Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
The thread is about why discussion of Ivermectin in relation to COVID is being censored. The video argues that it would be better to investigate Ivermectin as a potential defense against COVID instead of censoring and canceling all discussion of it.
I think the jury's still out on ivermectin. The Eastern Virginia Medical School protocol for treatment of COVID includes it, although it hasn't been updated since December,
A colleague of mine who had COVID a couple of months ago asked his physician about using ivermectin. The physician said he didn't believe it was wise to use it across the board for COVID patients, although he had used it with two or three people.
Apparently the data is mixed as to whether it's helpful or not, and there haven't been any large scale studies.
Anyway if you've got COVID, maybe best to talk with your doctor about this. I definitely wouldn't go down to the feed store, buy some cow ivermectin, and start taking it, without talking to a doctor
The threads not about whether people should go out and start buying up Ivermectin, or whether doctors should start prescribing it to their patients.
The thread is about why the discussion of the use of Ivermectin as a potential treatment for COVID is being censored.
The video argues that a legitimate clinical trial should be done and the effectiveness of Ivermectin in COVID treatment should be determined, instead of banning, canceling and censoring all discussion of it.
Based on YouTube's guidelines, the Eastern Virginia Medical School should be banned for their COVID treatment protocol. And your colleagues physician should also be banned.
Does that not strike anyone as a little bit odd?
Here is the policy the video is referring to: LINK
I think those policies only apply to certain people, because I've seen news outlets breaking them, but they never got banned LOL.
The threads not about whether people should go out and start buying up Ivermectin, or whether doctors should start prescribing it to their patients.
The thread is about why the discussion of the use of Ivermectin as a potential treatment for COVID is being censored.
The video argues that a legitimate clinical trial should be done and the effectiveness of Ivermectin in COVID treatment should be determined, instead of banning, canceling and censoring all discussion of it.
Based on YouTube's guidelines, the Eastern Virginia Medical School should be banned for their COVID treatment protocol.
That is exactly correct.
As I said earlier, there's at least one Indian state that is supposed to begin distributing (it may have begun) ivermectin so that should provide good data.
I'm not saying there's something there but, I guarantee you that if some Republican Senator was attached to this in any way YR and others would be on it like a duck on a june bug. But there's not so he doesn't know or care. If there was to be any corruption discovered, (and I put that at about 5% chance currently) they will happily make some baseless claim it was the previous administration's fault and call it a win.
The threads not about whether people should go out and start buying up Ivermectin, or whether doctors should start prescribing it to their patients.
The thread is about why the discussion of the use of Ivermectin as a potential treatment for COVID is being censored.
The video argues that a legitimate clinical trial should be done and the effectiveness of Ivermectin in COVID treatment should be determined, instead of banning, canceling and censoring all discussion of it.
Based on YouTube's guidelines, the Eastern Virginia Medical School should be banned for their COVID treatment protocol. And your colleagues physician should also be banned.
Does that not strike anyone as a little bit odd?
Here is the policy the video is referring to: LINK
I think those policies only apply to certain people, because I've seen news outlets breaking them, but they never got banned LOL.
I wasn't replying to your original post. I think YouTube, like eccie, should be able to do what it pleases with the platform it owns, in reason. If I owned YouTube would I censor knowledgeable medical or scientific professionals who know a lot about ivermectin? No. But it has the right to do so.
I wasn't replying to your original post. I think YouTube, like eccie, should be able to do what it pleases with the platform it owns, in reason. If I owned YouTube would I censor knowledgeable medical or scientific professionals who know a lot about ivermectin? No. But it has the right to do so.
It's fueled by politics, not science. That's why some retarded fact check by politico is one of the main authorities on Ivermectin.
