Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Why is it that most of the people bothered by this are conservatives?
Liberals want people to have the freedom to choose, but only if they make the "correct" choice.
Address what? The fact that in a nation of 300,000,000 people that you found a case of voter fraud? Or 10? Or another statistically insignificant number?
No one said there weren't any. Any elections you have proof they affected?
Trick question. That number of elections would be what in the big picture?
Statistically insignificant.
And as you're so fond of saying, he voted illegally.
Just like he possessed a firearm illegally.
If the current laws for gun control are enough, then so are the voting laws.
If it is too much of a roadblock to gun ownership to wait 3 days to pick it up, what is requiring ID that many potential voters, legal in every way and at least as much an American as you, have difficulty in obtaining?
You whine and bitch about government but have no problem throwing huge numbers of people into the "catch 22" process of obtaining a government ID after losing the original.
If you see one roach in your kitchen, and kill it, is the problem solved? You're an idiot, MünchausenMan. And how is it a "Catch-22" to require people to prove they are eligible to vote before we allow them to vote? Why do you want non-citizens to vote?
Did they vote?
No, they didn't.
And they were auto registered to vote when they got their drivers licenses. The same ID they would present as identification to vote.
So you're totally cool with letting the 9/11 hijackers register to vote? Even though they were obviously ineligible? It doesn't indicate a problem of any kind to you, dickmuncher?
Sure.... here's a couple, for starters, and they're just the tip of the iceberg!
"The evidence is indisputable that aliens, both legal and illegal, are registering and voting in federal, state, and local elections. Following a mayor's race in Compton, California, for example, aliens testified under oath in court that they voted in the election.[8] In that case, a candidate who was elected to the city council was permanently disqualified from holding public office in California for soliciting non-citizens to register and vote.[9] The fact that non-citizens registered and voted in the election would never have been discovered except for the fact that it was a very close election and the incumbent mayor, who lost by less than 300 votes, contested it.[10]
Similarly, a 1996 congressional race in California may have been stolen by non-citizen voting.[11] Republican incumbent Bob Dornan was defending himself against a spirited challenger, Democrat Loretta Sanchez. Sanchez won the election by just 979 votes, and Dornan contested the election in the U.S. House of Representatives. His challenge was dismissed after an investigation by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform turned up only 624 invalid votes by non-citizens who were present in the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) database because they had applied for citizenship, as well as another 124 improper absentee ballots.[12] The investigation, however, could not detect illegal aliens, who were not in the INS records."
Read the entire link for more examples, dickmuncher. You know it's happening. You know it's easy. You know it's rampant. If all those non-citizens were voting Republican, you would be banging the drums and screaming VOTER FRAUD at the top of your lungs!
"If you see one roach in your kitchen, and kill it, is the problem solved? You're an idiot, MünchausenMan. And how is it a "Catch-22" to require people to prove they are eligible to vote before we allow them to vote? Why do you want non-citizens to vote?"
In this new video released by Project Veritas, James O’Keefe exposes what everyone except Democrats have known to be true. There is a lot of voter fraud.
Since you have missed the fact I never said fraud didn't occur it's no surprise you think these examples back up election outcomes were changed. These aren't proof of the outcome of an election being changed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad
Sure.... here's a couple, for starters, and they're just the tip of the iceberg!
"The evidence is indisputable that aliens, both legal and illegal, are registering and voting in federal, state, and local elections. Following a mayor's race in Compton, California, for example, aliens testified under oath in court that they voted in the election.[8] In that case, a candidate who was elected to the city council was permanently disqualified from holding public office in California for soliciting non-citizens to register and vote.[9] The fact that non-citizens registered and voted in the election would never have been discovered except for the fact that it was a very close election and the incumbent mayor, who lost by less than 300 votes, contested it.[10]
Similarly, a 1996 congressional race in California may have been stolen by non-citizen voting.[11] Republican incumbent Bob Dornan was defending himself against a spirited challenger, Democrat Loretta Sanchez. Sanchez won the election by just 979 votes, and Dornan contested the election in the U.S. House of Representatives. His challenge was dismissed after an investigation by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform turned up only 624 invalid votes by non-citizens who were present in the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) database because they had applied for citizenship, as well as another 124 improper absentee ballots.[12] The investigation, however, could not detect illegal aliens, who were not in the INS records."
Read the entire link for more examples, dickmuncher. You know it's happening. You know it's easy. You know it's rampant. If all those non-citizens were voting Republican, you would be banging the drums and screaming VOTER FRAUD at the top of your lungs!
Florida Voter Rolls at Risk: Broward County Supervisor of Elections put on Notice
August 5, 2016/in Elections, Must Read, Policy, Politics, Waste, Fraud and Abuse /by Ruth Roman
PART I: Investigative Report — Voter Fraud in Florida
Broward County Supervisor of Elections, Dr. Brenda C. Snipes has adopted a logo which reads: “Vote with confidence;” unfortunately, if past elections under her tutelage are an indicator, we are in for an array of disenfranchisement tactics aimed to skew the electoral process in a fraudulent and partisan fashion. In subsequent articles, these practices will be elaborated on with the fervent expectation that voter awareness will not only condemn the contemplation of such activity, but will rise to prevent it.
Voter integrity and potential voter fraud has been a major topic of concern for many watchdog groups in Florida for quite some time. In my investigative Report in November of 2012, after the last presidential election, I interviewed a whistleblower from Broward County Supervisor of Elections Office of Brenda C. Snipes, who revealed to me that many election laws were broken when:
Election officials were assisting voters who were not handicapped and were using special unauthorized forms to do this
There were obvious irregularities in the absentee ballots
There was a lack of scanning machines during the voting process, despite the fact that there were plenty in storage that could have been used.
Dr. Snipes duties and obligations as an elected official, are to uphold voter integrity in a non-partisan fashion, ensuring that no voter is disenfranchised. This investigative report will reveal that not only have voter records not been maintained properly, Brenda Snipes has not been in compliance with the law.
On June 27, 2016, a lawsuit was filed against Brenda Snipes, Supervisor of Elections, after her refusal to discuss a resolution with the American Civil Rights Union in regard to its claim of potential violations of federal election law in Broward County, Florida.
In this case, Andrea Bellitto and the American Civil Rights Union vs. Brenda Snipes, Supervisor of Elections, allegations put forth reveal that:
Snipes has been negligent in maintaining accurate voter rolls and removing names of ineligible voters from the official list of voters by reason of death or change of residence of the registrant as pursuant to federal election law.
Over the past several election cycles the voter rolls maintained by Dr. Snipes have either more total registrants than eligible voting citizens or an implausibly high number
Approximately 106% of the citizens of voting age were registered to vote and cast a ballot in Broward County. Snipes in this case, received information regarding over 200 registered voters in one community in Coconut Creek who have either died or who no longer reside in the community.
The National Voters Right Act 1965 requires that Dr. Snipes shall complete, not later than 90 days prior to the date of a primary or general election for federal office, any program that systematically removes the name of ineligible voters from that official lists of eligible voters.
My investigation reveals that Dr. Snipes’ has received citizen complaints to clean up the voter rolls dating back to October of 2015, also followed by a November 2015 Public Records request. However, there has been no resolution to them.
Surprisingly, another watchdog organization, True The Vote, in its 16 Florida County investigation, discovered at least 36,000 voter registrations that had serious problems. Their investigation uncovered over 15,400 sets of duplicated voter registrations, 221 potential cases of double voting, 2,400 cases of voters over the age of 105 displaying recent periods of inactivity, 185 cases of illegally claimed residential addresses located at commercial mailbox stores, 500+ cases of incomplete voter registrations, 2,500+ cases of incomplete voter registrations entered into the Florida voter roll that were missing legal names.
Dr. Snipes, S.O.E., holds a Constitutional Office in the State of Florida and has taken an oath to: “conduct successful elections in compliance with the law to ensure that every eligible voter can exercise the right to vote, while providing a non-partisan, stable and positive environment built upon respect, growth, creativity and freethinking.” It is a felony to willfully submit any false voter registration information, in accordance with F.S.104.011(2).
No voter in the State of Florida should be disenfranchised and Ms. Snipes has a responsibility to her constituents to abide by the law. Perhaps, the Broward County voter rolls will be cleaned up, as have been in other state counties. However, time is of the essence, as we have a critical presidential election in November; the time for action is now. We must anticipate and challenge any protocol or activity that enables fraud or partisanship behavior and hold Dr. Snipes and her staff accountable.
Are There Signs of A Voter Fraud Scheme in Broward County Florida? A Handful of Mistakes and 173,000 Solutions…
Posted on October 26, 2016 by sundance
Small “Mistakes” and 173,000 “Solutions”…
Anyone with any political knowledge is aware the best chances for Hillary Clinton in Florida come from two specific counties, Broward and Dade. It is not coincidental that both counties continue to be the historic nucleus of multiple voting irregularities.
This year is no different. In a recent series of events Broward County is at the epicenter of another voting malfunction. However, this one might not be a mistake, it might be by design. The essential outline of the current year concern surrounds a scheme to present double voting to benefit Hillary Clinton:
broward-county-election-1
Broward County officials intentionally screw up sending out mail-in ballots to a key demographic constituency. The correction therein then allows the same official to send a second set of ballots to the same constituency thus providing two possibly counted ballots for each voter.
Sounds incredible. Maybe. But as incredulous as it sounds that’s exactly what’s taking place.
The issue stems around the second page of the ballot for a ballot initiative, a specifically democrat ballot initiative, an amendment to Florida’s constitution, Amendment #2, whereby legalized marijuana is up for a vote.
Charlie-Crist-John-Morgan-in-Florida-TrendThe Amendment #2 ballot initiative is the long-standing objective of John Morgan an Orlando lawyer who is the name and face behind the Morgan and Morgan law firm.
John Morgan, lives in Orlando and is a big donor and benefactor of the Democrat party. You might remember it was John Morgan who hired former governor Charlie Crist (Republican, then Independent, then Democrat) after his failed Senate bid. John Morgan is also attached to the Multi-billion Pigford settlements via a partner in his law firm Greg Francis.
John Morgan is also a key donor, financial bundler, and contributor to President Obama and Hillary Clinton. Morgan has hosted numerous high-dollar ($30k+ per plate) events for Obama and this year for Hillary Clinton.
Legalized marijuana sales in Florida, under the auspices and ruse of “medical marijuana”, has been a goal of Morgan for several years. Politically, Morgan also wants to be FL Attorney General and/or U.S Attorney General.
By structuring a flawed ballot distribution in Broward County both Hillary Clinton and John Morgan can achieve both their objectives. A rather brilliant Win/Win.
The scheme works by “accidentally” failing to print one of the pages in a strategic regional area guaranteed to be dominated by Clinton/Morgan supporters. It takes only a modicum of ‘plausible deniability‘ to provide the arms-length distance from a scheme.
Sending out “some” or “a few” ballots with a blank page, a “flaw” per se’, then resending an entire second set of ballots (173,000) to the full area, provides multiple opportunities.
See if you can spot how it plays out. Beginning with the small flaw:
Since you have missed the fact I never said fraud didn't occur it's no surprise you think these examples back up election outcomes were changed. These aren't proof of the outcome of an election being changed.
So your arguement is that there isn't that much cheating going on. Ok. Got it.
