Illegals in caravan SUE US government??!

[Austin Ellen]

- And let's wait for liberal heads to explode. Shouldn't be long now.

[Austin Ellen]

-

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

-

There wasn't "an issue" before Trump was elected.

Now they don't even like "grabbing some pussy"!

[friendly fred]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

This is utterly and unabashed hate speech, right out of the Richard Spencer / Alex Jones / Steve Bannon / Donald Trump school.

You are hysterically advocating a pre-emptive military strike on political refugees on foot nearly a thousand miles from our border.

Your poisonous rhetoric reminds us what we see on the internet before someone goes bonkers and starts shooting up churches, nightclubs and synagogues. Or, the kind of language that he FBI discovers on the internet after the fact.

Likening this to 9/11 is Trumpian hyperbole and more dog whistles before Election Day. (I don’t think there are any undecid3d voters here, so what’s your point?)

Please stop it. Your hate language could be putting our community at risk.

Once the illegals gets here from the caravan, they need to be checked to make sure they are not economic refugees, or worse.

Why don't you lead a march of liberals into Guatemala to even the score.

When you people win the House, are you going to make any words you don't like into illegal hate speech, punishable by imprisonment, like in England?

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

There wasn't "an issue" before Trump was elected.

Now they don't even like "grabbing some pussy"!

Ask Ellen how welcoming she would be if strangers just came up and grabbed her by the pussy.

[rexdutchman]

WHAT FUCKING RIGHTS? They are not US Citizens, NOR are they in this country?!?
SO How on gods green earth, do they have a leg to stand on to sue?! Its bizarre world dogs and cats living together
However just another stunt

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by friendly fred

When you people win the House, are you going to make any words you don't like into illegal hate speech, punishable by imprisonment, like in England?

I'll answer that: "NO!"

That would activate the requirements of due process, including a right to counsel and jury trial. The Senate would need to approve the modification of the Federal Rules to accommodate their SocialisticTotalitarianism aka The United States of America Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by rexdutchman

WHAT FUCKING RIGHTS? They are not US Citizens, NOR are they in this country?!?
SO How on gods green earth, do they have a leg to stand on to sue?! Its bizarre world dogs and cats living together
However just another stunt

Read the thread, Rex.

Once they’re arrested, they have right to due process.

Period.

No amount of hysterical screaming and stomping your feet will change the law.

The “marauders” threatening our fragile border now have no right to due process in the country until they are in this country.

Until then, they are just pawns in Trump’s hate games.

Seems like you’ve bought into it.

Do you advocate a pre-emptive military strike against Mexico as some in this forum have suggested?

[rexdutchman]

I understand that BUT they aren't here and have not been arrested , so my last line says its a Stunt to fire people up
Most could make and argument that invading a country can be an act of war , The US is part of NATO and we secure other counties borders but your against securing our border

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

The United States of America Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei.

you need to work on that translation if you're going to use america in that awkward sentence.


I think this is what you mean. lol!



Nationalsozialistische Amerikanische Arbeiterpartei

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by rexdutchman

I understand that BUT they aren't here and have not been arrested , so my last line says its a Stunt to fire people up
Most could make and argument that invading a country can be an act of war , The US is part of NATO and we secure other counties borders but your against securing our border

We agree that this entire caravan thing is an Election stunt. The “stunt” apparently had you and others in this forum real fired up.

We also agree that invading Mexico to wipe out these “marauders,” as some in this forum have called them, would be considered an act of war. I’d take it further than that.

But I am not against securing our border. Quit lying about that.

And what does NATO have to do with Mexico and Central America?

Yow!

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

I'll answer that: "NO!"

That would activate the requirements of due process, including a right to counsel and jury trial. The Senate would need to approve the modification of the Federal Rules to accommodate their SocialisticTotalitarianism aka The United States of America Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei.

Hysterical and off topic, LL. I wish you’d stop the frothy alt-right hate speech. A casual observer might think you actually believe it

However, you haven’t yet answered my question regarding your suggestion that we had a right to invade Mexico and attack the asylum seekers.

This is the precisely the kind of talk that drove record numbers of minorities, young voters, first time voters and womento the polls for EV.

In the last weeks of the campaign, Trump decided to hang his hat on cruelty and inhumanity.

I believe he miscalculated the number of decent people in this country.

We’ll see that tomorrow.

[Austin Ellen]

It might come to that. In the meantime--Trump grabbed my vote and I let him!

Originally Posted by WTF

Ask Ellen how welcoming she would be if strangers just came up and grabbed her by the pussy.

[Yssup Rider]

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by friendly fred

That would be according to the 1951 Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees to seek the "first safe country". I believe Mexico is the first safe country and as such should grant them asylum.

Besides, the US is full of racists and homophobes and is not safe, anyway.

We are a bunch of fucking assholes here in the US. Why would anyone want to come to this shithole?

The hysterical sarcasm aside, please prove that’s a requirement.

This seems to indicate otherwise.

https://www.amnesty.org.uk/truth-about-refugees

You “believe” Mexico is the first safe country? Then why do you believe we need a wall?

Talking circles, amigo.