Trump personal feuds - Republicans okay with that ?

[Yssup Rider]

This guys shows the world his red baboon ass all day every day.

His statesmanship is an insult to ships on the whole.

Yet here we are, discussing if his being a raving asshole is acceptable behavior for a President of the United States.

Like it is in any instance.

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

Research is fine I've done my share of it but seeking the truth goes beyond that. Oh God isn't just a point of view. If more people had a better understanding of God I doubt, there would be wars all over the dam place and a President so out of his mind that every move he makes triggers Democrats to lose their friggin minds.

Which God is that? Ares? Mars? Odin? Huitzilopochtli? Kartikeya? Sekhmet? Morrigan? Indra? Nergal?

Play fast-n-loose when you throw religion in there. The "fine" is a much more qualitative parameter to use. A President so out of his mind that every move he makes triggers Republicans to lose their friggin minds.

Originally Posted by Levianon17

No, I don't particularly support it, but it doesn't trigger me into a rage either. I voted for Trump twice, if he could run for a third term, I wouldn't vote for him a third time, but I wouldn't vote for a Democrat either.

This is his third term. All the sheeple say so along with him. The maggies have been triggered into rage and violent actions for years about the second term.

Originally Posted by 00 gauge

In response to OP's original questions, how many personal feuds does Trump have? Haven't counted them, and don't care ..... and is this appropriate presidential behavior? Maybe not, but if it keeps those who have TDS here to keep losing their minds, it's definitely worth it ..... Trump knows exactly which buttons to push to piss off those who can't stand him, and it's an absolute joy to see the reactions of those who can't tolerate anything he says or does ..... Trump will never change the way he is, nor should he .....

Oh. Maggies want a jerry springer-esque administration instead of one that truly carries out the wishes that the voters cast a ballot for. Seems that the maggies truly do want to cast a democracy aside. Thank you for being one of the first to come out and tell us that. Don't be afraid to say that January 6 was about it too.

Originally Posted by Turner2099

He's The President, though, and should hold a higher level of decorum. As President he represents our country on the global stage and the world is clearly watching.

As far as the lawsuits go, I challenge you to find a politician who has been involved in as many as Trump. Don't count the cases of former attorneys.

Yeah, his displays of statesmanship really do show what a stable genius he is.

Originally Posted by Turner2099

As third party voters must be realizing now, you need to choose the lesser of two evils; otherwise your vote may end up weighing in where you don't want it.

When given a choice between two evils, I always choose the one that is the most fun. 2016 election didn't give that offer. In hindsight, definitely know which way I would want things to be.

Originally Posted by Levianon17

That might be true. My point is you don't have control over what Trump does or anyone else for that matter.

Than what are elections for?

[Turner2099]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

[/COLOR]
Yeah, that's what voting is, lesser of two evils. It's more than a cliche it's the actual case. Essentially when you vote you are voting for an evil candidate that isn't going to work for you but against you. Your interpretation of which is the lesser evil is based on your outlook but you're still getting an evil.

I was actually being quite literal when I wrote the choosing the lesser of two evils in reference to third party voting. In reality, we are a two party system, so by casting a third party vote you are basically throwing away your vote and are voting against your own interests, regardless, if you consider them both bad. My opinion, anyway.

Even the Pope weighed into US politics during the 2024 Presidential election and I don't recall that happening in my lifetime. In reference to voting for Harris or Trump, he said to choose the lesser evil. This freed Catholics from being forced to vote for the candidate who opposed abortion, which has historically been a huge sticking point.

To me, this was a clear indication of support for Harris.

The new Pope even stated in reference to the US that the inhumane treatment of immigrants is inconsistent with being truly pro-life.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by Precious_b

Which God is that? Ares? Mars? Odin? Huitzilopochtli? Kartikeya? Sekhmet? Morrigan? Indra? Nergal?

Play fast-n-loose when you throw religion in there. The "fine" is a much more qualitative parameter to use. A President so out of his mind that every move he makes triggers Republicans to lose their friggin minds.



This is his third term. All the sheeple say so along with him. The maggies have been triggered into rage and violent actions for years about the second term.



Oh. Maggies want a jerry springer-esque administration instead of one that truly carries out the wishes that the voters cast a ballot for. Seems that the maggies truly do want to cast a democracy aside. Thank you for being one of the first to come out and tell us that. Don't be afraid to say that January 6 was about it too.



Yeah, his displays of statesmanship really do show what a stable genius he is.



When given a choice between two evils, I always choose the one that is the most fun. 2016 election didn't give that offer. In hindsight, definitely know which way I would want things to be.



Than what are elections for?

Elections are for one purpose to get voters to think they are doing something beneficial. The reality though the powers that be are going to put the candidate of their choice in office. Trump even said it, the elections are rigged and they are.

[Turner2099]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

Elections are for one purpose to get voters to think they are doing something beneficial. The reality though the powers that be are going to put the candidate of their choice in office. Trump even said it, the elections are rigged and they are.

If the elections were really rigged as he says, he wouldn't be President.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by Turner2099

If the elections were really rigged as he says, he wouldn't be President.

Sure, he would and that's why he is president. If elections were legit, then he wouldn't have even been nominated. The only information that you really have received about Trump came from the Media. For the most part the Media has prompted you to dislike Trump by the information they have put out and the manner in which they have delivered it. Regardless how anyone feels about a candidate those that are truly in power will install the candidate they desire most voting is just a formality for the ignorant masses.