Supreme Court discussion sports boys and girls

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by ICU 812

Lets all keep the discussion on the pros and cons of the topic, not wander off into other things.

My position is that males are males and females are females. . . .and this distinction is determined by one's genetic makeup.

And yes, as someone has pointed out above, there ae a few, Avery few, individuals born with genetic anomalies that may be manifested in their overt phenotype. . . . .but not in the numbers seen today as identifying as trans-whatever, most of whom if not all, actually have the genetics and body of a "normal" person.

Thank you for recognizing the latter.

And it fits well within the slot of this discussion since people here want to see things in black and white.

A person with such "anomalies" does has the right to participate. Just waiting for the maggies to tell us which door they open for them

[ICU 812]

Originally Posted by Precious_b

Thank you for recognizing the latter.

And it fits well within the slot of this discussion since people here want to see things in black and white.

A person with such "anomalies" does has the right to participate. Just waiting for the maggies to tell us which door they open for them

And I think not.

Further more: Keeping the playing field level is what the Title-9 legislation is all about. The protections it provides for women was hard fought and it took decades. That the progressive left is now trying to nullify all that is reprehensble.

Additionally, there is no way that the number of people with genuinely abnormal genetics in anywhere near what we are told to believe today. The cases in contention in transgender sports, dressing rooms etc do not establish such genetic abnormalities as a basis for allowing any specific individual to compete with "normal" females . . .not that I am aware of.

My understanding is that the transgender cases revolve around the diagnosis of gender dysphoria. That has nothing to do with abnormal genetics . . .its a mental disorder.