The DOJ and the FBI lied about the Tarmac meeting!

[Yssup Rider]

Holy shit!

The closer Mueller gets to the royal family, the higher the pitch of your squealing.

You DO know that Mueller and the Congressional committees are going to nail the criminal Turd Reich, right? How could they not? You don’t want it to happen, but these fucking amateurs don’t care.

They’re contradicting themselves every time they’re given a chance.

So naturally, you’re squealing about everyone else.

Makes perfect sense,

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

enjoy your melt down pansy!

Enjoy your workout! Make sure you eat your vitamins and minerals.

Heavy on the protein, of course.

And please keep those reviews coming.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by StandinStraight

You guys are pathetic, still believing conservative tabloid propaganda...

Did you read the links, Professor STANDINSHIT? Good! Now tell us exactly what you found inaccurate and why! Put your probing, critical thinking and analytical powers to work for us! That's what college professors do!

You are a college instructor, right? Are you tenured? Where do you teach? Pitt? Duquesne? Robert Morris? CMU?

Inquiring minds want to know!

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Makes perfect sense,

Thanks, oinkboy. For elevating the level of discourse with your inspired memes. Did you run out of fatgay.net pics?

No wonder iffy refers to you as shit eater.

[Guest123018-4]

The turd reich is falling, corrupt FBI agent now, soon the Clinton's. It will all be revealed.

The best thing about Trump is he is not the Heil Hillary.

[StandinStraight]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Did you read the links, Professor STANDINSHIT? Good! Now tell us exactly what you found inaccurate and why! Put your probing, critical thinking and analytical powers to work for us! That's what college professors do!

You are a college instructor, right? Are you tenured? Where do you teach? Pitt? Duquesne? Robert Morris? CMU?

Inquiring minds want to know!

Don’t be a idiot, the entire story is make believe, none of it is true, it’s published by a conservative think tank, totally tabloid. If it were true you would be hearing about it on all the network news and newspapers. You are a total gullible deplorable nutbag that’s why you believe it.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by StandinStraight

Don’t be a (sic) idiot, the entire story is make believe, none of it is true, it’s published by a conservative think tank, totally tabloid. If it were true you would be hearing about it on all the network news and newspapers. You are a total gullible deplorable nutbag that’s why you believe it.

Hmmm, ok. So you didn't read the links and you have no critical abilities. Glad we established that. As for being gullible, no one in this forum believes you ever taught a lick of anything at a college/university level. You don't even have enough substance to be a pile of shit to be "standin" in.

[kehaar]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Hmmm, ok. So you didn't read the links and you have no critical abilities. Glad we established that. As for being gullible, no one in this forum believes you ever taught a lick of anything at a college/university level. You don't even have enough substance to be a pile of shit to be "standin" in.

The nexus of their argument is that one can only believe the NYT, CNN, and their ilk. Everything else is a lie, and one should not investigate anything else because it will pollute your mind. That is mighty convenient(and characteristically fascist).

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Hmmm, ok. So you didn't read the links and you have no critical abilities. Glad we established that. As for being gullible, no one in this forum believes you ever taught a lick of anything at a college/university level. You don't even have enough substance to be a pile of shit to be "standin" in.

Mebbe he's a " Perfesser " of Peter Puffin' !!!

[nevergaveitathought]

Originally Posted by kehaar

The nexus of their argument is that one can only believe the NYT, CNN, and their ilk. Everything else is a lie, and one should not investigate anything else because it will pollute your mind. That is mighty convenient(and characteristically fascist).

you mean all those sources who breathlessly reported all that incriminating evidence of collusion with Russia?

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

Mebbe he's a "Perfesser" of Peter Puffin' !!!

Now, that sounds more believable!

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

It is being revealed daily that The Obaminable-Clinton Corruption Team have destroyed the reputation of another institution in the country that has protected victims and effectively tracked down predators by the political corruption they built into the FBI through the politicalization of the Department of Justice .... and it's being revealed the DOJ and FBI were converted to a band of political hacks and hatchet men for the Liberals, at least in the upper ranks driving the overall philosophy of the agencies.

I've felt the FBI and DOJ were well on their way to their reputation being in the crapper for a while, Clinton and Obama just HASTENED IT..

Originally Posted by StandinStraight

You guys are pathetic, still believing conservative tabloid propaganda, turn on real news once in a while and learn something, if you were one of my students I’d flunk your sorry asses.

And what the hell do you consider real news?? CNN? MSNBC?? NBC? ABC??

Originally Posted by kehaar

The nexus of their argument is that one can only believe the NYT, CNN, and their ilk. Everything else is a lie, and one should not investigate anything else because it will pollute your mind. That is mighty convenient(and characteristically fascist).

Certainly sounds like Standin, is a typical libtard professor, indoctrinating the students he gets into the liberal cool-aid..

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by garhkal

I've felt the FBI and DOJ were well on their way to their reputation being in the crapper for a while, Clinton and Obama just HASTENED IT..

There are actually some good people in Federal law enforcement, just like other levels of LE. And the FBI does good work on the whole. When one has a "boss" who doesn't believe in the function of the department/division in which one is working then resources dry up, personnel stagnate, and supervisors neglect their responsibility to keep everyone focused on their "missions"!

The same applies to the military.

It happened during the Clinton presidency and Obaminable's.

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

There are actually some good people in Federal law enforcement, just like other levels of LE. And the FBI does good work on the whole. When one has a "boss" who doesn't believe in the function of the department/division in which one is working then resources dry up, personnel stagnate, and supervisors neglect their responsibility to keep everyone focused on their "missions"!

The same applies to the military.

It happened during the Clinton presidency and Obaminable's.

Sure there might be good folk in the rank and file, but as long as the ones above them, DOING THE DICTATING OF what laws to follow, regulations to enforce etc, are rotten to the core, the entire office will be seen as corrupt..

[Munchmasterman]

A real college professor?
Like that barleycorn bitch? The one you never call out for posting stupid statements even you can tell are bullshit?
No, it's probably best if you STFU concerning hows, whys and any other demands for specific questions concerning probing, critical thinking, analytical powers, or any other processes you don't know shit about.
I can easily provide a link to show your own knowledge and actions come nowhere close to living up to the standards you pretend to uphold.....let alone mine.

Originally Posted by lustylad

Did you read the links, Professor STANDINSHIT? Good! Now tell us exactly what you found inaccurate and why! Put your probing, critical thinking and analytical powers to work for us! That's what college professors do!

You are a college instructor, right? Are you tenured? Where do you teach? Pitt? Duquesne? Robert Morris? CMU?

Inquiring minds want to know!

Here is what I think and why I think it. And I can't wait for your piss ant response.
The 29 pages contain an interview with Lynch explaining what was discussed between her and Clinton. Also, there were concerns over the leaking of security processes and procedures and who the source was. The source was thought to be a PPD officer or a member of one of the local groups involved. The only retaliation mentioned (that I can recall) was to keep him off details in the future. There was also a speculative article about the FBI keeping people from taking pictures and concerns about what they actually discussed. Like I said, completely speculative.
In the Lynch interview, she pointed out the same team working on the Benghazi investigation, predating her time as AG, would be giving their recommendations to whatever action needed to be pursued. Lynch said she would follow those recommendations.

We know you don't believe a lot of this and that you become belligerent and pouty when people want more proof than you quoting your own opinion as fact. You seem to think we don't believe what you say when you don't show examples or links (real links, not links to statements you've made that were never vetted but often refuted).
If you think that you would be correct about at least one thing.
Since you don't have the balls to own up to your mistakes, we understand the choice of a large tittied cocksucker for an avatar.