Why A Yes Vote For The Iran Nuclear Deal Is A No-Brainer

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

This is rich, they'll tell us!

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/f39b3...-cheating-deal

Key paragraphs:

Despite a track record of misjudgments about weapons of mass destruction, U.S. intelligence officials say they are confident they can verify Iran's compliance with the recently completed nuclear deal.

The main reason, according to a classified joint intelligence assessment presented to Congress, is that the deal requires Iran to provide an unprecedented volume of information about nearly every aspect of its existing nuclear program, which Iran insists is peaceful. That data will make checking on compliance easier, officials say, because it will shrink Iran's capacity to hide a covert weapons program.
....
As part of the deal, Iran agreed to disclose nearly every element of its nuclear supply chain, including people, places, companies and infrastructure — "their entire nose-to-tail process for uranium production and processing," as one U.S. intelligence official put it, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly.

Those disclosures would vastly increase the chances that intelligence agencies would catch cheating, officials told Congress in classified briefings. That's because any illicit activity would have to take place outside the established network that had been laid bare to the West. Once the CIA knows all the places Iran has been importing and processing nuclear material, the country would have to develop new avenues to evade detection— a major undertaking. The briefings and the assessment were described by officials only on condition of anonymity.

==========================
That's rich. Honey, I'm not cheating on you. I gave you a complete list of all my ex girlfriends, current girlfriends, ho's, strippers, massage girls,etc to you before we wed. I swear. And I kept that list updated!

Your wife doesn't have the US Air Force and spy satellites at the ready. More disingenuous equivocation. Nuclear sites aren't girlfriends or strippers. To build a new facility would require activity that satellites will pick up. What part of that don't you understand?

We can read a license plate on a car from 400 miles up. You don't think we can see them building an entirely new complex? Get real.

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

This is rich, they'll tell us!

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/f39b3...-cheating-deal

Key paragraphs:

Despite a track record of misjudgments about weapons of mass destruction, U.S. intelligence officials say they are confident they can verify Iran's compliance with the recently completed nuclear deal.

The main reason, according to a classified joint intelligence assessment presented to Congress, is that the deal requires Iran to provide an unprecedented volume of information about nearly every aspect of its existing nuclear program, which Iran insists is peaceful. That data will make checking on compliance easier, officials say, because it will shrink Iran's capacity to hide a covert weapons program.
....
As part of the deal, Iran agreed to disclose nearly every element of its nuclear supply chain, including people, places, companies and infrastructure — "their entire nose-to-tail process for uranium production and processing," as one U.S. intelligence official put it, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly.

Those disclosures would vastly increase the chances that intelligence agencies would catch cheating, officials told Congress in classified briefings. That's because any illicit activity would have to take place outside the established network that had been laid bare to the West. Once the CIA knows all the places Iran has been importing and processing nuclear material, the country would have to develop new avenues to evade detection— a major undertaking. The briefings and the assessment were described by officials only on condition of anonymity.

==========================
That's rich. Honey, I'm not cheating on you. I gave you a complete list of all my ex girlfriends, current girlfriends, ho's, strippers, massage girls,etc to you before we wed. I swear. And I kept that list updated!

" And , just like Shrillary, I keep it updated on an offsite "secure" server that's "cleaned" frequently " !

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

What does the first General/Admirals letter say if the Iranians cheat other than all options are on the table? All bark, no bite.

If Iran is caught cheating, the consequences will be the USA will strictly enforce the deal and attack Iran if necessary.

The 34th senator has confirmed that there is another yes vote for the deal. If the republicans try to override the veto it will be blocked by the democrats. This is a good thing.

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-secures-...225100566.html

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by flghtr65

If Iran is caught cheating, the consequences will be the USA will strictly enforce the deal and attack Iran if necessary.
...

That's a big issue.

We won't. Again, there are no realistic consequences. The sanctions were falling apart and there is no chance the "snap back sanctions" will happen. There will be no military attack on Iran as long as President Obama is in office.
It's even weaker than the Syrian red line.

That's why Kerry constantly begged Iran to come back to the negotiating table.
But hey, enjoy the cheap oil while it lasts.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

That's a big issue.

We won't. Again, there are no realistic consequences. The sanctions were falling apart and there is no chance the "snap back sanctions" will happen. There will be no military attack on Iran as long as President Obama is in office.
It's even weaker than the Syrian red line.

That's why Kerry constantly begged Iran to come back to the negotiating table.
But hey, enjoy the cheap oil while it lasts.

The other countries involved in the negotiations didn't want a military attack either. Numnuts.

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

That's a big issue.

We won't. Again, there are no realistic consequences. The sanctions were falling apart and there is no chance the "snap back sanctions" will happen. There will be no military attack on Iran as long as President Obama is in office.

Just speculation by you. The administration intends to strictly enforce this deal, with military force if necessary. If not that would make Joe Biden a liar.

The two have been talking all along, but about 10 days ago, Coons told reporters, he and Biden went through a whole series of Coons’s concerns. The senator wanted public assurances that the administration would use military force against Iran if necessary, that it would redouble efforts to maintain Israel’s military edge, and that it would pursue enforcement with as much vigor as it did this deal, among other things.

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-secures-...225100566.html

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

This is rich, they'll tell us!

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/f39b3...-cheating-deal


==========================
That's rich. Honey, I'm not cheating on you. I gave you a complete list of all my ex girlfriends, current girlfriends, ho's, strippers, massage girls,etc to you before we wed. I swear. And I kept that list updated!

Don't worry if Iran cheats, you will get the war that you and Lindsay Gram wanted all along.

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by flghtr65

If Iran is caught cheating, the consequences will be the USA will strictly enforce the deal and attack Iran if necessary.

The 34th senator has confirmed that there is another yes vote for the deal. If the republicans try to override the veto it will be blocked by the democrats. This is a good thing.

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-secures-...225100566.html

Iran will cheat. There will be no consequences. It doesn't matter.

[IIFFOFRDB]

[southtown4488]

Paranoid idiots

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by southtown4488

Paranoid idiots

[flghtr65]

Trump will work to strictly enforce the Iran nuclear deal, if elected President.

http://news.yahoo.com/trump-republic...131002899.html

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by flghtr65

Just speculation by you. The administration intends to strictly enforce this deal, with military force if necessary. If not that would make Joe Biden a liar.

The two have been talking all along, but about 10 days ago, Coons told reporters, he and Biden went through a whole series of Coons’s concerns. The senator wanted public assurances that the administration would use military force against Iran if necessary, that it would redouble efforts to maintain Israel’s military edge, and that it would pursue enforcement with as much vigor as it did this deal, among other things.

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-secures-...225100566.html

Not much difference between my "speculation" and their "intentions." Where in the agreement is it written that Iran will be attacked if they don't follow the agreement?

So let me get this straight, Congress had days of televised and secret sessions with Kerry, et al where they had a chance to ask questions and grandstand...but Uncle Joe is able to convince some of them that this is a good deal behind closed doors. Smells like a smoke filled room.

Originally Posted by flghtr65

Don't worry if Iran cheats, you will get the war that you and Lindsay Gram wanted all along.

I don't want a war. You want me to want a war. Where have I vowed to wipe Iran off the face of the earth?

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

I don't want a war. You want me to want a war. Where have I vowed to wipe Iran off the face of the earth?

Ws it about the same time that you bought into Shrubbie and Cheney's vow to "wipe" Iraq "off of the face of the earth?"

Dipshit Turdfly!

[wellendowed1911]

Where is Whirlaway? I would very much like to speak to him- can someone tell me where I can find him?