Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
646 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
392 |
Harley Diablo |
375 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
275 |
George Spelvin |
263 |
sharkman29 |
255 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70717 | biomed1 | 62700 | Yssup Rider | 60420 | gman44 | 53234 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48462 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 41750 | CryptKicker | 37184 | Mokoa | 36491 | The_Waco_Kid | 36109 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
10-03-2016, 09:58 AM
|
#46
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman
The only pertinent "fact" from the reference you cited is this one:
But the RJF (Die Reichjugendfuhrung, the Reich Youth Leadership) has no jurisdiction to dictate the daily operations of the Waffen-SS, which has been under the direct command of Heinrich Himmler. So what the RJF had "suggested" in 1940 "that long-term volunteers could enlist in the W-SS at seventeen" is not a pertinent fact to support your argument.
On the other hand, my argument is supported by the measures that Gottlob Berger, chief of the Waffen-SS recruiting department, had undertaken in the spring of 1941:
So it's obvious that your citing of a "suggestion" is trumped by my presentation of the relevant facts, ignorant Little Hans.
|
It wasn't a "suggestion", Andy the Little Nazi Boy, it's a documented, historic fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman
You still have come up with nothing so support your argument.
|
No one can help you overcome your innate stupidity which is keeping you from seeing the obvious, Andy the Little Nazi Boy: it's a documented, historic fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman
|
Doesn't change the fact that the M42 Bluured Edge smock wasn't issued until 1942 when Germany was drawing on an ever younger population -- as illustrated in your avatar -- to fill its ranks in the armed forces, Andy the Little Nazi Boy; that' a documented, historic fact; hence, you must document that your avatar is of age to be in this forum, Andy the Little Nazi Boy.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-03-2016, 01:20 PM
|
#47
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-05-2016, 08:29 PM
|
#48
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
It wasn't a "suggestion", Andy the Little Nazi Boy, it's a documented, historic fact.
|
You can not be this dense. The documented and historic fact is that the RJF has no authority whatsoever to dictate how young a potential recruit could be drafted into the Waffen-SS, therefore whatever statements the RJF have made with regard to the enlisting requirements for the Waffen-SS are mere suggestions. Thus far you haven't cited a single documented, historic fact to corroborate your assertion that the Waffen-SS had been recruiting anyone younger than 18 prior to 1941, because you can't, and you never will, Little Hans.
But I do have a documented, historic fact for your "erudition," just to help you growing a pair so there's no need for you using this disparaging "und3r@g3" on those who have fought and died bravely for their respective fatherlands.
http://torcveteransmemorial.com/vietnam-wall
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-05-2016, 08:44 PM
|
#49
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Doesn't change the fact that the M42 Bluured Edge smock wasn't issued until 1942 when Germany was drawing on an ever younger population -- as illustrated in your avatar -- to fill its ranks in the armed forces, Andy the Little Nazi Boy; that' a documented, historic fact; hence, you must document that your avatar is of age to be in this forum, Andy the Little Nazi Boy.
|
You are wrong. Unlike your senseless harangue, I do have the "relevant exhibits" to support my arguments. Here's another one. Pay close attention that they are a tank crew of the Wehrmacht, not the Waffen-SS.
Attachment 575398
http://wehrmacht-awards.com/forums/s....php?p=6174109
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-05-2016, 09:38 PM
|
#50
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman
|
Keep it up, Nazi 0zombie, yeah!
waiting
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-05-2016, 09:42 PM
|
#51
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman
|
The 3 on the right look kind of sad?
Keep it up, Nazi 0zombie, yeah!
waiting
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-05-2016, 10:57 PM
|
#52
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman
You can not be this dense. The documented and historic fact is that the RJF has no authority whatsoever to dictate how young a potential recruit could be drafted into the Waffen-SS, therefore whatever statements the RJF have made with regard to the enlisting requirements for the Waffen-SS are mere suggestions. Thus far you haven't cited a single documented, historic fact to corroborate your assertion that the Waffen-SS had been recruiting anyone younger than 18 prior to 1941, because you can't, and you never will, Little Hans.
But I do have a documented, historic fact for your "erudition," just to help you growing a pair so there's no need for you using this disparaging "und3r@g3" on those who have fought and died bravely for their respective fatherlands.
http://torcveteransmemorial.com/vietnam-wall
|
You're a lying Scheiskopf, Andy the Little Nazi Boy; a widely cited and respected source was already cited in a previous post, Andy the Little Nazi Boy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman
|
You're a Scheiskopf, Andy the Little Nazi Boy. That's not the M42 Blurred Edge camo smock in your picture, Andy the Little Nazi Boy, and the date on the other pictures on the site you cited is June 1944 -- two years after the M42 Blurred Edge camo smock was fielded, Andy the Little Nazi Boy.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-08-2016, 04:51 PM
|
#53
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You're a lying Scheiskopf, Andy the Little Nazi Boy; a widely cited and respected source was already cited in a previous post, Andy the Little Nazi Boy.
|
A "source" was cited, but that "source" is neither "documented" nor "historic." But again I do have one more that is documented and historic, for your "erudition." Google "Jack W. Hill".
Now you don't mind to give me a name, any name to prove that the Waffen-SS had been recruiting anyone under the age of 18, 1941 and prior?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-08-2016, 05:00 PM
|
#54
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman
A "source" was cited, but that "source" is neither "documented" nor "historic." But again I do have one more that is documented and historic, for your "erudition." Google "Jack W. Hill".
Now you don't mind to give me a name, any name to prove that the Waffen-SS had been recruiting anyone under the age of 18, 1941 and prior?
|
It's a funny thing, Andy the Little Nazi Boy, here I was reading historian Ian Kershaw's The Nazi Dictatorship. Problems and Perspectives of Interpretation on Thursday, and Kershaw cited the same work I cited by historian Gerhard Rempel ... and here you are stupidly dismissing that study by historian Rempel's work as "unhistoric". Guess what, Andy the Little Nazi Boy? Kershaw and Rempel trump your ignorant ass every fuckin' day of the week, Andy the Little Nazi Boy.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-08-2016, 05:17 PM
|
#55
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You're a Scheiskopf, Andy the Little Nazi Boy. That's not the M42 Blurred Edge camo smock in your picture, Andy the Little Nazi Boy, and the date on the other pictures on the site you cited is June 1944 -- two years after the M42 Blurred Edge camo smock was fielded, Andy the Little Nazi Boy.
|
You still haven't provided a single "relevant exhibit" to support your accusation. You can't, because once you try, you lose your entire argument. The fact is that the M42 Blurred Edge Type II camo smocks had been issued to the Waffen-SS personnel since 1939, not 1942 as you have falsely claimed. So you have to go all the way back to 1939 to dig up a name, any name for me to google, Little Hans.
http://mantheline.com/product/waffen...at-field-smock
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
10-08-2016, 06:09 PM
|
#56
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman
You still haven't provided a single "relevant exhibit" to support your accusation. You can't, because once you try, you lose your entire argument. The fact is that the M42 Blurred Edge Type II camo smocks had been issued to the Waffen-SS personnel since 1939, not 1942 as you have falsely claimed. So you have to go all the way back to 1939 to dig up a name, any name for me to google, Little Hans.
http://mantheline.com/product/waffen...at-field-smock
|
You're a liar, Andy the Little Nazi Boy. I cited Rempel's book and gave a link to the pages that prove you are wrong, Andy the Little Nazi Boy. And the M42 Blurred Edge Camo Smock was not fielded until 1942; hence, its nomenclature "M42" -- just like the "42 in "Maschinengewehr 42" means it was fielded in "1942", Andy the Little Nazi Boy.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|