The Real Reason Why Poor People Are Fat
 Professor and obesity researcher, Dr. Adam Drewnowski set  out to  determine why income is the most reliable predictor of obesity in the   U.S. To do this, he took a hypothetical dollar to the grocery store. His  goal  was to purchase as many calories as possible per dollar.
 What he found is that he could buy well over 1,000 calories  of  cookies or potato chips. But his dollar would only buy 250 calories of   carrots. He could buy almost 900 calories of soda… but only 170 calories  of  orange juice.
 If you are poor and hungry, you are obviously going to buy  the  cheapest calories you can find. And in today’s world, the cheapest  calories  come from junk foods – whether those foods are found at the  grocery store, the  gas station, or in the fast food restaurant,  conveniently located just down the  street.
 But this raises another question. How can  industrially-processed  foods and their associated marketing costs be so much  cheaper than  real, whole foods produced from water, seeds and sunlight?
 In a New York Times article, author Michael Pollan asks this  very question…
 “Compared with a bunch of  carrots, a package of Twinkies is a  highly complicated, high-tech piece of  manufacture, involving no fewer  than 39 ingredients, many themselves  elaborately manufactured, as well  as the packaging and a hefty marketing  budget. So how can the  supermarket possibly sell a pair of these synthetic cream-filled   pseudo-cakes for less than a bunch of roots?
 
Pollan goes on to answer his own question…
 “The Twinkie is basically a  clever arrangement of carbohydrates  and fats teased out of corn, soybeans and  wheat — three of the five  commodity crops that the farm bill supports, to the  tune of some $25  billion a year.”
 
The primary reason that lower-income people are more  overweight is  because the unhealthiest and most fattening foods are the  cheapest. If  you were broke and had just three dollars to spend on food today,  would  you buy a head of broccoli or a Super Value Meal with French fries, a   cheeseburger and a Coke?
 Because you’re reading this publication, you might choose  the  former. But for most people who have very little to spend on food, the   choice is clear.
 And make no mistake. This does not represent a failure of  the  capitalist free-market system. Modern agri-business and government food   policy represents a perverted version of capitalism – crony capitalism –  where  those with the most money and the most powerful friends in  government control  the markets.
 What they have done is use your tax dollars to subsidize  certain  commodity crops (at the expense of others) to ensure that the cost of   oils, sugar and grains stay artificially low. With low input costs, food   manufacturers can turn a tidy profit. The end result is that processed  foods –  even though they require more technology, more labor and more  marketing to  produce and sell – are cheaper to the consumer than real,  whole foods.
 Consider that between 1985 and 2000, the inflation-adjusted  prices  of fruits and vegetables increased by an average of 40%. During the same   period of time the real price of soft drinks fell by almost 25%.
 There is no doubt that obesity has become a public health  crisis.  But because most politicians either do not understand the issue or   because they are too corrupt to do the right thing, most “solutions” to  this crisis  are completely wrongheaded.
 Some politicians are calling for a tax on fat people  themselves.  Currently, many state governments have imposed taxes on soft drinks  and  junk foods. And calls are growing louder for similar taxes at the  federal  level.  
 It is completely insane that in a country where the surgeon  general  has identified “an epidemic of obesity” that we are simultaneously  subsidizing  the production of high-fructose corn syrup. It is equally  insane that the  government is helping to artificially lower the cost of  foods that are driving  up national healthcare costs (i.e. killing us),  while having a national healthcare  debate about how we are going to  pay for those costs.
To read more click here