Anybody Watching The Confirmation Hearing?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Pity that Booker is right. From top to bottom, he's right on. There is no logical defense for his request.

While I won't stoop to name calling the opposition party -- it is unconscionable that Republicans are crying about obstructionism after the disgraceful disposition of the last SCOTUS nomination.

And now to use the word "hypocritical" is, well, hypocritical!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH!

Booker is a grand standing charlatan. He has no intention of ever voting for Kavanaugh. Booker's bitching about documents that came in last night is nonsense considering he still as multiple days to review those documents before there is an actual vote on Kavanaugh. Hence, Booker looks really stupid as he disingenuously argues he hasn't had a chance to look at those documents when it's entirely incumbent on him to make time to look at those documents.

[gfejunkie]

They all said they wouldn't vote for the nominee before he was even named. They have no room to complain. Nothing they can do to stop the confirmation anyway. The dims are doing what they do best... Make themselves look like the fools they are.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

There is no logical defense for his request.

I agree. Booker's request is bogus and unreasonable. There is no logical defense for it.

Thanks for admitting the truth, yssup.

[friendly fred]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Pity that Booker is right. From top to bottom, he's right on. There is no logical defense for his request.

While I won't stoop to name calling the opposition party -- it is unconscionable that Republicans are crying about obstructionism after the disgraceful disposition of the last SCOTUS nomination.

And now to use the word "hypocritical" is, well, hypocritical!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH!

I personally enjoy the fact that the pure political power of the Republicans irritates the liberals. I hope they all have heart attacks and die and conservatives take over their seats - by conservatives, I mean conservatives wearing black masks to get elected then voting with the interests of the real Americans, the descendants of the founding fathers.

[friendly fred]

Originally Posted by lustylad

I agree. Booker's request is bogus and unreasonable. There is no logical defense for it.

Thanks for admitting the truth, yssup.

It is rare when he admits what his side is up to, I'm glad you caught that.

[friendly fred]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Booker is a grand standing charlatan. He has no intention of ever voting for Kavanaugh. Booker's bitching about documents that came in last night is nonsense considering he still as multiple days to review those documents before there is an actual vote on Kavanaugh. Hence, Booker looks really stupid as he disingenuously argues he hasn't had a chance to look at those documents when it's entirely incumbent on him to make time to look at those documents.

Booker is too lazy to look at the documents.

[Yssup Rider]

LOL! And why do you say he’s lazy?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA?????

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by friendly fred

Booker is too lazy to look at the documents.

Booker is too busy trying to raise money for his presidential bid to trouble himself with either the hearing or to look at documents. Booker sent out an email to raise money during today's hearing.

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

These dims are ridiculous. Every dim there has already announced that they will not vote to confirm Kavanaugh; hence, Booker, et al's, demand for additional documents is pure obstructionism. And Blumenthal's stance that the withheld documents are "property of the people" given the dim's previous stance of hildebeest's Secretary of State emails is also hypocritical.

And obama's college transcripts/birth certificate etc.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

The Dems are in full panic mode.

The Maxine Waters Syndrome is alive and well in the Senate.

[nevergaveitathought]

Originally Posted by Hotrod511

I see where this Hollywood lib was removed from the hearing

lost track of this woman as I guess her career hit the skids, although I never went out of my way to track her you know

thought she was ok in that tv show she was in on one of those many cable channels

covert affairs I think it was

maybe shes trying to regenerate her acting career by doing anything to get back in the limelight

I do like the no make up look however, or perhaps its cleverly applied light make up, or maybe it takes heavy make up on her to even begin to look like no make up, I don't know

[friendly fred]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

LOL! And why do you say he’s lazy?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA?????

From what I've seen of him, he looks like he wants others to do the hard work while he gets the glory and privilege.

[nevergaveitathought]

Originally Posted by friendly fred

From what I've seen of him, he looks like he wants others to do the hard work while he gets the glory and privilege.

that's the way it is in almost all endeavors save proprietorships

the rainmakers (attention seekers) versus the technical competents

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

thought she was ok in that tv show she was in ...

maybe shes trying to regenerate her acting career by doing anything to get back in the limelight

I do like the no make up look however, or perhaps its cleverly applied light make up, or maybe it takes heavy make up on her to even begin to look like no make up, I don't know

This look is better and she'd probably still be in the room!

[00 gauge]

These Dimocrats in the Senate sure do know how to run a circus ..... who needs Barnum and Bailey when you have these clowns? .....