Trump defense Ds the size of his JUNK -- You listening, JDrunk?

[Guest042616-1]

Originally Posted by lustylad

There you go again! They're comparable but a comparison "holds no water"? Make up your mind.

Comparing simply means pointing out the similarities. I am sure you have seen the very superficial, yet (mostly) valid, comparisons between Hitler and Trump. Does this justify calling Trump, Hitler? Of course not. Just because you can compare two things does not mean you can equate two things. In this case, you cannot even remotely equate them.

The fact that they are from "two entirely different eras" STRENGTHENS the comparison rather than weakens it. If it didn't taint Abe Lincoln back in the days when Queen Victoria was on her throne (an era known for its prim and puritanical codes of conduct) then why should it be considered a huge scandal in today's highly decadent culture? You haven't refuted this point and you can't.

You've repeated this point, but have not, at all, addressed my rebuttal. I get that you think everything has gotten more loose, the reality is that I've already pointed out an obvious and valid example of that position being wrong.

Originally Posted by lustylad

Eatfido just refuses to be honest about this. If he was, he would simply admit the Clintons get a pass because in his mind libtard politics "trumps" all character flaws.

As I said earlier, which you ignored and probably will again, "I tend to separate the private lives of a person from their political lives. As the statement goes 'good and great are seldom the same man.' I'm under no delusion that these candidates likely have skeletons in their closets, especially Clinton and especially Trump."

If you think I'm not voting for Trump because of this, you are sadly mistaken.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by eatfibo

As I said earlier, which you ignored and probably will again, "I tend to separate the private lives of a person from their political lives. As the statement goes 'good and great are seldom the same man.' I'm under no delusion that these candidates likely have skeletons in their closets, especially Clinton and especially Trump."

Everyone of Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator's *office conquests* of subordinate employees was "political" by virtue of the fact that he was taking advantage of subordinate public employees! Lewinsky wouldn't have given Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator the time of day let alone a blow job in the oval office if he hadn't been president.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by eatfibo

How many times do I have to say that is more unacceptable before you will understand that I agree that that is more unacceptable?

Well, for starters you could say it is SO unacceptable you would never let him back into the White House again!

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by eatfibo

As I said earlier, which you ignored and probably will again, "I tend to separate the private lives of a person from their political lives. As the statement goes 'good and great are seldom the same man.' I'm under no delusion that these candidates likely have skeletons in their closets, especially Clinton and especially Trump."

If you think I'm not voting for Trump because of this, you are sadly mistaken.

So if you liked Trump but then found out he sexually harassed his work subordinates and pestered 23-year-old interns for blowjobs under his desk, it wouldn't make you any less inclined to vote for him?

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Assup called me out by name? I don't pay any attention to him but if he wants beat down.... Trump and Rubio are late to the genitalia political game. Hillary has been putting her genitals on the campaign trail since day one (thank god she never went into detail). It takes a particularly bent person like assup to appreciate Hillary's genitals. I hope this is the last time her genitals are mentioned.

Maybe you can get a picture for your collection, JJunk!

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

And hypocritical lib-retards starting a thread feigning mock outrage at Trump's innuendo while voting to put Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator's chief enabler back in the White House is nothing less than ridiculous, Masterdickmuncher.

Mock outrage? You mean your mock outrage at supposed mock outrage?
OnlyTook4Words first used the word "outrage" in quotation marks in post 15 of this thread. He used it in response to his own answers to questions he asked earthling. One of your classic moves. He said it first and now it's your keystone to your entire point. Except it crumbled before you even used it. You should stop getting your info from "China". It is substandard and lacks structure
That you hold up Pres. Clinton as an excuse for anything anyone else that you favor can do is a given. Seen as a fact for any occasion by you, it is generally a non sequitur to everyone else.

Your projecting, your deflecting, your diverting, your misrepresentation of statements made by others, and your refusal to provide examples or any other type of data that you use to reach your "conclusions" is legendary. And even more legendary than those methods is your "if you keep saying it for long enough then it becomes true" strategy.

No wait. Did I say legendary?
I meant notorious.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Mock outrage? You mean your mock outrage at supposed mock outrage?
OnlyTook4Words first used the word "outrage" in quotation marks in post 15 of this thread. He used it in response to his own answers to questions he asked earthling. One of your classic moves. He said it first and now it's your keystone to your entire point. Except it crumbled before you even used it. You should stop getting your info from "China". It is substandard and lacks structure
That you hold up Pres. Clinton as an excuse for anything anyone else that you favor can do is a given. Seen as a fact for any occasion by you, it is generally a non sequitur to everyone else.

Your projecting, your deflecting, your diverting, your misrepresentation of statements made by others, and your refusal to provide examples or any other type of data that you use to reach your "conclusions" is legendary. And even more legendary than those methods is your "if you keep saying it for long enough then it becomes true" strategy.

No wait. Did I say legendary?
I meant notorious.

Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator's notorious actions speak loader than any of Trump's words, Masterdickmuncher; yet, you don't seem to have a problem with ignoring the blatant overt acts of indiscretion by the former as you hypocritically profess to be shocked by the words of the latter.

Originally Posted by lustylad

Eatfido just refuses to be honest about this. If he was, he would simply admit the Clintons get a pass because in his mind libtard politics "trumps" all character flaws.

Masterdickmuncher has that same problem.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator's notorious actions speak loader than any of Trump's words, Masterdickmuncher; yet, you don't seem to have a problem with ignoring the blatant overt acts of indiscretion by the former as you hypocritically profess to be shocked by the words of the latter.


Masterdickmuncher has that same problem.

CD hankering on his way to work.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

CD hankering on his way to work.

From your collection of pictures, it's obvious you have an odd collection of boyfriends, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Masterdickmuncher has that same problem.

Methinks beween the two of them, eatfido and dickmuncher have more double standards than the Hildabeast has pantsuits!

[Yssup Rider]

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

CD hankering on his way to work.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

From your collection of pictures, it's obvious you have an odd collection of boyfriends, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

oh he's odd that's certain. Ivan, thanks for sharing the family portrait. bawahahahaha




so like ... are you finally on the far right this time? AHAHAHa

[cptjohnstone]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

oh he's odd that's certain. Ivan, thanks for sharing the family portrait. bawahahahaha




so like ... are you finally on the far right this time? AHAHAHa

In cleaning out my mother's estate I found my very own Eva. It will go to the bath tub so I can piss on it

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Mock outrage? You mean your mock outrage at supposed mock outrage?
OnlyTook4Words first used the word "outrage" in quotation marks in post 15 of this thread. He used it in response to his own answers to questions he asked earthling. One of your classic moves. He said it first and now it's your keystone to your entire point. Except it crumbled before you even used it. You should stop getting your info from "China". It is substandard and lacks structure
That you hold up Pres. Clinton as an excuse for anything anyone else that you favor can do is a given. Seen as a fact for any occasion by you, it is generally a non sequitur to everyone else.

Your projecting, your deflecting, your diverting, your misrepresentation of statements made by others, and your refusal to provide examples or any other type of data that you use to reach your "conclusions" is legendary. And even more legendary than those methods is your "if you keep saying it for long enough then it becomes true" strategy.

No wait. Did I say legendary?
I meant notorious.

Can we get the "English" translation? Thanks...

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator's notorious actions speak loader than any of Trump's words, Masterdickmuncher; yet, you don't seem to have a problem with ignoring the blatant overt acts of indiscretion by the former as you hypocritically profess to be shocked by the words of the latter.


Masterdickmuncher has that same problem.

There you go again. Making shit up and lying out your ass.
Did mommy make you wear the dress again today? The blue one?

And how can anyone ignore the subject of Bill Clinton. You bring him into every conversation.

It's pretty obvious you have wardrobe envy. And celebrity envy too.

All because you washed your blue dress instead of putting in a bag. No DNA residue for you to make headlines with. Just you and a box of mints sitting next to an empty hope chest.