remember fellas .. "This is CNN!"
bahahahahaa
even they smell smoke in the Harris campaign  
Harris’ border visit and economy speech capture attention as warning signs emerge for campaign
https://www.yahoo.com/news/harris-bo...190038239.html
Kamala Harris’ 
visit to the border and 
speech  outlining her economic vision captured the attention of a sizable share  of Americans as September came to a close, according to new findings  from 
The Breakthrough,  a polling project that tracks how the public is following election  news. But some emerging trends in the data hint at warning signs for the  vice president’s campaign.
The share of Americans hearing  anything at all about Harris has dropped each week since her  presidential debate with former President 
Donald Trump  in early September, and during that same time, the tone Americans use  in describing what they’ve heard about her has grown more negative,  reaching the lowest point of her campaign in the latest results.
 Looking  at what people say they have heard, read or seen about Harris, “lie”  has emerged as a persistent top word that some Americans associate with  her. In the latest data, it was the fourth-most mentioned word after  “border,” “polls” and “campaign.” It ranked sixth in the previous week’s  data and second the week of the 
ABC News presidential debate,  after ranking no higher than 12th in earlier rounds of the survey and  no higher than 20th prior to the Democratic convention in August.
 

 Georgetown University, University of Michigan and s3mc.org
 The  survey, conducted September 27-30 by SSRS and Verasight for research  teams from CNN, Georgetown University and the University of Michigan,  measures what Americans say they have recently heard, read or seen about  Harris and Trump.
The share of Americans mentioning words such as  “lie” or “liar” when asked what they’ve heard about Harris remains  quite small — just 6% in the latest data, compared with 15% who  mentioned something related to immigration, for example — but it has  grown over time, rising from 3% or less prior to the Democratic  convention to peak at 9% shortly after the debate.
“Kamala says  nothing,” wrote one respondent included in the latest survey. “She uses a  bunch of words that make no sense. She says she will close the border,  but that is a lie to get elected. Everything she promises are lies.”
The  broader focus on immigration (mentioned by 15% in relation to Harris)  and the economy (mentioned by 13%) in the latest data marks a notable  shift in responses about Harris, following her campaign’s efforts to  focus attention on the two topics with a visit to the southern border in  Arizona and an economic policy speech in Pittsburgh. It marks the first  time in the survey that multiple policy-related topics have landed in  the top five for Harris, and the most recent data saw by far the most  mentions for immigration-related words in relation to her campaign since  she entered the race in late July.
“I have watched her speeches  and appreciated her articulate explanation of her policies and positions  on various things,” another respondent wrote. “Her concern for all and  ability to concretely point to solutions to problems is a sharp contrast  to Donald Trump.”
On Trump’s side, the 
assassination attempts against him remain prominent in the public’s attention, while immigration has faded a bit and 
his meeting last month with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky garnered attention.
“He met with Zelensky and was not very enthusiastic about helping Ukraine,” one respondent wrote.
 Responses  calling the former president a liar are also persistently near the top  of his list. About 8% in the latest data use the word “lie” or “liar” in  relation to Trump. That figure has frequently been in the high single  digits as a share of topics about Trump since the start of the survey in  June, dipping below that at times, including around the first  assassination attempt against the former president and the Republican  National Convention.
 

 Georgetown University, University of Michigan and s3mc.org
 Although  responses about Harris are generally still less negative in tone than  those about Trump, there has been a notable decline in overall sentiment  in the Harris responses, while Trump’s numbers have rebounded slightly  following a post-debate drop. For Harris, the negative shift is apparent  across parties, with sentiments expressed by Democrats, Republicans and  independents all tilting slightly more negative in the new data than in  the week prior. For Trump, though, sentiment has held steady among  Republicans, while shifting slightly less negative than the previous  survey among independents and Democrats.
The latest poll found  that just under two-thirds of Americans (64%) reported seeing, reading  or hearing something about Harris, compared with 68% who said the same  about Trump. It marks the fourth straight week in which more people  reported hearing about Trump than they did about Harris, and it’s a  notable drop from the previous week in the shares saying they’d heard  about each candidate (Trump down 7 points, Harris down 5).
The  overall level of attention to the presidential candidates now is lower  than it was at this point in previous cycles, though that may be a side  effect of debate timing. In 2020, for example, more than 8 in 10  Americans reported having heard news about Trump and Joe Biden in the  same week of that campaign, but there was a presidential debate held on  September 29. In 2016, there was a mid-September dip in attention ahead  of that year’s first debate between Trump and Hillary Clinton, held on  September 26.
“It has been relatively quiet this week,” one  respondent to the latest survey wrote when asked about Trump. “I haven’t  heard of anything.”
CNN’s Ariel Edwards-Levy contributed to this report.
For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at 
CNN.com