Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
| cockalatte |
650 |
| MoneyManMatt |
490 |
| Jon Bon |
408 |
| Still Looking |
399 |
| samcruz |
399 |
| Harley Diablo |
377 |
| honest_abe |
362 |
| George Spelvin |
336 |
| Starscream66 |
313 |
| DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
| Chung Tran |
288 |
| lupegarland |
287 |
| nicemusic |
285 |
| You&Me |
281 |
| sharkman29 |
270 |
|
Top Posters |
| DallasRain | 71581 | | biomed1 | 70756 | | Yssup Rider | 63857 | | gman44 | 55898 | | LexusLover | 51038 | | offshoredrilling | 50395 | | WTF | 48272 | | bambino | 46896 | | pyramider | 46457 | | The_Waco_Kid | 41812 | | Dr-epg | 38517 | | CryptKicker | 37451 | | Mokoa | 36517 | | Chung Tran | 36100 | | Still Looking | 35944 |
|
|
01-15-2026, 05:56 AM
|
#106
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 46,896
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
Calling the Clintons to testify is nothing more than an attempt at a political hatchet job.
There are plenty of other people who have information to provide. But the Clintons are the ones subpoenaed before Congress and before all the files are released.
This is nothing more than a distraction to keep Trump out of the story.
|
You know that US Attorney @JudgeJeanine @USAttyPirro does not need a piece of paper from you to charge this crime, correct?
This is just about the most PUBLIC kind of federal crime it's possible to commit.
It's not like Pirro has to wait for a referral from you to act on this.
There is no referral needed. There is no investigation that needs to be done. These were all public events.
Now that the Clinton's refused to comply, they have committed a federal crime.
Pirro can charge them at any time now.
BTW, Garland arrested and threw Bannon and Nevaro in jail for the same thing. As the Libtards say, “ nobody is above the law.”
BAHAHAHA
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
01-15-2026, 09:16 AM
|
#107
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 63,857
|
If the files have been released as you say, where TF are they?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-15-2026, 10:22 AM
|
#108
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Sep 2, 2022
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 6,705
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
Calling the Clintons to testify is nothing more than an attempt at a political hatchet job.
There are plenty of other people who have information to provide. But the Clintons are the ones subpoenaed before Congress and before all the files are released.
This is nothing more than a distraction to keep trump out of the story.
|
Bingo. Luckily for donnie diaperload, his voters are the most easily distracted dipshits on planet earth.
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
01-15-2026, 11:24 AM
|
#109
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 4, 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,085
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayzee43
I never claimed to be to "orbiter" of anything.
But it's 100% true that trump campaigned on releasing the files.
It's also 100% true that he was no longer interested in releasing them after he was told that his name is on every fucking page of them.
It's also 100% true that he pulled a full 180 on releasing them and called anyone who wanted to see them released a "stupid weakling". So, he essentially called his own voters "stupid weaklings".
No matter how bad you want these things to not be true, they are. Go ahead and orbit around that, pal.

|
You keep living in this fantasy that the Epstein files are damning to Trump.
But you can’t acknowledge, if that were true, the files would have been released via Biden and Kamala.
Your take and conclusion are illogical. But at least you’re consistent, pal.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-15-2026, 11:27 AM
|
#110
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Sep 2, 2022
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 6,705
|
If the files weren't damning to trump, he would have released them by now. You know, like he campaigned on, and like the fucking law (that he signed) says he must.
Kamala and Biden have ZERO to do with anything here, as much as you want them to.
It's obvious trump's guilty. Only a brainwashed cultist would deny that.
And if he's innocent, all he has to do is release the files. Right? Can you at least acknowledge that?
I'm sure you won't acknowledge that simple fact, but there it is for you. Staring you right in the face.
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
01-15-2026, 01:20 PM
|
#111
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 21, 2011
Location: Bonerville
Posts: 7,057
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green_Mountain
You keep living in this fantasy that the Epstein files are damning to Trump.
But you can’t acknowledge, if that were true, the files would have been released via Biden and Kamala.
Your take and conclusion are illogical. But at least you’re consistent, pal.
|
What you seem to fail to acknowledge is this; most of the newer stuff didnt' come from DOJ, but rather the Epstein Estate. The full load of damning emails that weren't scrubbed. The 'cleaned up version came from DOJ. (doesn't matter which administration had them prior as they likely didn't want to re-wash the whole laundry due to Epstein being dead, and Maxwell being processed. They really can only look bad if people get a view of how sweet the deals were in general. As to the latest drop of a few million files 'recently found'.
The recent "new tranche" of Jeffrey Epstein documents released in early 2024 came from filings in a settled civil lawsuit brought by victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre against Epstein's associate, Ghislaine Maxwell. The documents were made public through a court order to unseal them, as they were part of the public court docket of that case. This new details were not available to prior admins legally so this is not the same old news, but rather New "old News".
Why is it so hard for conservatives to either use google or strap on a thinking cap? If some new video footage of the JFK shooting came up- wouldn't you google to find out about where it was from??
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-15-2026, 01:27 PM
|
#112
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 21, 2011
Location: Bonerville
Posts: 7,057
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino
You know that US Attorney @JudgeJeanine @USAttyPirro does not need a piece of paper from you to charge this crime, correct?
This is just about the most PUBLIC kind of federal crime it's possible to commit.
It's not like Pirro has to wait for a referral from you to act on this.
There is no referral needed. There is no investigation that needs to be done. These were all public events.
Now that the Clinton's refused to comply, they have committed a federal crime.
Pirro can charge them at any time now.
BTW, Garland arrested and threw Bannon and Nevaro in jail for the same thing. As the Libtards say, “ nobody is above the law.”
BAHAHAHA
|
They complied with providing an abundant amount of information via email about what they already knew. Acting like they didn't respond is disingenuous. The sent a lovely response to COMER about why they wouldn't as the subpoena's were lacking merit and were not about legislational controls and oversight also.
Here's the link to the Clintons reply- https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...ter-comer.html
Judge Jeannie Merlot can squawk all she likes- she's a worn out hag who knows that her audience of 1 is all that matters. BUT- legally- the appeal of that subpoena is gonna prevail and the only thing Comer and company will be holding is their dicks. Small stubbly limp conservative dicks.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-19-2026, 09:22 AM
|
#113
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Sep 2, 2022
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 6,705
|
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/0...delay-00735612
One month removed from the deadline to release the Epstein files, Thomas Massie remains the only Republican with a spine. He may be the only actual REAL Republican left. This MAGA shit is just a bunch of RINOs protecting their favorite [redacted].
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-20-2026, 03:31 AM
|
#114
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 5,776
|
Trump is right down the street. Why don’t they just get him to testify first and get it out of the way?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-20-2026, 09:22 AM
|
#115
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 63,857
|
He’s too busy terrorizing our allies to testify.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-20-2026, 10:55 AM
|
#116
|
|
The Man (He/Him/His)
Join Date: May 7, 2019
Location: The Box... Indeed
Posts: 11,299
|
That's to distract from the slow play of the files
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-20-2026, 11:05 AM
|
#117
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Sep 2, 2022
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 6,705
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDGristle
That's to distract from the slow play of the files
|
Absolutely. Look at everything that's happened just since Dec 19, 2025 (the Epstein files due date).
Venezuela, Minnesota, Greenland, the Nobel Prize embarrassment, threatening Denmark, trying to depose the Clintons for no reason...
It's Distraction 101, and he knows his voters are the most easily distracted dipshits on earth. And so, it continues to work for him.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
Today, 07:48 AM
|
#118
|
|
The Man (He/Him/His)
Join Date: May 7, 2019
Location: The Box... Indeed
Posts: 11,299
|
We'll know all the details about Trump's discombobulator weapon before we get these Epstein files released.
|
|
Quote
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|