Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

I B Hankering · 06-12-2019, 09:35 AM

gnadfly · 06-12-2019, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bambino

Hey Jax, I guess you missed Pelosi’s presser today. She said there’s not enough Democrat votes to impeach Trump. Guess why? They don’t have evidence of a crime. Neither did Mueller.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Sure you will, but are you prepared for the truth. If that fat lying bastard is innocent so was OJ Simpson.

Did you ever present any evidence of a crime that held up to any scrutiny? You kept saying "Read Vol II" but never presented any specific solid evidence.

It appears that Nancy needs a few more fishing trips to find evidence. And if she doesn't, Lawfare has arranged that not giving evidence by way of executive privilege is the new crime.

oeb11 · 06-12-2019, 11:06 AM

The DPST's are playing a propaganda game against Trump - hoping enough Lies and slander will rub off on voters for 2020.

The Schiff and Nadler Act of holding "evidence" - never revealed - in their hands is an example of the propaganda Lies.
Pelosi knows they have not enough votes to Impeach trump in the house, much less convict in the Senate. She does not want the disaster to the DPST's that a Senate Trial would become for them - exposing the machinations, and indeed DPST collusion in the party and with the MSM to get Trump - simply because he defeated their DPST Goddess in 2016. I would remind all that Tlaib - upon her election - and before being sworn in as a Representative - Loudly announced -"We going to Impeach the MFer. "

Impeachment is a political action - The DPST House majority needs no more reason than Trump is breathing to Impeach him and send a case to Senate Trial.
Pelosi is smart enough to know the consequences for 2020 of a failed Senate Trial. hence the Lies, propaganda, and delaying, and obfuscation of the House DPST's.

It is all a political smoke screen for trying to deny Trump re-election - something they are very afraid of.

Pelosi- her age is clearly catching up with her - I do not see her as Speaker, and perhaps not even in the House of Representatives in 2020 after elections. I think the new radicals of the DPST party will force themselves into leadership over the old, white, folks in leadership presently. Then we will see the Socialist Rhetoric in full bloom!!!

Jaxson66 · 06-12-2019, 01:10 PM

[QUOTE=gnadfly;1061548045]Did you ever present any evidence of a crime that held up to any scrutiny? You kept saying "Read Vol II" but never presented any specific solid evidence./QUOTE]

How the fuck am I supposed to present evidence? You think I have files of documents that support the Mueller report? Those underlying evidence files are being obstructed by the fat lying bastards trump and Barr.

I doubt you or any trump worshiper in this thread has read a single page of either volume. You only know what you’re told by your carnival barkers.

I B Hankering · 06-12-2019, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

How the fuck am I supposed to present evidence? You think I have files of documents that support the Mueller report? Those underlying evidence files are being obstructed by the fat lying bastards trump and Barr.

I doubt you or any trump worshiper in this thread has read a single page of either volume. You only know what you’re told by your carnival barkers.

But that pencil-neck dim-retard, Adam Schitty, said two years ago that he had all of the evidence that was needed to put Trump in jail. Don't you believe him anymore?

Jaxson66 · 06-12-2019, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

But that pencil-neck dim-retard, Adam Schitty, said two years ago that he had all of the evidence that was needed to put Trump in jail. Don't you believe him anymore?

What the fuck makes you think I believed him in the first place. You got a bad habit of tagging anyone who doesn’t support your messiah a libtard, or this or that. This forum is about the mueller report which I doubt you or any of your rat pack has read. All you post is deep state bullshit Or some ignorant meme.

bambino · 06-12-2019, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

What the fuck makes you think I believed him in the first place. You got a bad habit of tagging anyone who doesn’t support your messiah a libtard, or this or that. This forum is about the mueller report which I doubt you or any of your rat pack has read. All you post is deep state bullshit Or some ignorant meme.

The thread is about the Mueller report. Not the forum.

I B Hankering · 06-12-2019, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

What the fuck makes you think I believed him in the first place. You got a bad habit of tagging anyone who doesn’t support your messiah a libtard, or this or that. This forum is about the mueller report which I doubt you or any of your rat pack has read. All you post is deep state bullshit Or some ignorant meme.

Because you've been regurgitating Schitty's mantra for days now. It's obvious you are still swallowing Schitty, et al's, Kool-aid.

And unlike you, I read and can comprehend the meaning in Mueller's summary: “… the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference” and “... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime...”

Horowitz and John H. Durham are about to hurt the feelings of the dim-retards. Those two men are going to take hildebeest's bought and paid for "RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA!" mantra and shove it "deeply" up Schitty's, Nadler's, Cumming's, Water's, Pelosi's, Odumbo's, hildbeest's, etc., collective ass.

Jaxson66 · 06-12-2019, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Because you've been regurgitating Schitty's mantra for days now. It's obvious you are still swallowing Schitty, et al's, Kool-aid.

And unlike you, I read and can comprehend the meaning in Mueller's summary: “… the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference” and “... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime...”

Horowitz and John H. Durham are about to hurt the feelings of the dim-retards. Those two men are going to take hildebeest's bought and paid for "RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA!" mantra and shove it "deeply" up Schitty's, Nadler's, Cumming's, Water's, Pelosi's, Odumbo's, hildbeest's, etc., collective ass.

Yeah sure, handjob Hannity is feeding that shit sandwich to his minions every day. Today he’s claiming Flynn will be changing his plea. I often ask myself how fucking stupid do you have to be to believe that bullshit. Then you actually meet those people and realize why they eat that shit.

Jaxson66 · 06-12-2019, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bambino

The thread is about the Mueller report. Not the forum.

Take a couple of atta boys from the rat pack kitty professor.

bambino · 06-12-2019, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Take a couple of atta boys from the rat pack kitty professor.

Just correcting one of your many mistakes.

I B Hankering · 06-12-2019, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Yeah sure, handjob Hannity is feeding that shit sandwich to his minions every day. Today he’s claiming Flynn will be changing his plea. I often ask myself how fucking stupid do you have to be to believe that bullshit. Then you actually meet those people and realize why they eat that shit.

It's the dim-retards who've been feasting of Schitty's shit.

FYI, Flynn's new lawyer bears great animus towards Mueller's Weissmann; who she justifiably maintains should have been disbarred a long time ago for his prosecutorial abuses. She's previously exposed Weissmann for being the abusive liar he is, and she's beat Weissmann in court before. Tick-tock, tick-tock.

bambino · 06-12-2019, 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

It's the dim-retards who've been feasting of Schitty's shit.

FYI, Flynn's new lawyer bears great animus towards Mueller's Weissmann; who she justifiably maintains should have been disbarred a long time ago for his prosecutorial abuses. She's previously exposed Weissmann for being the abusive liar he is, and she's beat Weissmann in court before. Tick-tock, tick-tock.

Yeah, Powell is a good choice. We’ll see what her strategy is. I’m sure she wants to give Weissmann another black eye.

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile...-shake-up/amp/

Jaxson66 · 06-12-2019, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

It's the dim-retards who've been feasting of Schitty's shit.

FYI, Flynn's new lawyer bears great animus towards Mueller's Weissmann; who she justifiably maintains should have been disbarred a long time ago for his prosecutorial abuses. She's previously exposed Weissmann for being the abusive liar he is, and she's beat Weissmann in court before. Tick-tock, tick-tock.

FYI , Weismann isn’t the one being sentenced for his guilty plea.

I B Hankering · 06-12-2019, 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

FYI , Weismann isn’t the one being sentenced for his guilty plea.

You just keep believing that.

Weissmann is going to have his fucking ass handed to him the way he and Mueller misrepresented Dowd's conversation ... and how they bolstered their allegations with the testimony of a convicted pedophile. Flynn has another ninety days before he goes back to court. Horowitz and maybe Durham will have published their findings by then.

Tick-tock, tick-tock.