Trumps Arizona convention

[bambino]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

There have been several on this forum. Ellen for one. There have been others but without going back and rereading every thread I wouldn't name names. You are not one of them. I remember countering the posts of individuals who said it would be a Trump landslide in 2020 by defining what many believe to be the definition of a landslide -- about 375 electoral votes.

That may have been true before Covid and the riots. I was more confident in January than today. Will Biden’s bunker strategy work? I don’t think so.

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2722632

[oeb11]

SR - You and I have a difference of opinion - which is part of american representative democracy.

Yes - I think a heavy turnout of LibDem millennials will give the election to biden - who is incapable of resisting the radicals in his Party.

mail in vote - LBJ, susan bucher, Brenda Snipes, Chicago Daly machine - and the list goes on. Some on both sides. Excusing vote fraud as "miniscule - only enables more - No vote Fraud is acceptable - IMHO- except to the LibDems - to whom any method of achieving election is not only acceptable - but mandated, regardless.

The FBI misconduct of the Trump campaign is an example - Nadler is holding hearings about the "politicization" of the FBI with two underling prosecutors - More Hearsay BS - while the Hypocrisy of the DemLib politicization Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and on and on - https://www.foxnews.com/politics/str...den-flynn-case.


Once biden is elected - the DOJ will promptly be repolitcized with new political operatives - and the machine turned against Trump - who will be pursued and prosecuted for "crimes" - not to mention every single Cabinet member and any and all republicans the LibDems can remember to name in indictments.


Read the true aims of teh OBLM leader Newsome - he intends to burn America to the ground and start fresh - with no History - and impose a Marxist authoritarian rule.

Wlcome - black Stalin- Thank U - OBLM

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Not sure how a crowd of 10,000 in Tulsa compares to the latest Biden venture or 20 people in Philadelphia last week. But hey, he's gotta come out the basement eventually. One does not need the Hubble telescope to see the difference.

Originally Posted by eccielover

I don't need glasses to see that Trump(and the OP of both this and the Tulsa thread) expected HUGE turnout that didn't materialize there.

Spin it any way you want, but the Optics of Tulsa was poor for Trump. Was it better than Biden, yes. Did it meet expectations set by the Trump campaign. not even close.

As this thread discusses, the Trump campaign rebounded somewhat in Arizona already, but the venue and coverage was far more limited than the "splash" they wanted in Tulsa.

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by oeb11

SR - You and I have a difference of opinion - which is part of american representative democracy....

But thanks to the new-agey definition of "peaceful protests", seems that besides disagreeing, you can now call him a racist, raid his house, loot it and burn it down, without guilt or fear of reprisal, then set up a wall around it and call it your own autonomous zone and demand reparations from him. Weird times we live in.

[oeb11]

WYID - a valid observation in some areas of DemLib run cities where law-abiding citizens are disarmed in favor of illegal gun carrying criminals.



Let the "peaceful protestors " try their shenanigans in Texas - they are very likely to be met with a legal, lethal round of lead poisoning.

[skirtchaser79411]

Trump has already killed thousands of americans

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by skirtchaser79411

Trump has already killed thousands of americans

oh yeah? name one ..


BAHHAHAAAAAA

[bambino]

Originally Posted by skirtchaser79411

Trump has already killed thousands of americans

He hasn’t, but Governor Cuomo has. Over 6000!!!

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by bambino

That may have been true before Covid and the riots. I was more confident in January than today. Will Biden’s bunker strategy work? I don’t think so.

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2722632

Biden can certainly be criticized for his campaign "rally" strategy. And Trump has caught a lot of flack for his rallies in which people totally disregard the threat of spreading the coronavirus. Which strategy do you think has cost which candidate the most votes?

Joe Biden’s cautious coronavirus campaign is trying to be anything but a Trump rally

As Trump resumes his signature campaign rallies, Biden has done the opposite, holding more modest gatherings, including three in the past month in and around Philadelphia. They showcase one of Biden’s strengths: his personal warmth. But they’re also limited in their reach and not always photogenic. Visuals from the events have been weaponized by the Trump campaign.

But Biden’s events have also telegraphed how he’s approaching the coronavirus pandemic and the kind of president he says he’d be: cautious and responsible. No individual photos with Biden are allowed, attendees must sit six feet apart, and journalists have their temperature taken before entry.

https://www.inquirer.com/politics/el...-20200625.html

[bambino]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Biden can certainly be criticized for his campaign "rally" strategy. And Trump has caught a lot of flack for his rallies in which people totally disregard the threat of spreading the coronavirus. Which strategy do you think has cost which candidate the most votes?

Joe Biden’s cautious coronavirus campaign is trying to be anything but a Trump rally

As Trump resumes his signature campaign rallies, Biden has done the opposite, holding more modest gatherings, including three in the past month in and around Philadelphia. They showcase one of Biden’s strengths: his personal warmth. But they’re also limited in their reach and not always photogenic. Visuals from the events have been weaponized by the Trump campaign.

But Biden’s events have also telegraphed how he’s approaching the coronavirus pandemic and the kind of president he says he’d be: cautious and responsible. No individual photos with Biden are allowed, attendees must sit six feet apart, and journalists have their temperature taken before entry.

https://www.inquirer.com/politics/el...-20200625.html

Nobody knows how many votes have been lost or gained right now. Won’t know until November. If Biden is going to be a cautious President, why did he bash Trump for closing flights from China when he did? How bad would the spread have been if Biden let Chinese flights continue for months? How many LIVES would that have COST?

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by bambino

Nobody knows how many votes have been lost or gained right now. Won’t know until November. If Biden is going to be a cautious President, why did he bash Trump for closing flights from China when he did? How bad would the spread have been if Biden let Chinese flights continue for months? How many LIVES would that have COST?

That does not seem to be true.

Our ruling

Speaking of his restriction on travel from China, Trump said, “I had Biden calling me xenophobic. ... . He called me a racist, because of the fact that he felt it was a racist thing to stop people from China coming in.”

Biden has not directly said that the restrictions were xenophobic. Around the time the Trump administration announced the travel restriction, Biden said that Trump had a “record of hysteria, xenophobia, and fear-mongering.” Biden used the phrase “xenophobic” in reply to a Trump tweet about limiting entry to travelers from China and in which he described the coronavirus as the “Chinese virus.” Biden did not spell out which part of Trump’s tweet was xenophobic.

Trump’s statement contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression. We rate it Mostly False.


https://www.statesman.com/news/20200...l-restrictions

[bambino]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

That does not seem to be true.

Our ruling

Speaking of his restriction on travel from China, Trump said, “I had Biden calling me xenophobic. ... . He called me a racist, because of the fact that he felt it was a racist thing to stop people from China coming in.”

Biden has not directly said that the restrictions were xenophobic. Around the time the Trump administration announced the travel restriction, Biden said that Trump had a “record of hysteria, xenophobia, and fear-mongering.” Biden used the phrase “xenophobic” in reply to a Trump tweet about limiting entry to travelers from China and in which he described the coronavirus as the “Chinese virus.” Biden did not spell out which part of Trump’s tweet was xenophobic.

Trump’s statement contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression. We rate it Mostly False.


https://www.statesman.com/news/20200...l-restrictions

Where did you see Xenophobia in my post Speedy? I said Biden did a flip flop on the travel bans. He finally admitted in April it was a wise move. Nice try at deflection.

https://www.cerescourier.com/opinion...na-travel-ban/

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by bambino

Where did you see Xenophobia in my post Speedy? I said Biden did a flip flop on the travel bans. He finally admitted in April it was a wise move. Nice try at deflection.

https://www.cerescourier.com/opinion...na-travel-ban/

Your statement was that Biden bashed Trump for stopping flights from China. The article I cited said that is unfounded.

[oeb11]

Biden certainly had nothing to say to contradict DeBlasio and Cuomo, along with kalifornia politicos who welcomed people out into festivals AFTER Trump shut down the China flights.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Your statement was that Biden bashed Trump for stopping flights from China. The article I cited said that is unfounded.

Read it. For once. It said Trumps claims that Biden said he was Xenophobic mostly false. Nothing about when Trump banned travel from China. Youre post is “completely” false

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/04/03/p...rus/index.html