Quote:
Originally Posted by Northerndancer
Free Lancer
I understand your point but isn’t there an inconsistency in your logic? Didn’t the court just also over rule states rights to implement local gun laws as per local constituents? Not agree or disagreeing with either ruling but the application of logic seems to be inconsistent based on desired outcome, which is not something I want my court to be doing. It’s just bad for business if I can’t predict what the rules will be.
Bugsy sorry to distract from the desired purpose of the board. Your point is well taken.
|
No, the Court ruled over states infringing upon an individual's constitutional right to bear arms. In both rulings, liberty was extended to citizens, not taken away.