It's me or it's free guarantee?? Can it really be??

[amusemeant]

Originally Posted by scorpioseventy7

I think some people just read too much into this guarantee thing. A guarantee is just what we think it is, its a promise. A promise that the person in the photos are indeed the advertising provider. With so many girls blurring out their facial features it's hard to prove if it's the provider's actual photos or not, so it's not the most ingenious way to counter all of the fake adverts, but I commend the effort to at least acknowledge that there is a problem and that real steps are being taken to separate the genuine from the phonies. Now the guarantee for the photos being of the provider suits me just fine, however if it were say "If my photos doesn't portray my RL appearance accurately then it's free" then thats a entirely different story.

Well said - with this, I agree...

[Logan135]

Isis's avatar looks like a young kirsty allie to me.......still pretty new to this and have been selective, haven't encountered any fake pictures but have seen one who's pictures weren't the most recent....

[Bella_HHD]

Originally Posted by Ed Highlight

[ ... ]

With that said, Isis - who is that a photo of in your avatar?? Is that you being less incognito or is it someone I just don't recognize (very pretty btw)?? If that's not you, and I just called you out, does that mean I got a freebie coming?!?!?

Forgive the hijack, but I've been wondering the same - I'm thinking it was an 80's era Phillie-based model?

If so, she was incredibly beautiful and tragic.

[lisa.lisa0302]

Lots of ladies of do it, and a portion of those are using bait and switch pics, which cracks me up, and the gentlemen still stays for the session, makes me giggle harder. Its a sucker trap.

If you are using real recent pics, why bother that with mess.

To each their own though.

[incognito isis]

Ed, aint no such thing as a free lunch :-(
Bella, yes my avatar is of Gia Carangi the model from my city Phili.

Logan, thank you for bringing up aninteresting point; what if the pics are of the lady just from years past? YIKES! Unless you truely haven't changed much, maybe those could wash. But I think any reputable lady updates her photos every so often.

[rachet3375]

A guarantee is only as good as the company/person offering it...
and like you Isis, I hate being lied to or misled.

[incognito isis]

Thank you, Mr. Bridges for your input.

[SneakyCancer]

the warm and fuzzy life line to catch the fence straddlers. me or free....has a jingle that makes you say....how bad can it be? it must be free if she is not who she claims to be. but come on...im sure less than 1 percent actually got service for free. being that you show up and agree....mutual contract is in effect. to bust a nut and say give me my money back.....lol

[burkalini]

If a provider puts that in her ad I feel way more comfortable in that the photos are her. If they aren't then I have no qualm in sending her right back where she came from

[MOCHAakaMOCHA]

I've never put that and never worst because I don't trust many to have integrity anymore. I've had not many but a handful come and say like 2 days after I've taken my own pics that they don't look quite like me but close. And i'm like wtf you mean close when I took those the day before yesterday etc..... and they realized I wasn't falling for no games.

And i'm a nice person but lol to be honest if I was a guy i'd say to everybody that's not you so can we get started? lol My pics are always of me so i'd never use that line. I personally know people who say their pics are 100% real and i know they aren't them so imo putting it's me or it's free is just as pointless unless you wanna give it away for free.

Originally Posted by incognito isis

Most stores have a 60-90 day guarantee. If you are not satisfied with your purchase you take it back and receive a refund. But what about the "it's me or it's free" guarantee?

I've often wondered about that statement. I can clearly see how a man would be upset when the escort is not who is represented in her photos. I just can't get my head around this. If you went to an incall or met a lady and accused her of using fake photos, wouldn't that completely destroy the mood right then and there for both parties?

Fellas, has anyone ACTUALLY given it up for free when you acused them of fake photos?

Ladies, do you use that motto in your ad? What is the point of the guarantee? If you are not who is in the photos, and you give a free session, do you really think that is going to avoid a negative review? A man will write a negative review if you lied to him in any way. He has been deceived. I get angry when I'm lied to also.


If somone accused me of using fake photos I would be offended and the meeting would be off. Both go our seperate ways. The last thing I would do is engage in a meeting. I'd be pissed!

Also, wouldn't making a statement like "it's me or it's free" garner the freebie fishers to respond? Aren't there enough scammers out there? I feel that statement is a welcome for people who might try to trick you. I mean we do not live in the most honest world in the universe. Any fella can come over and act irate and say: "you are not the lady in the ad I saw." Knowing full well he never had any intention of paying for it in the first place. But there was that guarentee.....

I'm just sayin...

[MotoMoto]

The ones that crack me up are the ones that say that, but have really nasty photos...like if they were B&S... that would be the fake photo

[charlestudor2005]

The last time I paid any attention to that statement, I kicked the slats out of my cradle.

Here are the options:

• It could be her, just pics taken 10-20 years ago;
• It's not her (but the pic may be somewhat close)
• It is her, exactly as she looks

More often than not, I've found the pics to be those of the lady I see. However, the pics are taken in such a manner as to be flattering, and she is not nearly as good looking in person as she is in her pics.

But paying attention to the guarantee, IMHO, is foolish.

I've never called anyone on the guarantee, and never would; basically because I believe it's a worthless statement.

[Marcus Aurelius]

I have learned to study the way she takes her photos.

[Arion_Ali]

If it's not me get out of there!!!!
Lmao no seriously right??

[whitechocolate]

For one, you can usually tell the B&S photos or have a good idea and then do some additional research to confirm
Sometimes the Switch is actually better looking than the Bait but she just doesnt want to use her real photos
The additonal "If its not me it is free" does provide some room for negotiation if you really wanted to stay for a lower donation.
No way I would take off my clothes in a strange place if the session is actually FREE.