Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
| cockalatte |
650 |
| MoneyManMatt |
490 |
| Jon Bon |
408 |
| Still Looking |
399 |
| samcruz |
399 |
| Harley Diablo |
377 |
| honest_abe |
362 |
| George Spelvin |
339 |
| Starscream66 |
314 |
| DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
| Chung Tran |
288 |
| lupegarland |
287 |
| nicemusic |
285 |
| You&Me |
281 |
| sharkman29 |
270 |
|
Top Posters |
| DallasRain | 71605 | | biomed1 | 71113 | | Yssup Rider | 64049 | | gman44 | 56016 | | LexusLover | 51038 | | offshoredrilling | 50515 | | WTF | 48272 | | bambino | 47475 | | pyramider | 46457 | | The_Waco_Kid | 41998 | | Dr-epg | 39145 | | CryptKicker | 37454 | | Mokoa | 36517 | | Chung Tran | 36100 | | Still Looking | 35944 |
|
|
01-19-2026, 05:56 PM
|
#1
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Dec 12, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,243
|
Protester storm Church
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
01-19-2026, 06:11 PM
|
#2
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 20,067
|
Oh wait! I thought Tampon Tim said he was worried about ICE agents invading Minnesota's Churches?
Is that where his unhinged "peaceful" mobs got the idea?
Let's go defile a House of Worship! That ought to give us some great optics!
Who wants to defend this one? Speak up, please!
|
|
Quote
 | 3 users liked this post
|
01-19-2026, 06:33 PM
|
#3
|
|
BANNED
Join Date: Sep 22, 2025
Location: USA
Posts: 458
|
That's not the way this works.
Before we defend it, you first have to tell us that "all Libs support this" and that "the Dems are the party of evil."
Then we defend it.
Oh, BTW...I won't defend this one bit.
It was a house of worship. Religious services should always be respected.
From the account that I read, there might be laws regarding interrupting worship services. If so, I am in full support of these people being charged criminally.
If it cannot be charged criminally, then I would support a civil action against these people for violating the Constitutional rights of the worshippers in attendance.
Sorry to disappoint you.
(any other libtards want to chime in here to wreck MAGA's pre-conceived impliciations?)
.
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
01-19-2026, 06:35 PM
|
#4
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 7, 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 3,769
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mort Watt
That's not the way this works.
Before we defend it, you first have to tell us that "all Libs support this" and that "the Dems are the party of evil."
Then we defend it.
Oh, BTW...I won't defend this one bit.
It was a house of worship. Religious services should always be respected.
From the account that I read, there might be laws regarding interrupting worship services. If so, I am in full support of these people being charged criminally.
If it cannot be charged criminally, then I would support a civil action against these people for violating the Constitutional rights of the worshippers in attendance.
Sorry to disappoint you.
(any other libtards want to chime in here to wreck MAGA's pre-conceived impliciations?)
.
|
I agree.
elg….
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-19-2026, 07:07 PM
|
#6
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 64,049
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mort Watt
That's not the way this works.
Before we defend it, you first have to tell us that "all Libs support this" and that "the Dems are the party of evil."
Then we defend it.
Oh, BTW...I won't defend this one bit.
It was a house of worship. Religious services should always be respected.
From the account that I read, there might be laws regarding interrupting worship services. If so, I am in full support of these people being charged criminally.
If it cannot be charged criminally, then I would support a civil action against these people for violating the Constitutional rights of the worshippers in attendance.
Sorry to disappoint you.
(any other libtards want to chime in here to wreck MAGA's pre-conceived impliciations?)
.
|
Agree!
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-19-2026, 07:24 PM
|
#7
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Nov 19, 2012
Location: Denver
Posts: 207
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mort Watt
That's not the way this works.
Before we defend it, you first have to tell us that "all Libs support this" and that "the Dems are the party of evil."
Then we defend it.
Oh, BTW...I won't defend this one bit.
It was a house of worship. Religious services should always be respected.
From the account that I read, there might be laws regarding interrupting worship services. If so, I am in full support of these people being charged criminally.
If it cannot be charged criminally, then I would support a civil action against these people for violating the Constitutional rights of the worshippers in attendance.
Sorry to disappoint you.
(any other libtards want to chime in here to wreck MAGA's pre-conceived impliciations?)
.
|
They should be respected by those conducting the services. Stand up there and tell people to follow Jesus’ example and work for ICE during the week? ICE is fucking evil, and the people of Minnesota are living that. Nothing wrong with them calling out the height of hypocrisy in the moment it’s being practiced.
Jesus wouldn’t stand for this bs clergy. Not even close!
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-19-2026, 07:42 PM
|
#8
|
|
BANNED
Join Date: Sep 22, 2025
Location: USA
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeahsurewhatev
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeahsurewhatev
They should be respected by those conducting the services. Stand up there and tell people to follow Jesus’ example and work for ICE during the week? ICE is fucking evil, and the people of Minnesota are living that. Nothing wrong with them calling out the height of hypocrisy in the moment it’s being practiced.
Jesus wouldn’t stand for this bs clergy. Not even close!
|
You may very well be right about WWJD. And I'm cool with that angle.
But I have a question: did the people who protested belong to this church? It is hard to tell. But I think any objections to this Pastor or anything said during Services needs to come from within the Congregation. If these protesters were from outside the church, then they violated the civil rights of that Congregation. And perhaps the law.
Now...if Jesus really had issue with what was going on in that Church, then I freely acknowledge that he may have done exactly what these protesters did.
But Jesus also understood that doing things like this would often come with consequences that had to be accepted. I direct your attention to a dark event that occurred about 2000 years ago at Golgatha....
My opinion is that you don't get to go into someone else's church to object to what they are saying. Again, those objections need to come from within the Congregation.
If you do disagree with that Congregation so much that you feel you MUST violate their Sanctuary...and that Jesus would do it too... well....I might respect you, if I know enough about your cause. But you're going to lose in Court, and you need to accept that.
Otherwise....what's to stop MAGA...or worse... from entering YOUR church and disrupting YOUR worship just because they don't like you helping immigrants? Or Atheists storming your church telling you that EVERYTHING you are saying is wrong?
ONE LAST POINT: I am a true Agnostic. But also a massive respecter of people who are faithful. Truly faithful.
But it is the absolute height of hubris to imply that you KNOW what Jesus would do.
Certainly you can pose that question to others....encourage them to think about it. But you are not justified to say that he would do any particular thing.
It is guidance. Not a mandate.
Use the question carefully. You ain't him. And he warned you many times that you were incapable of understanding him fully....
.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-19-2026, 08:21 PM
|
#9
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Apr 25, 2009
Location: sa tx usa
Posts: 16,886
|
Maybe this was a front for collecting $$$ for maggie stuff, making them right for doing such.
Disclaimer: JOKING!
We all know how the ultra narrow minded the maggie flock are when they hear what the percieve as the most slightest of slights against fearless leader and what he stands for in his non-secular country.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-19-2026, 08:52 PM
|
#10
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 5,958
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Precious_b
Maybe this was a front for collecting $$$ for maggie stuff, making them right for doing such.
Disclaimer: JOKING!
We all know how the ultra narrow minded the maggie flock are when they hear what the percieve as the most slightest of slights against fearless leader and what he stands for in his non-secular country.
|
From what I heard these protesters are actually paid agitators fronted by the Russians and FOX news in an effort to sow divisive discord and ramp up ratings for sweep weeks.
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
01-19-2026, 09:19 PM
|
#11
|
|
AKA ULTRA MAGA Trump Gurl
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 41,998
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
From what I heard these protesters are actually paid agitators fronted by the Russians and FOX news in an effort to sow divisive discord and ramp up ratings for sweep weeks.
|
if you say so
oh look! Don "Lemon Juicer" Lemon better find a sanctuary women's restroom to hide out in!
DOJ to Investigate and Arrest Don Lemon and Minneapolis Church Stormers
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/joseph...rmers-n2669725
The Department of Justice has announced that they will be arresting Don Lemon and open investigations into the storming of Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota.
Lemon will reportedly be arrested by the Trump administration under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act and the Ku Klux Klan Act.
“The Klan Act is one of the most important federal civil rights statutes,” said Civil Rights Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon on The Benny Johnson Show. It's a law that makes it illegal to terrorize and violate the civil rights of citizens. Whenever people conspire this, the Klan Act can be used.”
https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/20...rmers-n2669725
BREAKING: DOJ Announces Intention to Charge Don Lemon under the Ku Klux Klan Act.
The KKK Act makes it illegal to threaten, hurt, or intimidate people to prevent them from exercising their God-given rights.
HARMEET DHILLON: "The Klan Act is one of the most important federal civil rights statutes. Its a law that makes it illegal to terrorize and violate the civil rights of citizens.
Whenever people conspire this, the Klan Act can be used." "Everyone in the protest community needs to know that the fullest force of the federal government is going to come down and prevent this from happening and put people away for a long time."
“Don Lemon himself has come out and said he knew exactly what was going to happen in that facility,” Dhillon continued. “He went into the facility, and then he began, quote-unquote, committing journalism, as if that is some sort of shield from being a part—an embedded part of a criminal conspiracy.”
Dhillon then confirmed that her office would begin launching investigations into those who took part in the storming of Cities Church after learning the pastor served as a local ICE official, and issued a warning for any would-be copycats.
“Come next Sunday, nobody in the United States should think that they’re going to be able to get away with this,” Dhillon finished. “Everyone in the protest community needs to know that the fullest force of the federal government is going to come down and prevent this from happening, and put people away for a long long time.”
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche didn’t pull any punches from the lack of response from Democrat leaders in the state, saying: “people [are] going to worship, and they are stormed by anti-law enforcement, anti-Christian rioters. Today, [Gov. Tim Walz] just throws his hands up and says ‘oh, I’ve always said you should peacefully protest. That is just completely made up.
Don "Lemon Juicer" Lemon is a fugitive from justice!
BAHHAHAAAAA
|
|
Quote
 | 3 users liked this post
|
01-19-2026, 09:21 PM
|
#12
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Nov 19, 2012
Location: Denver
Posts: 207
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mort Watt
You may very well be right about WWJD. And I'm cool with that angle.
But I have a question: did the people who protested belong to this church? It is hard to tell. But I think any objections to this Pastor or anything said during Services needs to come from within the Congregation. If these protesters were from outside the church, then they violated the civil rights of that Congregation. And perhaps the law.
Now...if Jesus really had issue with what was going on in that Church, then I freely acknowledge that he may have done exactly what these protesters did.
But Jesus also understood that doing things like this would often come with consequences that had to be accepted. I direct your attention to a dark event that occurred about 2000 years ago at Golgatha....
My opinion is that you don't get to go into someone else's church to object to what they are saying. Again, those objections need to come from within the Congregation.
If you do disagree with that Congregation so much that you feel you MUST violate their Sanctuary...and that Jesus would do it too... well....I might respect you, if I know enough about your cause. But you're going to lose in Court, and you need to accept that.
Otherwise....what's to stop MAGA...or worse... from entering YOUR church and disrupting YOUR worship just because they don't like you helping immigrants? Or Atheists storming your church telling you that EVERYTHING you are saying is wrong?
ONE LAST POINT: I am a true Agnostic. But also a massive respecter of people who are faithful. Truly faithful.
But it is the absolute height of hubris to imply that you KNOW what Jesus would do.
Certainly you can pose that question to others....encourage them to think about it. But you are not justified to say that he would do any particular thing.
It is guidance. Not a mandate.
Use the question carefully. You ain't him. And he warned you many times that you were incapable of understanding him fully....
.
|
Vonnegut has a character who’s an anarchist who makes his fortune in government bonds. It’s like you’re trying to go one better as the holier-than-thou agnostic. I am just as amused.
Since a lawyer led the protest, my guess is she understands the consequences of civil disobedience. Are you trying to tell me these brave people who are facing down ICE every day are as chicken shit as those same ICE goons who literally hide their faces to get away with murder? Pay attention. For one, they are plainly visible in their own videos. More than that, these people are putting it all on the line for their neighbors and their community every day, so they know more than you or I do about consequences. Might want to descend from the heights of abstract theory and think about this actual on the ground invasion they’re living through.
I can’t find anywhere what the members of this church think about the protest. Makes me wonder if it doesn’t fit the narrative of the great harm that was done to them. (Yeah, the minister who was leading the service was bothered, but it seemed he knew about the ICE official and was okay with it. He’s complicit.) Funny how Harmeet Dhillon all of the sudden recalls, “The Klan Act is a law that makes it illegal to terrorise citizens, to violate their civil rights, to get together and conspire to violate their civil rights.” Is this what you point to in your mention of the church members’ civil rights? Holy Fucking Hell!!! This is the ICE playbook to a T. Of course they all of the sudden remember it to wield against those combatting them. This works for you?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-20-2026, 03:28 AM
|
#13
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 8, 2013
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 10,691
|
+1 from another avowed libtard..
well said sir!
hypocrisy is best pointed out in an op ed. yes, you can knock over tables, but just be aware that there may be civil or criminal penalties. in Christ's case, i just don't think he actually gave a fuck. he had a point to make, and made it, to hell with the consequences.
these protesters would've won more hearts and minds just by putting hypocrisy on blast. no chance Jesus' day job would be at ICE in a mask terrorizing "the blind and the lame" aka those without papers..
he celebrated the prostitutes, the tax collectors, the working men-fishermen-the poor, and the unchosen race-the Gentiles. he was a man of the people. today we'd call him a true populist, in contrast to the fake populist presently occupying the Oval Office..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mort Watt
That's not the way this works.
Before we defend it, you first have to tell us that "all Libs support this" and that "the Dems are the party of evil."
Then we defend it.
Oh, BTW...I won't defend this one bit.
It was a house of worship. Religious services should always be respected.
From the account that I read, there might be laws regarding interrupting worship services. If so, I am in full support of these people being charged criminally.
If it cannot be charged criminally, then I would support a civil action against these people for violating the Constitutional rights of the worshippers in attendance.
Sorry to disappoint you.
(any other libtards want to chime in here to wreck MAGA's pre-conceived impliciations?)
.
|
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-20-2026, 06:17 AM
|
#14
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 5, 2010
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 7,143
|
Interesting to note that in a Sanctuary City there is no sanctuary in a church.
Disregarding the legal implications of tis action for a moment . . . . this is not a good look for the liberal progressive left.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
01-20-2026, 07:04 AM
|
#15
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 31, 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 2,157
|
Trump weighs in...
"A small group of elderly ladies were protesting at an abortion clinic and were given 40 years in prison for violating the FACE Act."
"I would like to see the same kind of sentence for Don Lemon and the people that broke into that church and did that during services."
The Incident: In October 2020, a group of pro-life activists, including several elderly individuals, blockaded a reproductive health clinic in Washington, D.C..
Convictions: The activists were convicted of violating the FACE Act and conspiracy against rights.
Sentences: While the activists did receive federal prison time, the sentences were far shorter than 40 years.
Lauren Handy, the leader, received the longest sentence: 57 months (4 years and 9 months).
Paulette Harlow (75 years old) was sentenced to 24 months (2 years).
Jean Marshall (74 years old) was sentenced to 24 months.
Joan Bell (76 years old) was sentenced to 27 months.
Actual Sentences: Most of the 10 defendants received prison sentences ranging from 10 to 27 months.
Pardons: Donald Trump pardoned the activists involved in this 2020 clinic blockade after taking office for his second term in January 2025.
Civil Rights Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon
Quote:
|
It's a law that makes it illegal to terrorize and violate the civil rights of citizens.
|
At least 170 U.S. Citizens Have Been Held by Immigration Agents.
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|