Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 398
Jon Bon 385
Harley Diablo 373
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 265
sharkman29 252
George Spelvin 248
Top Posters
DallasRain70429
biomed160678
Yssup Rider59989
gman4452940
LexusLover51038
WTF48267
offshoredrilling47605
pyramider46370
bambino40335
CryptKicker37087
Mokoa36487
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35420
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-08-2020, 07:14 PM   #46
Jacuzzme
BANNED
 
Jacuzzme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 16, 2016
Location: Steel City
Posts: 7,672
Encounters: 42
Default

Quote:
No military person in his/her right mind would obey or respect the bone spur in chief. They laugh n make fun of him too.
You don’t have the slightest clue what you’re talking about. Enlisted men LOVE President Trump and it’s about 50/50 with officers.
Jacuzzme is offline   Quote
Old 09-08-2020, 10:40 PM   #47
dilbert firestorm
Premium Access
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm View Post
if theres to be a civil war, what kind would it be?

organized mess - america 1861 - 1865
hot mess - Yugoslavia 1993-2000

meh... my question is not being answered.
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 09-08-2020, 11:47 PM   #48
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,631
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought View Post
when these kind of things come up, the cynic in me always suspects the methodology of having purposeful illogic, as in the statement may be true but misleading
Absolutely!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace Preston View Post
There are 8 states that contribute more to the federal purse than they get back from the federal government.



New York
New Jersey
Massachusetts
Connecticut
Colorado
Minnesota
Utah
Nebraska

Two more states are at a dead even split.. and those are California and Washington



Every other state-- receives more from the government than they pay in. 6 of the above 8-- are "DPST Maxist" states. The worst offenders in regards to receiving more than they get? All of them are Red states, with the exception of New Mexico (Mississippi, Kentucky, West Virginia, Montana, South Carolina, Indiana, New Mexico)


Yeah-- you may hate how they govern.. but the fact of the matter is-- they contribute more than they get.
This most likely is from a hit piece prepared by the Rockefeller Institute of Government, funded by and for the benefit of the Division of the Budget of the State of New York:

https://rockinst.org/wp-content/uplo...f-Payments.pdf

Basically the state of New York is trying to show it's getting screwed by the federal government. The people who wrote the report are biased. They're getting paid to show New York got screwed.

If you dig deeper into the report (page 10), you will see that federal spending is not the culprit. Total federal expenditures in New York are $11,530 per person, compared to an average of $11,631 per person in the whole United States. The reason New York and New Yorkers pay $1125 per person more to the Feds than they receive is because individual income taxes in New York are $7670 per person, compared to $5075 average for the USA.

Put another way, New York has a lot of rich mother fuckers who make a lot of money. And the income tax system in the U.S.A. is the most progressive in the developed world. The top 1% pay 37% of the income tax. In terms of income per person, New York is number 8 in the USA. In fact, on your list of 8 states which pay more to the feds than they take in, and two that break even, all except Nebraska are among the top 15 states in terms of per capita income.

So, if the federal government would devote 37% of its resources and spending to the top 1%, the same percentage it takes from them in income tax, this problem would disappear. The rich Northeasterners would get back the money they paid in. I suspect these people are predominantly Republicans btw.

No matter, the northeastern states on your list also have high state income taxes, so their wealthier residents are leaving for more friendly places like Texas and Florida. And the rich people will disappear from the blue states on your list and those states will pay less to the federal government. Everything will even out. The two red states on your list of eight, Utah and Nebraska, and the one purple state, Colorado, don't have high state income taxes. Utah's and Colorado's populations are growing and Nebraska is stable.
Tiny is offline   Quote
Old 09-09-2020, 12:32 AM   #49
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,631
Encounters: 2
Default

There’s some irony here. Democrats who promote a strongly redistributive tax policy are also aghast at how some blue states pay more to the federal government than they get back. And it’s their redistributive policies that created this mismatch in the first place!

That’s not directed at you Grace. You’re pretty even handed and you’re not strongly partisan
Tiny is offline   Quote
Old 09-09-2020, 05:41 AM   #50
Grace Preston
Madame Moderator
 
Grace Preston's Avatar
 
User ID: 123904
Join Date: Feb 27, 2012
Location: Restaurant at the End of the Universe
Posts: 9,550
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

While your mentioned source was one of the sources I used-- I'm a pretty firm believer in multiple sources, particularly when we're talking economics and economic policy. I feel the reason they're high contributors is more simplistic-- a higher percentage of wealth overall. Despite rhetoric which would make one feel otherwise-- most of the mentioned states are highly desired places to live, overall-- and have a higher cost of living than anywhere else in the US. With a higher COL-- comes people of higher incomes, that can easily afford the associated costs.



I mean-- simple logic. Where do you think there is more overall wealth? Connecticut or Mississippi? New York or New Mexico? Colorado or West Virginia? (I'm using states I've actually set foot in.).



Beyond any of this-- the bigger picture is that its never a great idea to attempt to entirely eliminate one party from the table in a two party system. Autocracy is not healthy-- and if people want to see the worst of their own party-- that's the way to do it.
Grace Preston is offline   Quote
Old 09-09-2020, 07:37 AM   #51
rexdutchman
Valued Poster
 
rexdutchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1, 2013
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 12,555
Encounters: 22
Default

Dim-wits and selective memories ,,
Cali 13% income tax
47 of the top most violent cities DEM, 41 cities below Poverty levels DEMs Highest tax s ssssssss
Point being deflection and bad memory is all most of them have , facts NEVER on there side
rexdutchman is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved