Rude comments and hijacking threads

[junglemonkey]

Originally Posted by ChloeClark

I'm pretty sure they are called "Trolls" because they don't post, much less start threads...



2 words... "COCONUT OIL"... that is one dry puss...

You are incorrect. The whores know who they are.

[chicagoboy]

Originally Posted by Pistolero

By posting that pic is the poster looking to get people to discuss it rather than the topic?

Not I. Please refer to my post immediately preceding your own:

Originally Posted by chicagoboy

Please, commenting on the particular pussy is not 'on-topic'.

I'm thincking every thread in Houston Coed should include "taint" in its title. For example, "Rude comments, hijacking threads and taint".

[N.M.]

Originally Posted by Pistolero

In light of some comments in threads and RTM received I thought I might clear some things up a little.

First off, this is not church. This is not a social meeting situation. Comments that are made which could get you thrown out of a social situation may not even lift the eyebrow on a mod looking at guideline violations. This is a hooker board.

If we moderated like some people seem to want us to, we could just lock every thread when we saw it and point every post. Including the OP. That seems to be what some people want. This is not in response to any one person and their constant RTM on rude post. There are more than one. And looking at where RTM such as these come from, Houston has a lot of babies. And those babies need to learn that this is a hooker board, not church.

Funny how people make a comment designed to elicit a response and then when that response comes, they come crying to the mods with A RTM about how rude the responder was to them. Buck it up. This is a hooker board, not church.

Now to hijacks. Every comment that does not directly correspond to the original post is not a hijack. It is an off topic post. I know many do not understand that there is a difference. A hijack is a post that, in the mods opinion, is designed to start or continue discussion in a different direction. Most of the time these come in the form of personal attacks. And while on that subject, attacking some one for several sentences and then adding a line like : And to keep on topic, Yes I do like lemonade" is a hijack. If the post as a total entity looks to change the intent of the thread, it is a hijack.

To sum it up, rude comments do not always violate the guidelines. This is a hooker board, not church. And deliberate intentions to change thread direction is a hijack, not necessarily an off topic post. And if these either happen in the course of personal attack, the bar is lower.

I will say that these are my interpretations of how the guidelines are to be enforced. I have not discussed this post with other staff and they may look at things a little different. SO do not try to use this post as justification to escape enforcement. The guidelines rule.

Boo fucking hoo.

All this whining on "whiny people and cry babies" from the guy who couldn't handle a little back and forth from Girlieman and I.....

[GlobeSpotter]

Originally Posted by Pistolero

A hijack is a post that, in the mods opinion, is designed to start or continue discussion in a different direction. Most of the time these come in the form of personal attacks.
.....

When an op changes the direction of a thread, followers of the direction change should not be pointed. That's lame at best.

Pointing for thread hijacking is really indicative of lousy moderating.

And, honestly, who really gives a shit if the thread meanders. Its a fucking whore board for Tebow's sake.

Originally Posted by Pistolero

.....

I will say that these are my interpretations of how the guidelines are to be enforced. I have not discussed this post with other staff and they may look at things a little different.

Other staff members will have different interpretations based on which whore's pocket he resides.

[Guest092816]

Preach

Originally Posted by Pistolero

In light of some comments in threads and RTM received I thought I might clear some things up a little.

First off, this is not church. This is not a social meeting situation. Comments that are made which could get you thrown out of a social situation may not even lift the eyebrow on a mod looking at guideline violations. This is a hooker board.

If we moderated like some people seem to want us to, we could just lock every thread when we saw it and point every post. Including the OP. That seems to be what some people want. This is not in response to any one person and their constant RTM on rude post. There are more than one. And looking at where RTM such as these come from, Houston has a lot of babies. And those babies need to learn that this is a hooker board, not church.

Funny how people make a comment designed to elicit a response and then when that response comes, they come crying to the mods with A RTM about how rude the responder was to them. Buck it up. This is a hooker board, not church.

Now to hijacks. Every comment that does not directly correspond to the original post is not a hijack. It is an off topic post. I know many do not understand that there is a difference. A hijack is a post that, in the mods opinion, is designed to start or continue discussion in a different direction. Most of the time these come in the form of personal attacks. And while on that subject, attacking some one for several sentences and then adding a line like : And to keep on topic, Yes I do like lemonade" is a hijack. If the post as a total entity looks to change the intent of the thread, it is a hijack.

To sum it up, rude comments do not always violate the guidelines. This is a hooker board, not church. And deliberate intentions to change thread direction is a hijack, not necessarily an off topic post. And if these either happen in the course of personal attack, the bar is lower.

I will say that these are my interpretations of how the guidelines are to be enforced. I have not discussed this post with other staff and they may look at things a little different. SO do not try to use this post as justification to escape enforcement. The guidelines rule.

[GlobeSpotter]

bump....for wider distribution

[Mexxxican Warrior]

Fuck Joel Osteen!

[Guest020719]

Originally Posted by Pistolero

Now to hijacks. Every comment that does not directly correspond to the original post is not a hijack. It is an off topic post. I know many do not understand that there is a difference. A hijack is a post that, in the mods opinion, is designed to start or continue discussion in a different direction. Most of the time these come in the form of personal attacks. And while on that subject, attacking some one for several sentences and then adding a line like : And to keep on topic, Yes I do like lemonade" is a hijack. If the post as a total entity looks to change the intent of the thread, it is a hijack.

[CRY]What a bunch of hypocritical tripe. This guy unilaterally pointed me for an alleged hijack which was complete crap and then later posts his own "hijack" in a different thread.

There should be a distinction between a moderator's reading comprehension level and what a real hyjack is.


You owe me a refund Pistolero.[/CRY]

[pyramider]

Originally Posted by chicagoboy

I'm thincking every thread in Houston Coed should include "taint" in its title. For example, "Rude comments, hijacking threads and taint".

Now we are talking!! WTF? No one let me know about cb's (not to be confused with CB, CD, CDB, or HV's BBC) brilliant idea.

[Hot to Trot Daphne]

eat me..




this thread smacks of hypocrisy and dare I say, BOOSHIT. I can supply Exhibit A if need be.

[pyramider]

Exhibit T is the taint, all other exhibits are nonsense.

[gtoman]

Originally Posted by Pistolero

In light of some comments in threads and RTM received I thought I might clear some things up a little.

First off, this is not church. This is not a social meeting situation. Comments that are made which could get you thrown out of a social situation may not even lift the eyebrow on a mod looking at guideline violations. This is a hooker board.

If we moderated like some people seem to want us to, we could just lock every thread when we saw it and point every post. Including the OP. That seems to be what some people want. This is not in response to any one person and their constant RTM on rude post. There are more than one. And looking at where RTM such as these come from, Houston has a lot of babies. And those babies need to learn that this is a hooker board, not church.

Funny how people make a comment designed to elicit a response and then when that response comes, they come crying to the mods with A RTM about how rude the responder was to them. Buck it up. This is a hooker board, not church.

Now to hijacks. Every comment that does not directly correspond to the original post is not a hijack. It is an off topic post. I know many do not understand that there is a difference. A hijack is a post that, in the mods opinion, is designed to start or continue discussion in a different direction. Most of the time these come in the form of personal attacks. And while on that subject, attacking some one for several sentences and then adding a line like : And to keep on topic, Yes I do like lemonade" is a hijack. If the post as a total entity looks to change the intent of the thread, it is a hijack.

To sum it up, rude comments do not always violate the guidelines. This is a hooker board, not church. And deliberate intentions to change thread direction is a hijack, not necessarily an off topic post. And if these either happen in the course of personal attack, the bar is lower.

I will say that these are my interpretations of how the guidelines are to be enforced. I have not discussed this post with other staff and they may look at things a little different. SO do not try to use this post as justification to escape enforcement. The guidelines rule.

Might as well say that mods don't take action against the free pussy they get when its reported otherwise a certain someone or two would have been launched ages ago for hijacking and overly rude comments.

[Guest062217]

People use the RTM? seriously?

[Brooke Wilde]

Originally Posted by Hot to Trot Daphne

eat me..

Much better then the red head. This thread has redeemed itself.

[gtoman]

Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

When an op changes the direction of a thread, followers of the direction change should not be pointed. That's lame at best.

Pointing for thread hijacking is really indicative of lousy moderating.

And, honestly, who really gives a shit if the thread meanders. Its a fucking whore board for Tebow's sake.


Other staff members will have different interpretations based on which whore's pocket he resides.

They point us for "hijacking" our own threads, they point is for hijacking someone else's threads....isn't hijacking subjective? If the OP is involved and contributes is it hijacking?

Hijacking = points
Rude comments = don't waste mods time

Lol. What a ridiculous load of BS. Why don't you just face it. Mods don't follow the rules or invoke the rules unless it suits them.