Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

dearhunter · 03-25-2014, 08:10 AM

Whore went all potty mouth......whore got banned.......we will see how "ignorant" she is when she gets back.......pray for sooner and expect later, and you can't be disappointed in the results........ijs

Sadly, I do not have a taint photo of Slave to post........sorry, 3sides

Netx9 · 03-25-2014, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dearhunter

Whore went all potty mouth......whore got banned.......we will see how "ignorant" she is when she gets back.......pray for sooner and expect later, and you can't be disappointed in the results........ijs

Sadly, I do not have a taint photo of Slave to post........sorry, 3sides

Can one of those sides be expressed without Vulgar slang? (guideline #4)

dearhunter · 03-25-2014, 08:45 AM

See that little red triangle?

It is your friend........I thinck.

Whispers · 03-25-2014, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Netx9

Can one of those sides be expressed without Vulgar slang? (guideline #4)

Definition of WHORE

1 : a woman who engages in sexual acts for money

That is from Merriam Webster. You may find it to be "Vulgar" but it is hardly "slang"

No where in the definition of "Provider" is a sex worker imagined.

SG has thrown enough insults and been vile enough to been banned 2 or 3 times over simply on points. She has outed client information through pillow talk to her former lover Rocker Rick that has been posted here on the boards and at least twice she outed personal information regarding Slavak and his personal preferences BCD.

When she cannot maintain her composure and be factual she fabricates and posts lies.

There are a lot of ladies here in the forum that many of you do a tremendous disservice to by fighting this battle for SG.

She IS a Whore. And deserves the label more so than any provider ever to post.

It is truly amazing how far up her ass some of your heads are.

Precious_b · 03-25-2014, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whispers

Definition of WHORE

1 : a woman who engages in sexual acts for money

That is from Merriam Webster. You may find it to be "Vulgar" but it is hardly "slang"

....

So quoted the John, Kerb Crawler, Rent Boy, Trick, Pidgeon, etc.

If you are going to use that definition for the woman, don't forget to denote yourself with the flipside of the definition for yourself. I'm willing to bet you don't see Hobbyist there either.

Whispers · 03-25-2014, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Precious_b

So quoted the John, Kerb Crawler, Rent Boy, Trick, Pidgeon, etc.

If you are going to use that definition for the woman, don't forget to denote yourself with the flipside of the definition for yourself. I'm willing to bet you don't see Hobbyist there either.

Why? I have you and others for that..... then again... those terms apply to all the guys here right?

Precious_b · 03-25-2014, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whispers

Why? I have you and others for that..... then again... those terms apply to all the guys here right?

If so, that would be giving credit to others. We so know how you like that credit to be to yourself.

So just refer to yourself in the lingua franca that you use for the women of the site. The masculine verbage that dearhunter also uses.

Whispers · 03-25-2014, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Precious_b

If so, that would be giving credit to others. We so know how you like that credit to be to yourself.

So just refer to yourself in the lingua franca that you use for the women of the site. The masculine verbage that dearhunter also uses.

But wait. I don't call ALL the women whores. Just those special ones that request the attention it brings.

Precious_b · 03-25-2014, 09:16 PM

Apply those special terms to yourself when doing so. Spread that love all around.

Netx9 · 03-26-2014, 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whispers

Definition of WHORE

1 : a woman who engages in sexual acts for money

That is from Merriam Webster. You may find it to be "Vulgar" but it is hardly "slang"

No where in the definition of "Provider" is a sex worker imagined.

SG has thrown enough insults and been vile enough to been banned 2 or 3 times over simply on points

Quote:

#4 - Blatant insults or hostility toward another member will be met with staff intervention. This applies to using our coed forums for name calling, personal attacks, or vulgar slang terms to describe fellow members. If you have legitimate concerns about another member here, share them tactfully in the appropriate private forums or with staff.

You know better... A bitch is a female dog and a faggot is a bundle of sticks but unless your talking about a dog or sticks, they're insults. You already admitted to using it as in insult. Certainly hostile, definitely name calling, absolutely personal.

As for SG throwing insults, so have savak, Louigi, deerhunter and others who have crawled out of some hole somewhere. If she should be pointed, all should be admonished. "She did it too" is not an excuse... 2 wrongs don't make a right. Using that argument makes you no better.

I'm sure nothing will come of it... Just pointing out the flaw in your rationale.

Guest032716 · 03-26-2014, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Netx9

Just pointing out the flaw in your rationale.

Flaws that are legion!

back on topic

Guest062114-5 · 03-26-2014, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dearhunter

I'm partial to whores. While some might consider that a character flaw, I thinck of it as enlightenment.

You can RTM him all you want, but why??? Above is a quote that he said in regards to me...

It, in part, inspired one of most infamous threads...and several other offshoots.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...ighlight=whore

Guest032716 · 03-27-2014, 09:03 PM

Slave's outfit for my "save us from the hobby savior" fundraiser this year!

Guest062114-5 · 03-27-2014, 09:09 PM

Say what you like about Whispers, he does raise a bunch of money for worthy causes at Christmas time...why would anyone want to curtail that?

a10bomb · 03-28-2014, 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LilMynx69

Say what you like about Whispers, he does raise a bunch of money for worthy causes at Christmas time...why would anyone want to curtail that?

It's not about trying to curtail that as charitable donations are honorable things to do. The problem has been and continues to be where Whispers continues to claim/speculate that SG has a disease that could cause harm to members of this community without any proof whatsoever rule #16 of the ECCIE guidelines states and I quote:

#16 - Posting about/Speculating about another person's medical condition is strictly forbidden. If a member encounters a medical issue and would like to get feedback from others or share it with the community, this would be allowed, but under no circumstances is a member to discuss or state anything about another member in this regard, unless it is in response to a question posed by that member.

Now since Whispers has no direct knowledge of her condition other than what she has posted here it is therefore speculating about it which is not and should not be allowed.

The second problem I have is: that there is no where in any thread that SG has asked for his opinion or anyone else's for that matter about her condition so again Whispers should not be allowed to continue to mention it in any public or private forum including pm's and no I am not divulging any private info other than what was posted in the following thread:

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1007848

I am not sure how to quote single posts but I am referring to post 13 and 17 where it looks like Whispers is sending people info on what he believes is slave's condition. He also at one time had his sig line also speculating on the same issues which to me is slanderous since he has no real knowledge of her situation. But let's say he did have actual info on her condition he is still in violation of rule #16 as it states and again I quote "but under no circumstances is a member to discuss or state anything about another member in this regard, unless it is in response to a question posed by that member."

Slave has never asked for his opinion in any public thread on this board. Has she posted what her condition is yes but that gives no right for me you or any other member the right to start questioning her on what she has or doesn't have

Now I don't know why the mods or the higher ups have allowed whispers and others to continue to bring up this subject but I personally don't think it is right and it should be stopped. And until that happens I as well as other will continue to support her.

You can call me a WK, a Lemming, or even a pimp. And just for the record she never asked for my help and I never asked her if she would like my help. I would have done the same for any other lady with the same situation that is how I am I believe in standing up for people who are being mistreated and cannot defend themselves. Which she currently cannot do because of the ban.