Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Don't you ever get tired of having your ass handed to you? Keep flailing. You look like Drumpf making fun of the disabled...
STRIKE TWO!
There was no other mention of the video you're talking about in this thread. The only mention of a video came from Jackie and it had nothing to do with Trump. In fact no one even mentioned trumps name except you. I thought at first you had accidentally posted your remark in the wrong thread until I saw your name next to it.
When you post...try having a point. It makes it so much more interesting to the reader.
There was no other mention of the video you're talking about in this thread. The only mention of a video came from Jackie and it had nothing to do with Trump. In fact no one even mentioned trumps name except you. I thought at first you had accidentally posted your remark in the wrong thread until I saw your name next to it.
When you post...try having a point. It makes it so much more interesting to the reader.
Whether or not there was a video, Obama sent $400 million to Iran in cash, small unmarked bills, to Iran as a ransom for hostages which Obama claims is a partial payment to Iran on a debt we don't even owe.
Whether or not there was a video, Obama sent $400 million to Iran in cash, small unmarked bills, to Iran as a ransom for hostages which Obama claims is a partial payment to Iran on a debt we don't even owe.
And at least one of the kidnap victims is reporting they had to wait until the money got there!!!!
Sounds like a car dealership to me! No money. No keys!
While you guys stew in your own juices, Drumpf has admitted he didn't see the video he twice said he did. In fact, he admitted the video he saw was of something else.
Every poster meant it as an illegal act. And I will admit your legal expertise is equal to your expertise on most other subjects. Zero.
You say it's illegal to do business with Iran? Scope? Field? Link?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn;[FONT=Arial
7665410584[/FONT]]No this was money laundering despite the legal expertise of Munchkin. Sometimes money laundering does hide the source of the money but sometimes money laundering just make the money "clean". It is illegal to do business with Iran with US dollars so you have to get rid of those dollars and money is fungible. The earlier money we sent to the Iranians can be tracked through the Internet (so why didn't we do that this time?) but this cash can be divided into neat bundles literally and Everyone knows if it's not neatly bundled the terrorists can't spend it.given to terrorists for operations in England, France, Germany, Israel, Belgium, and the US. It probably was. So now, Obama is sponsoring terrorism against our allies. Again, why an unmarked plane? Reagan released obsolete parts to the Iranians in exchange for money and hostages. The money went to the Contras (since the unconstitutional Boland bill would not allow Reagan to do foreign policy) and we got hostages back. Reagan admitted as much. This time Obama went further, we didn't give Iran obsolete weapons, we gave them money to be used for buying new weapons and paying for operations in Europe. It was against the law and Congress had no chance to approve or disapprove (ala the Boland Bill).
So if this was so up and up, why the secrecy? I watched Josh Ernest the other day. He must have said the word "ransom" 12 times in two minutes as he denied that it was ransom. Shakespeare had him pegged.
You go from "It probably was." to Obama sponsoring terrorism against our allies to sliding up America's ass with a version or Iran-Contra so laundered any American would have been proud to be a part of it.
