Another Benghazi thread

[royamcr]

SO.... old news... Time to move forward and investigate the traitors of Jan 6 and bookem and stuffem.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by royamcr

SO.... old news... Time to move forward and investigate the traitors of Jan 6 and bookem and stuffem.

You mean Pelosi and the FBI.

[royamcr]

Originally Posted by bambino

You mean Pelosi and the FBI.

Jesus h you are clueless.

[offshoredrilling]

Originally Posted by royamcr

Jesus h you are clueless.

you do know T offered troops and P and C-police turned it down for that Jan 6th thingy. Add in the FBI and it was almost like a set up

[bambino]

Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

you do know T offered troops and P and C-police turned it down for that Jan 6th thingy. Add in the FBI and it was almost like a set up

True.

[royamcr]

Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

you do know T offered troops and P and C-police turned it down for that Jan 6th thingy. Add in the FBI and it was almost like a set up

You have no evidence of that.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by royamcr

You have no evidence of that.

https://djhjmedia.com/rich/trump-off...ed-every-time/

[royamcr]

Lets see him testify to this under oath when he is called in front of the committee....

Trump said he requested "10,000 National Guardsmen" for his Jan. 6 rally, but Pelosi "rejected it."

A news article reported that Trump told the acting defense secretary the night before the rally that he thought 10,000 National Guard troops would be needed, but he did not make any clear request for 10,000 troops.

Pelosi’s spokesman said she was not consulted about the National Guard before Jan. 6. And the former House sergeant-at-arms, who reported to Pelosi, testified that he had no discussions about National Guard troops with any congressional leaders before Jan. 6.

Without evidence to back it, we rate Trump’s statement False.

[royamcr]

DJHJ a right wing nut job site, figures...

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Overall, we rate DJHJ Media extreme right biased and Questionable based on the use of poor sources, promotion of propaganda, and conspiracy theories, as well as consistent one-sided sensationalized reporting.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Sensationalism
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

[pfunkdenver]

Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

you do know T offered troops and P and C-police turned it down for that Jan 6th thingy. Add in the FBI and it was almost like a set up

Complete and utter bullshit! You guys will believe anything!

https://www.politifact.com/factcheck...troops-jan-6-/

[bambino]

Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

Complete and utter bullshit! You guys will believe anything!

https://www.politifact.com/factcheck...troops-jan-6-/

And you believe Politifact!!!!!

[pfunkdenver]

Originally Posted by bambino

And you believe Politifact!!!!!

Over the nonsensical propaganda sites you link to? Unquestionably!

[winn dixie]

politifact

future dnc speech writers

[royamcr]

Originally Posted by bambino

And you believe Politifact!!!!!

Refute their articles with alternative facts then.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by royamcr

Refute their articles with alternative facts then.

They are alternative “facts”.