On the subject of identifying someone as having some specific medical condition...... How would/should the following be handled.

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by Whispers

...

There is not clearing house set up that we can use to check out prospective dates in the civy world.

...

Nope. But to give an accurate assessment all partners should be known. Not specific identity. Somebody off board could have been the last partner and where source came from. That would leave community members in the clear. But would still give a detailed account of prior people.

Originally Posted by Whispers

...


This board DOES exist as an information exchange about providers though.

Agreed.

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by Precious_b

Nope. But to give an accurate assessment all partners should be known. Not specific identity.

Although it matters where he got it You are missing the point.

It matters who he was with that he may have exposed to it.

Naming those people is an alert to them as well as others.

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by Whispers

Although it matters where he got it You are missing the point.

It matters who he was with that he may have exposed to it.

Naming those people is an alert to them as well as others.

Originally Posted by Precious_b

Nope. But to give an accurate assessment all partners should be known. Not specific identity. Somebody off board could have been the last partner and where source came from. That would leave community members in the clear. But would still give a detailed account of prior people.

Either i'm really bad at conveying a thought or you like taking me out of context.

I'll assume the former

[boredinsatx]

Originally Posted by Whispers

if a member came forward

and publicly stated he/she had been diagnosed with DiseaseOfTheDayXYZ

and then listed all those member's of the community that he/she had contact with......

Nothing more than that.....

Exactly what they might ask for at any health clinic......

Could the thread and all the names stand?

SHOULD the thread and all the names stand?

How serious are you about believing in the information being available to make this all safer for everyone?

In a perfect world, what you are proposing would be a great idea....unfortunately this is not the world we live in. We already have too much speculation, rumors people heard from a friend's neighbor's sister's cousin....add that to people who just make shit up out of jealousy or revenge....and you have too much uncertainty to be publicly posting potentially false information, that even if proven to be false, will still damage a persons reputation permanently.

Ideally, what we should have, is a system like they have in Nevada, where all (legal) providers are required to be STD tested every thirty days. Perhaps as a condition of membership here or on P411...but I doubt the owners of these sites would like to handle the logistical nightmare that would be.

[a10bomb]

Originally Posted by boredinsatx

and you have too much uncertainty to be publicly posting potentially false information, that even if proven to be false, will still damage a persons reputation permanently.

Completely agree did we not learn anything from the whole GFX debacle!!!

Ideally, what we should have, is a system like they have in Nevada, where all (legal) providers are required to be STD tested every thirty days. Perhaps as a condition of membership here or on P411...but I doubt the owners of these sites would like to handle the logistical nightmare that would be.

Nor do they probably want the attention that it would bring