a take on incomplete reviews

[clearlylost]

Originally Posted by Loki Pk

And <0 ...I don't 'hate' you...just think you could write a better review. is it wrong to have standards?

Peace
PK

Its a good thing I didn't ask you before I posted it then.

[clearlylost]

=rooster;1052099581
As far as the amount of "detail" that should be in the review.... there is a lot of variation allowed. It is a judgment call by the Mods, but we do try to ensure minimum standards. But we will never please everyone.

Thanks rooster. I wasn't bothered by the PA, but its definitely a good review for the experience and valid. I'll just post additional reviews or just pay. Not a problem (for all the pee wee hermans).

[offshoredrilling]

Originally Posted by JohnnyCap

Randy, chill and hear OSD: penthouse letters style reviews suck. They are more fun if you read them like this:

'my thick cock' think pencil, like one that's been on a golf cart in the rain and sun for three seasons

'after 20 minutes of mish', think he fucked long enough for the clock to change once. Or he blew early and then talked for 20 minutes to get the time paid for.

'She had a great big O,' think either Meryl Streep walked in for a cameo and/or she peed in his mouth a little to fake a squirt.

And probably when someone needs to list 2-3 different kisses, 6-8 different positions and the fact that he touched nipples, that person either has just been with his second woman, he goes soft easy, or he couldn't get it in and had to try another angle.

These pages are filled with huge egos that if they were half what they thought they'd be getting paid rather than paying. I'm sure I do it too.

Share enough to get your time. Safety, cost, cover, and maybe a brief summary of service. MODs aren't hard on this.

errr, ok, which provider I see you been talkin to. errrr bitch LOL

yet in fact I like this post