Recorded Sessions?

[Wakeup]

Originally Posted by WTF

When I'm communicating with a fucking retard, you are correct it is not the ignorant ass retards problem. It is mine for thinking you could think these things logical out.

And mine for thinking you could make a logical post...

BTW, I find it amazingly funny that tcp ACTUALLY believes that he got a shot that makes him immune to STDs and HIV... Nevermind that's impossible, just focus on the fact that he honestly believes it to be true...

[cr76]

i wouldn't call it a money and power,

I'd call it a big 'ol pile of Bullshit. can smell it all the way to Timbuk 2.

Only guy in Houston who can't get HIV or STDs. Right here on Eccie.

[the cute papi]

I'm Not the only one. You don't call something bullshit if you're not smart enough to open your eyes and look for it yourself. You want others(me) to do the work for you. It doesn't work like that. Save yourself.

[Camille Fox]

Originally Posted by Wakeup

And mine for thinking you could make a logical post...

BTW, I find it amazingly funny that tcp ACTUALLY believes that he got a shot that makes him immune to STDs and HIV... Nevermind that's impossible, just focus on the fact that he honestly believes it to be true...

And let's not forget: A shot... Not multiple different shots... A SINGLE shot for all bacterial and virul STDs out there. Genius.

[Wakeup]

I though his kind of self-delusion was only reserved for religions...he honestly believes he's immune..it's amazing to witness this kind of psychological stuff at play in public.

[cr76]

Originally Posted by the cute papi

I'm Not the only one. You don't call something bullshit if you're not smart enough to open your eyes and look for it yourself. You want others(me) to do the work for you. It doesn't work like that. Save yourself.

Originally Posted by Wakeup

And mine for thinking you could make a logical post...

BTW, I find it amazingly funny that tcp ACTUALLY believes that he got a shot that makes him immune to STDs and HIV... Nevermind that's impossible, just focus on the fact that he honestly believes it to be true...

Originally Posted by Camille Fox

And let's not forget: A shot... Not multiple different shots... A SINGLE shot for all bacterial and virul STDs out there. Genius.

I guess we are all stupid, because we haven't found this "miracle shot" along with the rest of the world.

Originally Posted by the cute papi

If you're willing to pay more than 250 for sex you're stupid, no wonder you are a nobody

I rather been known on Eccie as a gentleman who pays well

Rather then a guy
Who requests BBFS service, Chases off newbies, and secretly records escort sessions with out the girls knowing.

[Guest021217]

Originally Posted by WTF

Actually you need to read up....in the state of Texas you can record a private conversation as long as you have the consent of one of the parties involved.

What you posted does not involve one of the parties involved consent.

Think about what i have posted before replying. You can record a phone conversation if you want...you just have to have the consent of one of the parties involved. Now go eat a bugger and quit bothering me.

That article doesn't have to do with a phone conversation it has to do with being in a private place that intimate encounters takes place which is illegal to record if both parties are not aware of it..

[Guest021217]

QUOTE=Pistolero;1057399626]LMFAO

Had to quote DM on this.

Sweetie, you need to read the relevant parts of the law. This is the correct page for your website above.

http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/texas-recording-law
[/QUOTE]




http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/gath...te-information

You obviously can't read either

Sweetie you need to read that article I posted yours has to do with wiretapping which is irrelevant to this matter.. My link is revalent to this subject..

Mr.Mod Pants isn't as smart as he thunks did you even really read my link or did you just want to be the internet badass and attack me with information you have absolutely no knowledge of ?

[the cute papi]

I don't chase them off nor do I request bbfs. We've fuckin been through this several times. Look at all the newbies I've seen, most of them are still here and popular among hobbiests. The ones that quit, quit a year + after seeing me. Someone else is driving away the new girls. Not me

[Don T. Lukbak]

Papi's retrovirus resistance is reminiscent of Simbas' dawa induced resistance to bullets in Congo, '64. Needless to say, they got mowed down.

The funniest part of this was, in his role as "advisor", Che Guevara concluded HE was immune to bullets because every last Simba around him got cut down. He never learned this was because Tschombe's CIA operators ordered him to spare El Che...he was too useful an idiot to waste. Alas, those Bolivian militiamen never got the memo.

Guevara recorded a lot of his wet work. Hmmmm. Or at least he had it recorded, for greater glory.

[Guest021217]

Originally Posted by the cute papi

I'm Not the only one. You don't call something bullshit if you're not smart enough to open your eyes and look for it yourself. You want others(me) to do the work for you. It doesn't work like that. Save yourself.

But you didn't find it your parents did so now what is your comeback?

Your parents did the work for you so get off your high horse..

[Pistolero]

Originally Posted by Pistolero

LMFAO

Had to quote DM on this.

Sweetie, you need to read the relevant parts of the law. This is the correct page for your website above.

http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/texas-recording-law

Originally Posted by Dorthy_Monroe

QUOTE=Pistolero;1057399626]LMFAO

Had to quote DM on this.

Sweetie, you need to read the relevant parts of the law. This is the correct page for your website above.

http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/texas-recording-law

http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/gath...te-information

You obviously can't read either

Sweetie you need to read that article I posted yours has to do with wiretapping which is irrelevant to this matter.. My link is revalent to this subject..

Mr.Mod Pants isn't as smart as he thunks did you even really read my link or did you just want to be the internet badass and attack me with information you have absolutely no knowledge of ?

I know it was easier for you to just read the title, with those big letters. But, if you read the first paragraph you would understand . Tell ya what, I will highlight the relevant parts.

Texas makes it a crime to intercept or record any "wire, oral, or electronic communication" unless one party to the conversation consents. Texas Penal Code § 16.02. Therefore, if you operate in Texas, you may record a conversation or phone call if you are a party to the conversation or you get permission from one party to the conversation in advance

[Guest021217]

Originally Posted by Pistolero

I know it was easier for you to just read the title, with those big letters. But, if you read the first paragraph you would understand . Tell ya what, I will highlight the relevant parts.

Texas makes it a crime to intercept or record any "wire, oral, or electronic communication" unless one party to the conversation consents. Texas Penal Code § 16.02. Therefore, if you operate in Texas, you may record a conversation or phone call if you are a party to the conversation or you get permission from one party to the conversation in advance

But if its in fucking private and intimate activities are happening then its fucking illegal are you not fucking reading the shit


Its called INTRUSION UPON SECLUSION

[Guest021217]

Gathering Private Information

If you physically enter a private area, photograph or take video of people engaged in private activities in places where they reasonably expect to be private, or in some other other way intrude into a person's privacy (by, for example, opening the person's mail), you could be liable for a violation of what is called "intrusion*upon seclusion." If you collect certain personal data, this can also intrude into a person's private affairs. In the newsgathering context, the actual collection of the data could be seen as intrusion if the method you use meets the*four general elements for an intrusion claim.

Generally speaking, however, you will not be liable for intrusion if you photograph or capture video of people in public places, even if they have not consented to being recorded, because individuals cannot have a reasonable expectation of privacy when in public. Nor will you be liable for intrusion if you gather private information from documents that are available to the general public.

If you plan to gather private information or take photographs or video of people engaged in private activities in places where they could reasonably expect to be private, you should:

[Guest021217]

Therefore, you may be able to record in-person conversations occurring in a public place, such as a street or a restaurant, without consent.

Grrrr like seriously you just don't get it

There not in public so its illegal