Quote:
Originally Posted by burkalini
How can you tell a hobbyist how to do a review. The only thing that you should have to do with it is how you did during his session. I understand asking not to be too graphic but other that that it's really not up to you since reviews are for us. Don't get me wrong I always try to be honest and fair almost to a fault but I never ask the provider if I should review.
Just my opinion
|
I'm not Ansley and wouldn't even try to play her on TV, but on some sites, in order to answer all the danged questions, you have to answer questions whose answers might not be self-evident from the session and, more importantly, have a bearing on the performance score you assign.
Let me use TER as an example. About a year ago, I wrote a review there of what, to date, is the best session I have ever had. Definitely a "10" on performance. As the lady only had a couple of reviews and would benefit from me writing one, I did so.
Now, TER has some crazy specifications regarding performance scores. To get above a 7, a lady has to offer DFK, BBBJ, Anal or "Really be Bi" for each point above 7.
So to score a 10, she has to offer three of those four.
I have no interest in anal sex, so whether a woman offers it or not doesn't even cross my mind. As all my sessions are one-on-one, the fact that she may be bisexual isn't at all obvious unless she has a tatoo on her back that says "I am bisexual."
Given that I didn't know the answer to the "anal" or "bisexual" question, the highest score I could give was 9.
So ... I needed her help. I asked her: Are you bisexual and do you offer anal?
Turns out, she's bisexual. Perfect. Putting the right "X" in the right box allowed me to give her the 10 she deserves.
Personally, I think that essentially requiring a woman to either be bisexual or offer anal sex to qualify for a 10 in performance is STUPID in the extreme. Beyond merely stupid. However, since that site's reviews are very important for providers in some markets, you have to play their stupid game.
Thus, in order to fully and accurately write that review, I literally needed the provider's assistance.
Obviously, if she had come after me with an ax or something that merited a low review to protect the hobbying community at large, I wouldn't have needed her assistance as the score would have been "1."
This may explain to a degree why a provider would help in some aspects of the review process.
