EVERY 213 Democrat who voted against this needs to be kicked out of Congress

[RX792P]

Interesting you should mention the federal gov and elections..
Seems the Department of Homeland Security tool called the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE, has some 'problems'

https://www.texastribune.org/2026/02...kes-confusion/

When county clerk Brianna Lennon got an email in November saying a newly expanded federal system had flagged 74 people on the county’s voter roll as potential noncitizens, she was taken aback.

Lennon, who’d run elections in Boone County, Missouri, for seven years, had heard the tool might not be accurate.

The flagged voters’ registration paperwork confirmed Lennon’s suspicions. The form for the second person on the list bore the initials of a member of her staff, who’d helped the man register — at his naturalization ceremony. It later turned out more than half the Boone County voters identified as noncitizens were actually citizens.
The source of the bad data was a Department of Homeland Security tool called the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE.

In Missouri, state officials acted on SAVE’s findings before attempting to confirm them, directing county election administrators to make voters flagged as potential noncitizens temporarily unable to vote. But in hundreds of cases, the tool’s determinations were wrong, our review found.

In Texas
Our reporting showed these errors were more widespread than previously known, involving at least 87 voters across 29 counties.

EVEN WITH SAVE ERRORS
Even counting people flagged in error, the first bulk searches using SAVE haven’t validated the president’s claims that voting by noncitizens is widespread. At least seven states with a total of about 35 million registered voters have publicly reported the results of running their voter rolls through the system. Those searches have identified roughly 4,200 people — about 0.01% of registered voters — as noncitizens.

Sofia Minotti, who lives north of Dallas in Denton County, was born in Argentina but became a U.S. citizen years ago. Nonetheless, she was one of 84 Denton County voters identified by SAVE as a potential noncitizen. She and 11 others have since provided proof of citizenship, giving the system an error rate in the county of at least 14%.

[RX792P]

Meanwhile, early voting for TX primaries starts Feb 17-Feb 27
https://www.texastribune.org/2026/02...les-primaries/

You’ll need one of seven types of valid photo ID to vote in Texas:

A state driver’s license, issued by the Texas Department of Public Safety.
A Texas election identification certificate, issued by DPS.
A Texas personal identification card issued by DPS.
A Texas license to carry a handgun issued by DPS.
A U.S. military ID card with a personal photo.
A U.S. citizenship certificate with a personal photo.
A U.S. passport.

[RX792P]

I would remind of certain words from July 27, 2024


"in four years, you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good, you're not gonna have to vote."


And today

I would say that many people believe that [elections] may be one of the most important things — that we need to make sure we trust, is reliable, and that when it gets to Election Day, that we’ve been proactive to make sure we have the right people voting, electing the right leaders to lead this country through the days that we have. [And] knowing that people can trust it.

[TechPapi]

We should probably start with the vote cheaters in congress, eh?


No your eyes aren't fooling you. this is a 2ND video of Randy Fine unlawfully casting votes in Florida.

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by ICU 812

The way I understand the process I California: In primary elections, each party may put candidate son the primary ballot. However, only the top two got getters will appear on the ballot for the general election. This means that

An example: The election is for Dogcatcher of Sumpwater County. Democrats run three candidates. (#1, #2 1nd #3). Republicans run three candidates (#4, #5 and #6).

When the votes are counted, #1 and #3 have the top total;s in the Sumpwater County eprimary election. In the general election for Dog Catcher, only #1 and #3 even paper on the ballot. In effect, the Republican Party in that county cannot choose who they will run for Dog Catcher against a Democrat candidate.

In California, the so called "Primary Election" is in reality just a preliminary run-off for the general election. In many counties, Republican voters never have the opportunity to vote for a Republican candidate in the general election.

Than why have the voters not filed a law suit about it? Well, maybe they have. And if not currently in court, the result must have been settled to where the current system is not challenged.

As I stated:
"

Originally Posted by Precious_b

...And as long of each parties constituents legal wishes are honoured, what do i care?...

"

Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

It is hilarious the dozens and dozens of times maggies filed cases about what they screamed in the streets, and still do while having tears in their eyes, ...fraud but were too chickenshit to peep one syllable of fraud in legal filings.

A BIG FAT ZERO wins in court because they were too scared to bring proof of fraud. That's on y'all maggies.