Guys- How Many of You Dont Hobby but Still Get on The Board? What Are You Doing on The Board?

[rrousseau]

Originally Posted by amoryb

Wow, writing something that isn't true is pretty much the definition of false. False means lying. Look it up.

Also, lurkers generally can't see pics posted in reviews. That is, unless they've paid for premium access. But then they wouldn't be leeches, would they?

You really need to take a step back and review your little theories, Rod. They don't hold up to even casual scrutiny.

True, I can't see ROS because I'm not on premium. So not much in the way of "spank" material.

But if Rod wants to squander his sterling reputation just to get back at a newbie who bruised his overblown ego, that's his own personal choice.

[rockerrick]

My reputation hahahahaha you really are bucking for village idiot now

Did you forget the organize reviewers?

[amoryb]

Physical descriptions? Really? That's what you came up with?

By all means, keep posting. You being clever is just adorable.

[rockerrick]

Wanna fuck over lurkers, hit them where they leech.
And you like your butt buddy forgot the organize reviewers part.

[rrousseau]

Originally Posted by amoryb

Physical descriptions? Really? That's what you came up with?

By all means, keep posting. You being clever is just adorable.

Oh, yeah, I spank the monkey constantly while reading those physical descriptions.

Where's the emoticon for sarcasm?

[rockerrick]

Why do you fags keep thinking about spanking your monkey's?
Well except Stevie petting his kitty.

[rrousseau]

Originally Posted by rockerrick

Why do you fags keep thinking about spanking your monkey's?
Well except Stevie petting his kitty.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here. Rod isn't really a musician, is he? At least not a successful one. Homophobia doesn't play well in that venue.

[Windinhishair]

Coed is for entertainment and the Review forum is for reviews.

To claim that one doesn't have equal rights to banter or lurk in Coed simply because they don't post reviews is basically displaying a complete lack of intellect and reasoning ability.

Those who entertain and offer insightful rather than inflammatory perspective contribute far more to coed than those who simply dog pile other mongers and providers and pat each other on the back afterward.

I've never once read a post in Coed and thought "Oh that made more sense because this person has a lot of reviews" or "That wasn't as funny because this person has no reviews posted".

Just because Coed is used as a hangout for the Little Rascals gang to dog pile others doesn't make it a designated area just for them. Review count has zilch to do with Coed.

I've seen far more entertaining posts from Douchehurst who has no reviews than I ever have from RR.
From what I can tell RR has the reasoning ability and insight of a fencepost contributing nothing but unprovoked insults, hostility and immaturity to Coed yet somehow feels having some reviews makes him a better contributor. Think again.

Coed = Entertainment and insightful topics. Review forum = Reviews. Apples and oranges.

[amoryb]

I have no idea what the significance of the "organize reviewers part" is. Please explain.

[amoryb]

On second thought, you're just embarassing yourself Rod. Call it a night.

[rrousseau]

Originally Posted by Windinhishair

Coed is for entertainment and the Review forum is for reviews.

To claim that one doesn't have equal rights to banter or lurk in Coed simply because they don't post reviews is basically displaying a complete lack of intellect and reasoning ability.

Those who entertain and offer insightful rather than inflammatory perspective contribute far more to coed than those who simply dog pile other mongers and providers and pat each other on the back afterward.

I've never once read a post in Coed and thought "Oh that made more sense because this person has a lot of reviews" or "That wasn't funny because this person has no reviews posted".

Just because Coed is used as a hangout for the Little Rascals gang to dog pile others doesn't make it a designated area just for them. Review count has zilch to do with Coed.

I've seen far more entertaining posts from Douchehurst who has no reviews than I ever have from RR. From what I can tell RR has the reasoning ability and insight of a fencepost contributing nothing but unprovoked insults, hostility and immaturity to Coed yet somehow feels having some reviews makes him a better contributor. Think again.

Coed = Entertainment and insightful topics. Review forum = Reviews. Apples and oranges.

Wows, that is a really well thought out and well-written post. Kudos, Windinhishair.

[rockerrick]

Really codybeast? DO was someone before your knowledge of him.
What about you codybeast? What's your review history?
What is it you think you contribute?
Most people on here will tell you not a god damn thing!
Who cares what you have to say?
Maybe your new little butt buddies?

[rockerrick]

Originally Posted by amoryb

I have no idea what the significance of the "organize reviewers part" is. Please explain.

The plan was to organize reviewers tired of leeching lurkers, to write their reviews in a way that waste their money.
Forgot that in a couple hours huh?
Guess that's why you fuckers are vying for co village idiots.

[rockerrick]

Originally Posted by rrousseau

Wows, that is a really well thought out and well-written post. Kudos, Windinhishair.

What about his congratulatory blow job?

[rrousseau]

Originally Posted by rockerrick

Really codybeast? DO was someone before your knowledge of him.
What about you codybeast? What's your review history?
What is it you think you contribute?
Most people on here will tell you not a god damn thing!
Who cares what you have to say?
Maybe your new little butt buddies?

Wow, this cat is really obsessed with homoerotic themes - n'est-ce pas?