Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
George Spelvin 312
Starscream66 301
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 262
Top Posters
DallasRain71328
biomed167661
Yssup Rider62831
gman4454993
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49479
WTF48272
pyramider46416
bambino45243
The_Waco_Kid39854
CryptKicker37390
Mokoa36499
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Dr-epg34160

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-30-2017, 03:33 PM   #46
Ex-CEO
Ultra Premium Access
 
Join Date: Sep 6, 2014
Location: Uptown Dallas
Posts: 832
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Forget all that tell us who the Apollo 11 moon landing hoax jackass is! It's JD right? That fucking Malaysia Airline conspiracy nutcase.
Actually, no. It was someone else (or maybe more than one person).

Quick search of "Apollo" turned up this thread where the libertarian guy COG posed a poll with a lot of replies.

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1...ghlight=apollo

As I recall, this was prompted by a couple of earlier posts by one or two people who buy into some of the silliest conspiracy theories imaginable.
Ex-CEO is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 04:17 PM   #47
DSK
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 8,050
Encounters: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman View Post
Like you won't?

No, it's very obvious.
You keep bringing them up to divert attention away from trump.
He's a total disaster. You're glad trump is in. Not so he-be-a-bitch. Even He-be-a-bitch is bitching about trump.
In his own stupid way of course. All he does is complain Clinton didn't beat trump. He blames her for getting us in the mess we're in. Keep pointing everywhere but at your butt boy.
Jesus, what an ignorant fucking parrot.

You derive what little power you perceive via this gang mentality.

Obama has let you in his circle of jerks and somehow you and others feel empowered.

On a side note, I'd actually love for you to break into my house so I could light you up like a Christmas tree.
DSK is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 04:21 PM   #48
DSK
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 8,050
Encounters: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman View Post
Most everything is affected by temperature, douche-bag. But glass isn't significantly affected by the normal atmospheric conditions. It gets more brittle, but that's about it. The expansion and retraction are negligible in the operating range. Pyrex has an expansion coefficient of .09. Iron is 1.2.

"For any given substance, the coefficient of linear expansion is typically a number expressed in terms of 10−5/°C. In other words, the value of a particular solid's linear expansion coefficient is multiplied by 0.00001 per °C. (The °C in the denominator, shown in the equation below, simply "drops out" when the coefficient of linear expansion is multiplied by the change in temperature.)"

Are glass/mercury thermometers as precise as electronic thermometers? Probably not but it all depends on the scale of the thermometer. The point is that glass thermometers have been capable of +/- .1 degrees F for quite some time. Calibration can be an issue for individual thermometers but in the overall group in a large area won't have an impact.
You're claiming because you don't know the details of the maintenance of more modern equipment that it's unreliable.
You already assume it's incorrect and you look for info that backs that up and ignores info you don't like.

I completely understand it.
Both concept and the limitations of the different types of instruments.
The fact remains you don't know science and you scoff on researching your "answers". Whether or not the information has been skewed can be debated. You can claim an entire profession is lazy or lax.
But the instruments are reliable within the scope of use they were designed for. They are calibrated when made. They are sealed. Glass isn't a liquid.

I'm sure you have heard the word "twerp". As educated and well off as you claim to be, you are nothing more than a twerp. And a racist twerp at that.
If the temperature difference lies within the repeatability of the measuring instrument, the very small change in temperature is not indicative of a trend. Without calibration of the instrument traceable to the National Bureau of Standards, any reasonable person would conclude there is no confidence in the trend.

I'm kicking your stuttering chickenshit ass again, you little cocksucker. Maybe you just can't talk to people in real life, so you rage away on here and make a fool of yourself.

Fuck off and die, you cocksucker.
DSK is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 04:28 PM   #49
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DSK View Post
If the temperature difference lies within the repeatability of the measuring instrument, the very small change in temperature is not indicative of a trend. Without calibration of the instrument traceable to the National Bureau of Standards, any reasonable person would conclude there is no confidence in the trend.

.
So core samples showing it to be the hottest in a hundred thousand year , would constitute a trend you Asian slave fucker?
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 04:32 PM   #50
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DSK View Post
Jesus, what an ignorant fucking parrot.

You derive what little power you perceive via this gang mentality.

Obama has let you in his circle of jerks and somehow you and others feel empowered.

On a side note, I'd actually love for you to break into my house so I could light you up like a Christmas tree.
According to COGay, you should acknowledge me writing that other than your substitution of Obama for that little handed Trump!
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 05:31 PM   #51
DSK
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 8,050
Encounters: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
According to COGay, you should acknowledge me writing that other than your substitution of Obama for that little handed Trump!
I agree with COGay, whoever he is.

I acknowledge your contribution to that insult.

I like to copy the insults of liberals, it gets me a free pass!!
DSK is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 05:32 PM   #52
DSK
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 8,050
Encounters: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
So core samples showing it to be the hottest in a hundred thousand year , would constitute a trend you Asian slave fucker?
I have no confidence in the assumption behind the ice cores that they contain an accurate record of temperatures back when your ancestors were fucking [prohibited topic]s.
DSK is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 06:32 PM   #53
the_real_Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: May 20, 2017
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 5,453
Encounters: 34
Default

For WTF and his followers, at no time have I ever said (or written) that I think the Apollo 11 moon landing was fake. I watched it on TV in the summer of 1969. Of course, people like WTF and his cum guzzling ilk also think a life time non drinker is posting drunk. I don't know what his boyfriend has been imbibing but it sounds like WTF is getting a contact high from his cock.

Back to the OP (I do hope that the moderator has taken note of all the people trying hijack my thread), win, lose, or draw the media and democrats want to make this election some kind of litmus test for Trump. They have pumped in so much money that anything that happens cannot be a test for anything. Kind of like researchers with two lab rats; one white and one brown. A bet is made which rat is the stronger and better rat. One researcher starts injecting his favorite with vitamins and steroids. The other researcher not wanting to be beaten (even through cheating) starts doing the same and starts blood transfusions with younger blood (doping). The other researcher starts replacing body parts with bionics which is followed by the other researcher doing the same. From the first moment that they tampered with the rats the results were invalidated. Same thing with this election. Who ever wins, who ever loses, it means nothing to the body politic except how much money can we spend.
the_real_Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 06:46 PM   #54
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn View Post

Back to the OP (I do hope that the moderator has taken note of all the people trying hijack my thread),
RTM the Mods JD, let them know a bunch of meanies are hijacking you thread in the political forum!
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 08:12 PM   #55
Munchmasterman
Valued Poster
 
Munchmasterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
Encounters: 10
Default

How do you calibrate a sealed thermometer with fixed markings? How would the readings change if no mercury is lost? In what way can it change? Over what period of time?
See, you're lazy
First, you said glass is a liquid. Then you said it expands or shrinks with temp. Which is true but not a significant amount.
You don't have a clue what the linear expansion coefficient is or how it applies.
Then you bring up the Bureau of Standards. First off, that is a US institution. Europeans don't use it. Second, the Bureau has information on all the thermometers the scientific community would buy. No one would buy a thermometer that wasn't approved. They would have long-term data on the sealed thermometers. The degree of accuracy depends on the scale. Like I said in the previous post. The instrument is accurate and repeatable withing a set range as determined by numerous factors.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSK View Post
If the temperature difference lies within the repeatability of the measuring instrument, the very small change in temperature is not indicative of a trend. Without calibration of the instrument traceable to the National Bureau of Standards, any reasonable person would conclude there is no confidence in the trend.A reasonable person would look up the information before claiming he knew what it said.
It's obvious you are using someone else's talking points (you're a parrot). And you don't know enough about the subject material to even discuss this.
You don't even know the basic states of matter. Take your "ass kicking" down the road.


I'm kicking your stuttering chickenshit ass again, you little cocksucker. Maybe you just can't talk to people in real life, so you rage away on here and make a fool of yourself.
I'm not going to dumb it down for you. You said I was too stupid to see how glass was a liquid. Turns out you're just barely smart enough to know better than to try to explain that little-known fact.
Just because you can't understand what I'm talking about and you won't research anything except Southern Klan Living, the limits that define you don't apply to others. It's called learning.
You ought to try it.

Fuck off and die, you cocksucker.
You might be licking my ass but you sure aren't kicking it. Again?
You haven't refuted a single point. The Bureau recognizes instruments that don't need calibration. Like a ruler douche-bag. Do you take your yardstick in for calibration every year? The thermometer is calibrated when it is manufactured.
We have a meltdown in progress. You have no facts. You proclaim you're not losing but actually winning. You're kicking my ass and you're going to light me up.
Ohhh. I'm afraid of the scary man in the white sheet.
Fuck off and die?
Ladies first, bitch.
Munchmasterman is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 08:36 PM   #56
Munchmasterman
Valued Poster
 
Munchmasterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ex-CEO View Post
Comprehension isn't one of your long suits, is it?

Several people (at least 3 or 4, as I recall) pointed out the obvious fallacies inherent in your "argument." They presented their opinions. And as Mr.
Stupid himself, you see a lack of response by the mods as a "win".
I bet you have a shelf of participation trophies, don't you?
Yet you decided to plow right ahead and double (triple? quadruple?) down on stupidity, didn't you?

But go right ahead and continue calling everyone who dares to disagree with you a "douche bag" or a "bitch."

It's all you've got.
And you still can't explain why it's wrong. "illicit drugs mention and drug use mention" Pretty straight forward, even for a moron like you. No need to keep discussing it. You're just talking the same old shit.
You dropped out of that thread quite some time ago but it looks like you want to discuss anything but trump.
Funny how the president is missing in action in a political forum.
I'd be ashamed if I were you too.
Munchmasterman is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 08:59 PM   #57
DSK
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 8,050
Encounters: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman View Post
How do you calibrate a sealed thermometer with fixed markings? How would the readings change if no mercury is lost? In what way can it change? Over what period of time?
See, you're lazy
First, you said glass is a liquid. Then you said it expands or shrinks with temp. Which is true but not a significant amount.
You don't have a clue what the linear expansion coefficient is or how it applies.
Then you bring up the Bureau of Standards. First off, that is a US institution. Europeans don't use it. Second, the Bureau has information on all the thermometers the scientific community would buy. No one would buy a thermometer that wasn't approved. They would have long-term data on the sealed thermometers. The degree of accuracy depends on the scale. Like I said in the previous post. The instrument is accurate and repeatable withing a set range as determined by numerous factors.


You might be licking my ass but you sure aren't kicking it. Again?
You haven't refuted a single point. The Bureau recognizes instruments that don't need calibration. Like a ruler douche-bag. Do you take your yardstick in for calibration every year? The thermometer is calibrated when it is manufactured.
We have a meltdown in progress. You have no facts. You proclaim you're not losing but actually winning. You're kicking my ass and you're going to light me up.
Ohhh. I'm afraid of the scary man in the white sheet.
Fuck off and die?
Ladies first, bitch.
Comprehension isn't one of your long suits, is it?

Several people (at least 3 or 4, as I recall) pointed out the obvious fallacies inherent in your "argument." They presented their opinions. And as Mr.
Stupid himself, you see a lack of response by the mods as a "win".
I bet you have a shelf of participation trophies, don't you? Yet you decided to plow right ahead and double (triple? quadruple?) down on stupidity, didn't you?

But go right ahead and continue calling everyone who dares to disagree with you a "douche bag" or a "bitch."

It's all you've got.

BTW, all sorts of shit is calibrated when it is made. It needs to be checked later at certain intervals especially when billions of dollars of government spending is riding on it.

Fuck off and die!!
DSK is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 09:14 PM   #58
Munchmasterman
Valued Poster
 
Munchmasterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
Encounters: 10
Default

You think that all up by your lonesome?
Of course not. You stole almost all of that post you just made.
And the meltdown continues.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSK View Post
Comprehension isn't one of your long suits, is it?

Several people (at least 3 or 4, as I recall) pointed out the obvious fallacies inherent in your "argument." They presented their opinions. And as Mr.
Stupid himself, you see a lack of response by the mods as a "win".
I bet you have a shelf of participation trophies, don't you?
Yet you decided to plow right ahead and double (triple? quadruple?) down on stupidity, didn't you?

But go right ahead and continue calling everyone who dares to disagree with you a "douche bag" or a "bitch." You called me stupid because I had facts and you didn't. Stop whining.

It's all you've got.
I gave you numerous facts.
You don't know enough about the subject to recognise them as such or are too lazy to check them

BTW, all sorts of shit is calibrated when it is made. It needs to be checked later at certain intervals especially when billions of dollars of government spending is riding on it.

Fuck off and die!!
Like I said, you take your yardstick in every year, don't you?
Munchmasterman is offline   Quote
Old 05-31-2017, 10:17 AM   #59
Ex-CEO
Ultra Premium Access
 
Join Date: Sep 6, 2014
Location: Uptown Dallas
Posts: 832
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman View Post
And you still can't explain why it's wrong. "illicit drugs mention and drug use mention" Pretty straight forward, even for a moron like you. No need to keep discussing it. You're just talking the same old shit...
Could you possibly be any more obtuse?

The issue was explained to you in sufficiently clear terms that any reasonably sentient seventh-grader could not possibly have failed to understand it. Yes, straightforward indeed!

If you still don't get it, there simply isn't any hope for you.
Ex-CEO is offline   Quote
Old 05-31-2017, 11:14 AM   #60
tonyvicksa
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 4, 2012
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 684
Encounters: 10
Default Gotta Side With DSK

No way you will ever convince me they know the exact temp 100,000 years ago. No fucking way!

Scientist have changes their thought on what happened to dinosaurs from when I was in elementary school. Now they want me to believe they have accurate temperature reading for the last few 100,000 years?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DSK View Post
I have no confidence in the assumption behind the ice cores that they contain an accurate record of temperatures back when your ancestors were fucking [prohibited topic]s.
tonyvicksa is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved