Should The US Use It’s Capabilities To Destroy Iran’s Nuclear Capability?

[Jacky S]

Originally Posted by texassapper

We have this representative body called Congress that is supposed to represent the will of the people. If Congress offers up a Declaration of War to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon which may very likely be used to kill millions of Americans and it passes...well that how you deal with the nukes. If it doesn't pass then the will of the American people is that we take that risk.

Trump is not a fucking Emperor. We have citizen soldiers not Roman legions. We have a Republic and a method to make war if necessary.

We are in these situations in the first place because Congress has failed to do its job for decades

If that’s the case, we are fucked.
I can not believe how nonchalant so many are about the idea of a bunch of religious fanatics, who are hell bent on destroying “infidels” , having nuclear weapons.
After Jerusalem or TelAviv is a smoking crater, Will history look back and say “the US could have stopped that”

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

The only thing that Trump wants to do is make a better deal than Obama.

According to Steve Bannon, that's the plan.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-tr...213807066.html

[Jacky S]

Bannon is full of shit.
Iraq was not a few months away from having nuclear weapons.

[VitaMan]

I believe Iraq stopped allowing inspections. That caused the problem.

[Unique_Carpenter]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

I believe Iraq stopped allowing inspections. That caused the problem.

Along with inspectors finding non-declared issues and Iran buying more centrifuges.

[VitaMan]

What is the problem. Trump said 60 days. Israel went ahead. Trump hasn't.

[VitaMan]

Why not go after the centrifuge manufacturers

[Jacky S]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

What is the problem. Trump said 60 days. Israel went ahead. Trump hasn't.

Did it ever occur to you that Trump is getting things in place.

Planning a strategic move such as this is no easy task.

Certainly more difficult than carrying pallets of cash over to Iran.

[VitaMan]

Trump had to rush back from the G7 meeting...for what ? To make more posts and threats on Truth Social ?

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

What is the problem. Trump said 60 days. Israel went ahead. Trump hasn't.

Trump never promised Israel support in attacking Iran. just help in defending Israel's airspace which he is. so if Trump does send the air force are you going to call him a "warmonger"? if he doesn't will you call him "weak"? you'd be wrong either way but which do you like better?


bahhahaaa

[VitaMan]

Trump had to rush back.

We are waiting

Interesting your boy Tucker is in hot water and babbling all over the place

The NSF director is in hot water.

There are many things to call Trump, not just the 2 you narrowly defined.

So you are correct in saying someone would be wrong to define him in either of the 2 choices you have given.

[Mplay]

Yes. A country since taking United States citizens as hostages has said death to America. The air space has been cleared do it.

[Brot]

Israel has demonstrated they are capable of dealing with any threat Iran poses. Sure appears it is as superficial as our boob wants to be big dick on the world stage.

[VitaMan]

They can't destroy the nuclear facility in the big mountain per news reports. Only the US has the weapons to do that.

What will Trump decide ? How will it affect his legacy...

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

Trump had to rush back.

We are waiting

Interesting your boy Tucker is in hot water and babbling all over the place

The NSF director is in hot water.

There are many things to call Trump, not just the 2 you narrowly defined.

Tucker isn't in hot water unless he's taking a shower.

bahhaaaa


which things the left call Trump do you like?

Originally Posted by Brot

Israel has demonstrated they are capable of dealing with any threat Iran poses. Sure appears it is as superficial as our boob wants to be big dick on the world stage.

except for the Fordow nuclear facility you'd be right. the military analysts state Israel don't have the type of deep bunker buster bombs the US does and that even multiple strikes by Israel probably aren't enough.


this leave the next Israeli option, a ground attack on the facility which as we all know the Israeli Air Force has complete air supremacy so it's not mission impossible.


the easy way is the US uses our bunker busters which the experts say would still need multiple strikes as the Iranians clearly designed this and possibly other facilities deep underground to resist bombing attacks in the first place.


Trump will let Israel take its shot. then see what Iran does. if they continue to be defiant and the fordow facility is still operational then he'll use the Air Force to finish it


Trump doesn't want to be the "big dick" on the world stage. He already is


BAHHAHAAA

Originally Posted by Mplay

Yes. A country since taking United States citizens as hostages has said death to America. The air space has been cleared do it.

don't forget these "Death to America!" parades they like so much in Iran


Iran is a "mostly peaceful" nation


BAHHAHHAA