***Breaking News*** - Federal Appellate Court Shoots Down Trumps Travel Ban

[R.M.]

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Chateau Becot

^^^^^^^^^^See, kids? This is why mom and dad need to make sure junior doesn't tamper with PARENTAL CONTROLS.

... and there has been resistance to allowing mental patients being treated by "computer therapy"!

Like Luke Warm, Munchie, and SissyLips, he's confirmed he is a worthless POS and posts nothing but trashy nonsense.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt

Go check the polls more Americans are against the ban than for the ban ?

How do you know they are all "Americans"?

I would imagine most are ...

Middle Easterners, Africans, Europeans, and Asians.

("Russians" just sneak in!!!)

The "Americans" don't need a "VISA" .. they swim, paddle, or walk!

Or they are already here!

[IIFFOFRDB]

Lewd_Wimpyass, up your's, again...

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...f/#more-128440

Ninth Circuit Court Now Demands It Be Protected From Itself…

Oh, the winning… it’s often too funny. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is now independently, on its own impetus, requesting an internal vote on a full panel en banc hearing to review its own decision.

Additionally, the full ninth are asking the Trump administration to file an additional brief telling the court why the three member original appeals ruling authority was wrong. In essence, the smart judges know what wasn’t considered, and are now looking for an out.

You just can’t make this stuff up.

Prior to expanding the conversation, allow us to set the current stage with a few tweet optics:




Wait, wha… huh? Yes, that’s the 9th circuit requesting its own judicial membership ruling to be reviewed by the entire larger 9th circuit appeals court panel. Ya think maybe they recognize they just jumped head-first into showcasing their own insufferable moonbattery…


14h
Chris Geidner ✔ @chrisgeidner
"in honor of the [Ninth Circuit] decision"
Follow

Chris Geidner ✔ @chrisgeidner
BREAKING: 9th Circuit will be voting on whether to reconsider the 3-judge panel decision en banc. pic.twitter.com/ruXjU6PFXj
5:05 PM - 10 Feb 2017
View image on Twitter
425 425 Retweets 205 205 likes

Meanwhile, President Trump is saying he has no intentions to challenge the crazy:



It’s a classic representative example of ‘be careful what you wish for, because you just might get it‘.

Currently, thanks to the ridiculous political judicial opinion of the 9th Circuit, the entire professional left and Democrat party are on display trying to block President Trump from protecting the American people. As a direct consequence they own any negative outcomes, including any act of terrorism, that might happen in the next several months.

Why would President Trump remove that political liability? If he’s smart, and he’s proven he is way beyond smart, he won’t.

Behind the scenes, and unrelated to the judicial ruling, President Trump can use his cabinet team to construct immigration and visa review policy that accomplishes the security goal. The Attorney General (Sessions), DHS (Kelly) and State Department (T-Rex) can execute departmental policy objectives under existing legal authority.

President Trump never really needed the majority parts of the executive order to carry out the security agenda. However, using the XO provided a highly public approach toward showing the American electorate he was fulfilling a campaign security promise. Tightening the visa approval process and executing “extreme vetting” doesn’t require anything except a policy and procedural change.

If President Trump does nothing, the underlying challenges to the Executive Order continue forward in the courts, while he gets his SCOTUS pick -Gorsuch- on the bench. If he so chooses, the DOJ can eventually bring the case to the Supreme Court, where almost everyone admits the Ninth Circuit and Judge Robarts decision will be overturned and all of the protestation from the left will have been for naught.

In the interim of the slow case proceeding, ANY instance of violence and terrorism provides President Trump the opportunity to use his bully pulpit -and Twitter- to hang the occurrence, foreign or domestic, like a millstone around the neck of Democrats up for elected office in 2018.

There is no downside on the domestic security agenda for President Trump; however, the Democrats are fraught with fear that something might just happen. Ultimately, THIS, the politics behind the entire construct, is the reason for the ninth circuit tonight asking for an en banc hearing of their own judicial ruling.

Smile, you’re worth it.



…”Complicated business folks…. complicated business”…

Oh boy, I just can’t wait for the Trump budget.

[LexusLover]

Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure › TITLE VII. GENERAL PROVISIONS
..
Rule 35. En Banc Determination

(a) When Hearing or Rehearing En Banc May Be Ordered. A majority of the circuit judges who are in regular active service and who are not disqualified may order that an appeal or other proceeding be heard or reheard by the court of appeals en banc. An en banc hearing or rehearing is not favored and ordinarily will not be ordered unless:

(1) en banc consideration is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the court's decisions; or

(2) the proceeding involves a question of exceptional importance.

[IIFFOFRDB]

this? http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/...dure-Guide.pdf

[LexusLover]

I think the point is, at least from my perspective, the 9th Circus has 29 clowns available for an en banc hearing and can have as few as 11 clowns to rehear the matter, but the bottom line is .... they're CLOWNS!

It's sort of like Luke Warm, SissyLips, and/or AssupWipe ... along with other sometimers.

.. do you actually believe that the collective bunch of them would make a better decision than any one of them?

Liberal Loons are Liberal Loons. More of them just makes more NOISE!

Let's look at the "process" ... and motivation ....

.. the 9th circus by initiating the "en banc" process has SLOWED DOWN the appellate/mandate timing .... at the moment the case is "pending" in the 9th Circus Appellate Court and the District Court Judge can "defer" to the COA as having "jurisdiction over the case" until the en banc decision is made and the days for the rehearing have passed.

If the U.S. Government wants to appeal, the appellate clock doesn't start running until the en banc decision is made and the days for the rehearing have passed.

By seeking "sua sponte" an en banc decision the 9th Circus is merely delaying the process while the TRO is still effective. Given the 9th Circus "propensity" for loony decisions that are frequently reversed by the SCOTUS they are delaying the inevitable.

IMO the CLOWNS are inadvertently assisting Trump to have a majority on the SCOTUS of FIVE!

"It's an ill wind that blows no good!"

The Senate Democrats just screwed themselves the same way ... delayed Session's vote leaving him in the Senate to vote with the other Republicans. One cannot forget that all these fools attempting to strategize the attempt to screw the Trump Administration and prevent it from being effective are the same bunch of loons who got behind CommieBernie and HillyNoMore and got the Democrats pasted in the General Elections. They spend ALL THEIR EFFORTS attempting to plaster Trump, who methodically went about his business of marshaling the votes to win the election ....

.... by making ALL THE RIGHT DECISIONS.

As we are posting ... Europeans are on the SAME PAGE WITH TRUMP on immigration, but they are 5-6 years ahead of the Liberals in this country .... and that IS A PROBLEM OF THE LIBERALS .... that's why they got their asses handed to them in the Fall. Remember Bush Jr. "tricking them" into voting for the invasion in 2003? And Gruber laughing at them!!!!!

Thanks to Harry Reid .... there should be an RNC sponsored party in his "honor"!