prompting Americans not to become cynical but just the opposite —  to lean forward and engage.
                                   
                                  
2020 Election: Secure Your Vote
          
         "I've really taken some some very important suggestions to heart  that transparency enables resilience and, potentially, sunlight is the  best disinfectant," she said.
   Continued Pierson: "The more that  we talk about the threat, potentially more we empower voters to  understand this as merely a reality of today's landscape. And that  despite all of those challenges, we're managing them or countering them.  And [people] should vote."
   
View from within ODNI
   Pierson was appointed  election threats executive under the Office of the Director of National  Intelligence in one of the final acts of then-DNI Dan Coats before 
he was hustled out of the Trump administration last year.
   That position has been empty since and the vacant DNI has come to 
symbolize the lingering antipathy between President Trump and the spy bureaucracy.
   Trump  not only has never appeared simpatico with much of the intelligence  world, he has reserved particular scorn for election security itself.  Trump goes back and forth as to what he accepts about the events of 2016  and also has adopted conspiracy theories about it, including one which  forms the basis of the ongoing 
impeachment saga in the Senate.
   
None  of the political backdrop in Washington affects Pierson and her work,  she told NPR. ODNI and the intelligence community have the funding they  need, the authorities they need from Congress — and Trump also plays  ball when asked, she said.
does this sound like someone colluding with Russia or someone who knows he won fair and square in 2016 and will again??  
   For example, intelligence and  foreign policy specialists asked Trump to warn Russian Foreign Minister  Sergey Lavrov against interfering in the 2020 election, Pierson said —  and he agreed. 
Lavrov, however, later denied it came up.
   The bottom line, as NPR's King asked Pierson, was this: "You don't feel yourself having to work around President Trump?"
   "Not at all," Pierson said.
   
National conversation
   There  are limits to what the intelligence community can do to address a  problem that ultimately manifests itself in the hearts of Americans.
   One  objective of active measures is simply to spread chaos and sow doubt,  and Pierson said she hoped the coming year would bring a focus on  confronting that by citizens, news organizations and beyond.
   "This is where it's not only a whole of government effort, but frankly a whole of society effort," Pierson said.
   "Not  only do we want to improve media literacy so that Americans know where  to find accurate information to inform their vote and how to spot  disinformation if it's coming through on their own media feeds ..."
   She  continued: "... I think combating that type of activity, again, is a  full spectrum of opportunities, which can include technical operations  sponsored by the intelligence community, working in close partnership  with tech firms and social media firms, and as well as coupled with  media literacy. I think that frankly creates our best chance at societal  resilience against these threats."