US created lower-than-expected 156,000 jobs in September

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Typical little dipshit. How about posting the entire article that graph came from.

Jim


http://money.cnn.com/2016/01/13/news...-of-the-union/

Yeah, even the Clinton News Network website link bashed Odumbo for using those numbers:


"He's correct...if you look at the data in the most favorable way possible for him.

The United States has only added about 9.3 million jobs during his term -- from the time Obama took office in January 2009 through December 2015.

That's the most conventional way to assess a president's economic track record. Viewing it that way means Obama is pretty far behind the job creation of Reagan and Clinton....

The Obama administration derives (their) figure by looking at how many private sector jobs (so excluding government jobs) have been added since the lowest point during the Great Recession. In other words, instead of starting at January 2009, the White House starts the clock in February 2010."


Don't be so hard on asswipe. He understands zilch about economics. He's just a loyal DNC foot soldier, posting whatever falsely-spun talking points his dimotard puppeteers feed him.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

More people entered the workforce during September.

Hahahahaha... look at that, folks! Oinkboy is commenting on economics! As if he knows anything about unemployment!

Hey piggy, when are you going to razzle-dazzle us by answering the question I posed to you last time you pretended to know anything about tabulating the jobless rate?

Reminder – BLS stands for Bureau of Labor Statistics, not what you offer to your gloryhole customers!

Originally Posted by lustylad

Here's a question for you, Asswipe. We all want to be fair, so we'll give you a chance to redeem yourself on the subject of labor economics. How many separate unemployment measures does the BLS publish each month, and how are they different?

C'mon oinkboy, give it a shot!

Don't be lazy! Google it!

You can do it! We're all rooting for you!

[DSK]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Why? You didn't attack anything, fool.

Why did you find the article interesting?

DId you read it?

Where did you find it?

See how this works?

Combine weak job creation with a discouraged workforce and low labor rate participation, and you have a formula for a nation losing its former greatness.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Hahahahaha... look at that, folks! Oinkboy is commenting on economics! As if he knows anything about unemployment!

Hey piggy, when are you going to razzle-dazzle us by answering the question I posed to you last time you pretended to know anything about tabulating the jobless rate?

Reminder – BLS stands for Bureau of Labor Statistics, not what you offer to your gloryhole customers!

Asswipe is too lazy and stupid to answer that question.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by DSK

Asswipe is too lazy and stupid to answer that question.

I know that, but the "BLS" reference always makes the pig start smacking his lips.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by lustylad

I know that, but the "BLS" reference always makes the pig start smacking his lips.

He is Pavlov's pig in that respect!

[Mr MojoRisin]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Yeah, even the Clinton News Network website link bashed Odumbo for using those numbers:


"He's correct...if you look at the data in the most favorable way possible for him.

The United States has only added about 9.3 million jobs during his term -- from the time Obama took office in January 2009 through December 2015.

That's the most conventional way to assess a president's economic track record. Viewing it that way means Obama is pretty far behind the job creation of Reagan and Clinton....

The Obama administration derives (their) figure by looking at how many private sector jobs (so excluding government jobs) have been added since the lowest point during the Great Recession. In other words, instead of starting at January 2009, the White House starts the clock in February 2010."


Don't be so hard on asswipe. He understands zilch about economics. He's just a loyal DNC foot soldier, posting whatever falsely-spun talking points his dimotard puppeteers feed him.

Don't even get me started on that goofy fucker. The House Fly is the most irritating creature on earth and Assup can piss a fly off. He's lucky he's behind a keyboard.

Jim