Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Guest040616 · 06-02-2012, 07:56 PM

32 days, who wants the over?
Who wants the under?

Marshall · 06-02-2012, 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigmex

32 days, who wants the over?
Who wants the under?

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! If you had enough money I'd take whatever side of that bet you did't want. LOL! If you had money and I wanted it; you couldn't stop me from taking it and keeping it. HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

Munchmasterman · 06-02-2012, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marshall

No. My notification of ban says unnecessary rudeness. I don't see any rule regarding changing quoted posts in the rules thread. If there was I'd obey the rules like I always do. If a moderator makes up rules that apply to only me; or apply non-Sandbox rules to me while I'm in the Sandbox; or so misinterpret rules against me; then I can't do anything about that. If I get banned while following the rules then the rules mean nothing. Liberals don't believe in the rule of law either.

Of course you don't see anything wrong with changing some one's words. Whirly likes that re-write history too.

Why would you have a problem changing something in anyone's quotes? At least whirly et Al don't change quotes.

PS Nice to see you accept personal responsibility for your own actions....not.
The influence of the liberals is too much for you, you can't help yourself. It was all a liberal conspiracy to remove marshal because he tells the truth no one wants to hear.(see him changing quotes as earlier mentioned).
It seems a shame that trading political punches on a national board with 30 other people is the place and forum that defines you.

PPS You were seldom spoken of while you were gone. A few people were compared to you. That's about it.

Marshall · 06-02-2012, 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cockmunchmasterman

Of course you don't see anything wrong with changing some one's words. Whirly likes that re-write history too.

Why would you have a problem changing something in anyone's quotes? At least whirly et Al don't change quotes.

PS Nice to see you accept personal responsibility for your own actions....not.
The influence of the liberals is too much for you, you can't help yourself. It was all a liberal conspiracy to remove marshal because he tells the truth no one wants to hear.(see him changing quotes as earlier mentioned).
It seems a shame that trading political punches on a national board with 30 other people is the place and forum that defines you.

PPS You were seldom spoken of while you were gone. A few people were compared to you. That's about it.

Trading political punches? You liberal filth are just punching bags. Punching bags don't punch back. HA!HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

You're a disgusting fat body. Why did you take down that avatar picture of yourself in the hillbilly-mobile? Were you ashamed of it because you looked like Chaz Bono in that picture? HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

Munchmasterman · 06-02-2012, 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marshall

Trading political punches? You liberal filth are just punching bags. Punching bags don't punch back. HA!HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

You're a disgusting fat body. Why did you take down that avatar picture of yourself in the hillbilly-mobile? Were you ashamed of it because you looked like Chaz Bono in that picture? HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

You remember my avatar? Like I said, you don't have much of a life.
Everybody is a fat body to a meth freak. What else could you be?
Ho!! Ho!! Ho!! Ho!! Ho!! Ho!! Ho!! And no, not mimicking you. Just called you a ho, 7 times.

And I d't think you'll get banned.
I think your parole will be revoked before you get banned.

WTF · 06-02-2012, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marshall

No. My notification of ban says unnecessary rudeness. I don't see any rule regarding changing quoted posts in the rules thread. If there was I'd obey the rules like I always do. If a moderator makes up rules that apply to only me; or apply non-Sandbox rules to me while I'm in the Sandbox; or so misinterpret rules against me; then I can't do anything about that. If I get banned while following the rules then the rules mean nothing. Liberals don't believe in the rule of law either.

No , I am pretty sure we have had this conversation...changing quotes is a no no.

You will find out soon enough...

cptjohnstone · 06-02-2012, 10:11 PM

welcome back but by November there will not be any donkeys to kick around

from Rasmussen today

"Following Jobs Reports, Consumer Confidence Drops Five Points Overnight"

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll: Romney 48%, Obama 44% up 4-5 points!

Election 2012: Ohio President
Ohio: Romney 46%, Obama 44%

Election 2012: Florida President
Florida: Romney 46%, Obama 45%

Election 2012: Virginia President
Virginia: Romney 45%, Obama 44%

Election 2012: Missouri President
Missouri: Romney 48%, Obama 45%

Election 2012: North Carolina President
North Carolina: Romney 51%, Obama 43%

Election 2012: Massachusetts President
Massachusetts: Obama 56%, Romney 35%
what is it in Massachushit? this reminds me when Reagan won 48 states

and somewhere I read the Independents are 10% more for Mitt, people are finally seeing the light

Chica Chaser · 06-02-2012, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marshall

That is a good question. ChicoChaser is not directly moderating this forum anymore. Maybe the current moderators won't ban me for unnecessary rudeness. I didn't see that rule in the Sandbox. I thought being rude in the Sandbox was the point. LOL! I guess ChicoChaser figured the liberal scum around here were a bunch of stupid pussies who couldn't defend themselves against me. HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

Yeah, that's it. LOL! You may want to rethink sentence one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marshall

No. My notification of ban says unnecessary rudeness. I don't see any rule regarding changing quoted posts in the rules thread. If there was I'd obey the rules like I always do. If a moderator makes up rules that apply to only me; or apply non-Sandbox rules to me while I'm in the Sandbox; or so misinterpret rules against me; then I can't do anything about that. If I get banned while following the rules then the rules mean nothing. Liberals don't believe in the rule of law either.

Welcome back. You and I both know what you were banned for. Both times.
Please see the PM I just sent you. Might as well get started off on the right foot.

CuteOldGuy · 06-02-2012, 11:06 PM

Hi Marshall, Are you keeping the Af-Freakin handle, or will you just be going by Marshall now?

joe bloe · 06-02-2012, 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cptjohnstone

welcome back but by November there will not be any donkeys to kick around

from Rasmussen today

"Following Jobs Reports, Consumer Confidence Drops Five Points Overnight"

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll: Romney 48%, Obama 44% up 4-5 points!

Election 2012: Ohio President
Ohio: Romney 46%, Obama 44%

Election 2012: Florida President
Florida: Romney 46%, Obama 45%

Election 2012: Virginia President
Virginia: Romney 45%, Obama 44%

Election 2012: Missouri President
Missouri: Romney 48%, Obama 45%

Election 2012: North Carolina President
North Carolina: Romney 51%, Obama 43%

Election 2012: Massachusetts President
Massachusetts: Obama 56%, Romney 35%
what is it in Massachushit? this reminds me when Reagan won 48 states

and somewhere I read the Independents are 10% more for Mitt, people are finally seeing the light

Reagan won 49 states in 1984 against Mondale. Mondale only won his home state, Minnesota, by less than four thousand votes. Reagan had considered one last campaign swing through Minnesota, but decided against it. If he had gone back to Minnesota, he probably would have all fifty states.

Obama's goal is to win all 57 states.

Guest040616 · 06-03-2012, 04:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigtex

32 days, who wants the over?
Who wants the under?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

Yeah, that's it. LOL! You may want to rethink sentence one.

Welcome back. You and I both know what you were banned for. Both times.
Please see the PM I just sent you. Might as well get started off on the right foot.

I suspect there could be a strong push for "the under!"

I B Hankering · 06-03-2012, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

PPS You were seldom spoken of while you were gone. A few people were compared to you. That's about it.

http://www.eccie.net/search.php?searchid=16065984

It's a shame that ECCIE has no "Eat Shit and Die" emoticon - it would be appropriate here.

IIFFOFRDB · 06-03-2012, 02:38 PM

IB hope this helps you feed BigTits. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3IyM7TX44g

WTF · 06-03-2012, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

http://www.eccie.net/search.php?searchid=16065984

It's a shame that ECCIE has no "Eat Shit and Die" emoticon - it would be appropriate here.

IB, this is the jest of posting concerning Marshall since he was banned. I just looked at threads with 2 or fewer pages. Not a ringing endorsment. I think COG missed him the most! LOL Actually I think COG thought Af Freakn was Marshall. Not even close. Af has a nice rack and is just jacking with ya'll with the ebonics talk!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Randy4Candy

Not exactly the same situation, not even close - but you know that. You any kin to Marshall?

.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

WW, if you are going to post every one of Obama's lies, you will pass me on the posting list and give Af-Marshall-Fuckup a different avatar to jack off to.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Finally, Marshall Fuckup, you got one right! Congrats!

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

He's a fake. Just Marshall trying to get back in. Pay no attention.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Marshall Fuckup. Tiger is Filipino. Not black.

Doove · 06-03-2012, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

Af has a nice rack and is just jacking with ya'll with the ebonics talk!

Yeah, but keep in mind, these are people who think Obama's a socialist we're dealing with here.